Literature DB >> 29546368

Quantifying Conservation Biological Control for Management of Bemisia tabaci (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) in Cotton.

Timothy F Vandervoet1, Peter C Ellsworth1, Yves Carrière2, Steven E Naranjo3.   

Abstract

Conservation biological control can be an effective tactic for minimizing insect-induced damage to agricultural production. In the Arizona cotton system, a suite of generalist arthropod predators provides critical regulation of Bemisia tabaci Gennadius (MEAM1) (Hemiptera: Aleyrodidae) and other pests. Arthropod predator and B. tabaci populations were manipulated with a range of broad-spectrum and selective insecticide exclusions to vary predator to prey interactions in a 2-yr field study. Predator to prey ratios associated with B. tabaci densities near the existing action threshold were estimated for six predator species found to be negatively associated with either adult and/or large nymphs of B. tabaci [Misumenops celer (Hentz) (Araneae: Thomisidae), Drapetis nr divergens (Diptera: Empididae), Geocoris pallens Stäl (Hemiptera: Geocoridae), Orius tristicolor (White) (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), Chrysoperla carnea s.l. (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae), and Collops spp. (Coleoptera: Melyridae)] with the first three most consistently associated with declining B. tabaci densities. Ratios ranged from 1 M. celer per 100 sweeps to 1 B. tabaci adult per leaf to 44 D. nr. divergens per 100 sweeps to 1 large nymph per leaf disk. These ratios represent biological control informed thresholds that might serve as simple-to-use decision tool for reducing risk in the current B. tabaci integrated pest management strategy. The identification of key predators within the large, flexible food web of the cotton agro-ecosystem and estimation of predator to B. tabaci ratios clarifies the role of key predators in B. tabaci suppression, yielding potential decision-making advantages that could contribute to further improving economic and environmental sustainability of insect management in the cotton system.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29546368     DOI: 10.1093/jee/toy049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  4 in total

1.  Does prey encounter and nutrient content affect prey selection in wolf spiders inhabiting Bt cotton fields?

Authors:  Dalila Rendon; Phillip W Taylor; Shawn M Wilder; Mary E A Whitehouse
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Responses to environmental variability by herbivorous insects and their natural enemies within a bioenergy crop, Miscanthus x giganteus.

Authors:  Alisa W Coffin; Dawn M Olson; Lynne Seymour; David D Bosch; Jason M Schmidt; Timothy C Strickland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mortality dynamics of a polyphagous invasive herbivore reveal clues in its agroecosystem success.

Authors:  Steven E Naranjo; Luis Cañas; Peter C Ellsworth
Journal:  Pest Manag Sci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 4.462

4.  Improving Whitefly Management.

Authors:  Alvin M Simmons; David G Riley
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 2.769

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.