Literature DB >> 26084341

New Insulin Glargine 300 Units/mL Versus Glargine 100 Units/mL in People With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized, Phase 3a, Open-Label Clinical Trial (EDITION 4).

Philip D Home1, Richard M Bergenstal2, Geremia B Bolli3, Monika Ziemen4, Maria Rojeski5, Melanie Espinasse6, Matthew C Riddle7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes still provides suboptimal outcomes. Insulin glargine 300 units/mL (Gla-300), with a flatter pharmacodynamic profile compared with insulin glargine 100 units/mL (Gla-100), is an approach to this problem. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: People with type 1 diabetes, using a mealtime and basal insulin regimen, were randomized open-label to Gla-300 or Gla-100 and to morning or evening injection, continuing the mealtime analog, and followed for 6 months.
RESULTS: Participants (n = 549) were a mean age of 47 years and had a mean duration of diabetes of 21 years and BMI of 27.6 kg/m(2). The change in HbA1c (primary end point; baseline 8.1%) was equivalent in the two treatment groups (difference, 0.04% [95% CI -0.10 to 0.19]) (0.4 mmol/mol [-1.1 to 2.1]), and Gla-300 was thus noninferior. Similar results with wider 95% CIs were found for morning and evening injection times and for prebreakfast self-measured plasma glucose (SMPG) overall. Results were also similar for Gla-300 when morning and evening injection time was compared, including overlapping 8-point SMPG profiles. Hypoglycemia did not differ, except for the first 8 weeks of the study, when nocturnal confirmed or severe hypoglycemia was lower with Gla-300 (rate ratio 0.69 [95% CI 0.53-0.91]). Hypoglycemia with Gla-300 did not differ by time of injection. The basal insulin dose was somewhat higher at 6 months for Gla-300. The adverse event profile did not differ and was independent of the Gla-300 time of injection. Weight gain was lower with Gla-300.
CONCLUSIONS: In long-duration type 1 diabetes, Gla-300 provides similar glucose control to Gla-100, with a lower risk of hypoglycemia after transfer from other insulins, independent of time of injection, and less weight gain.
© 2015 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26084341     DOI: 10.2337/dc15-0249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  54 in total

Review 1.  Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time.

Authors:  Chantal Mathieu; Pieter Gillard; Katrien Benhalima
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 43.330

2.  Attributes Influencing Insulin Pen Preference Among Caregivers and Patients With Diabetes Who Require Greater Than 20 Units of Mealtime Insulin.

Authors:  Tao Wang; Kenneth A Conrad; Kate van Brunt; Tina M Rees
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

Review 3.  Novel Concentrated Insulin Delivery Devices: Developments for Safe and Simple Dose Conversions.

Authors:  Jeremy L Johnson; Jessica M Downes; Cassandra K Obi; Nana B Asante
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-11-28

4.  A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Glargine U300 and Glargine U100 for the Inpatient Management of Medicine and Surgery Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: Glargine U300 Hospital Trial.

Authors:  Francisco J Pasquel; M Cecilia Lansang; Ameer Khowaja; M Agustina Urrutia; Saumeth Cardona; Bonnie Albury; Rodolfo J Galindo; Maya Fayfman; Georgia Davis; Alexandra Migdal; Priyathama Vellanki; Limin Peng; Guillermo E Umpierrez
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 19.112

5.  [Which patients from routine care use the new insulin analogue glargine U300 compared to patients with glargine U100 : A multicenter analysis of 14,123 patients with insulin glargine from die diabetes registries DPV and DIVE].

Authors:  Barbara Bohn; Peter Bramlage; Christian Wagner; Matthias Kaltheuner; Reinhard Welp; Stefan Sziegoleit; Artur Zimmermann; Hans Martin Reuter; Michael Hummel; Jörg Gloyer; Reinhard W Holl; Thomas Danne
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2017-08-21

Review 6.  [Insulin therapy-new insulin analogues].

Authors:  M Ehren; H H Klein
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 7.  Prevention and Management of Severe Hypoglycemia and Hypoglycemia Unawareness: Incorporating Sensor Technology.

Authors:  Paola Lucidi; Francesca Porcellati; Geremia B Bolli; Carmine G Fanelli
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 8.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL.

Authors:  Jennifer N Clements; Tiffaney Threatt; Eileen Ward; Kayce M Shealy
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 9.  Efficacy and Safety of Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL versus 100 U/mL in Diabetes Mellitus: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Hernando Vargas-Uricoechea
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.011

Review 10.  Insulin Glargine 300 U/mL: A Review in Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Hannah A Blair; Gillian M Keating
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.