Literature DB >> 29545721

Clinical laboratory and imaging evidence for effectiveness of agarose-agarose macrobeads containing stem-like cells derived from a mouse renal adenocarcinoma cell population (RMBs) in treatment-resistant, advanced metastatic colorectal cancer: Evaluation of a biological-systems approach to cancer therapy (U.S. FDA IND-BB 10091; NCT 02046174, NCT 01053013).

Barry H Smith1,2, Lawrence S Gazda1, Thomas J Fahey1, Angelica Nazarian1, Melissa A Laramore1, Prithy Martis1, Zoe P Andrada1, Joanne Thomas1, Tapan Parikh1, Sudipta Sureshbabu1, Nathaniel Berman1,2, Allyson J Ocean1, Richard D Hall1, David J Wolf1,2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The complexity, heterogeneity and capacity of malignant neoplastic cells and tumors for rapid change and evolution suggest that living-cell-based biological-systems approaches to cancer treatment are merited. Testing this hypothesis, the tumor marker, metabolic activity, and overall survival (OS) responses, to the use of one such system, implantable macrobeads [RENCA macrobeads (RMBs)], in phase I and IIa clinical trials in advanced, treatment-resistant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are described here.
METHODS: Forty-eight mCRC patients (30 females; 18 males), who had failed all available, approved treatments, underwent RMB implantation (8 RMB/kg body weight) up to 4 times in phase I and phase IIa open-label trials. Physicals, labs [tumor and inflammation markers, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH)] and positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) imaging to measure number/volume and metabolic activity of the tumors were performed pre- and 3-month-post-implantation to evaluate safety and initial efficacy (as defined by biological responses). PET-CT maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) (baseline and d 90; SUVmax ≥2.5), LDH, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and/or cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) response (baseline, d 30 and/or d 60) were assessed and compared to OS.
RESULTS: Responses after implantation were characterized by an at least 20% decrease in CEA and/or CA 19-9 in 75% of patients. Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positive lesions (phase I, 39; 2a, 82) were detected in 37/48 evaluable patients, with 35% stable volume and stable or decreased SUV (10) plus four with necrosis; 10, increased tumor volume, SUV. LDH levels remained stable and low in Responders (R) (d 0-60, 290.4-333.9), but increased steadily in Non-responders (NR) (d 0-60, 382.8-1,278.5) (d 60, P=0.050). Responders to RMBs, indicated by the changes in the above markers, correlated with OS (R mean OS=10.76 months; NR mean OS=4.9 months; P=0.0006).
CONCLUSIONS: The correlations of the tumor marker, tumor volume and SUV changes on PET-CT, and LDH levels themselves, and with OS, support the concept of a biological response to RMB implantation and the validity of the biological-systems approach to mCRC. A phase III clinical trial is planned.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical trial; RENCA macrobeads; colon cancer; metastatic colorectal cancer; systems-biology

Year:  2018        PMID: 29545721      PMCID: PMC5842235          DOI: 10.21147/j.issn.1000-9604.2018.01.08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin J Cancer Res        ISSN: 1000-9604            Impact factor:   5.087


  33 in total

1.  Lactate dehydrogenase 5 expression in operable colorectal cancer: strong association with survival and activated vascular endothelial growth factor pathway--a report of the Tumour Angiogenesis Research Group.

Authors:  Michael I Koukourakis; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Efthimios Sivridis; Kevin C Gatter; Adrian L Harris
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Challenging the Cancer Molecular Stratification Dogma: Intratumoral Heterogeneity Undermines Consensus Molecular Subtypes and Potential Diagnostic Value in Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Philip D Dunne; Darragh G McArt; Conor A Bradley; Paul G O'Reilly; Helen L Barrett; Robert Cummins; Tony O'Grady; Ken Arthur; Maurice B Loughrey; Wendy L Allen; Simon S McDade; David J Waugh; Peter W Hamilton; Daniel B Longley; Elaine W Kay; Patrick G Johnston; Mark Lawler; Manuel Salto-Tellez; Sandra Van Schaeybroeck
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-05-05       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Clonal evolution in cancer.

Authors:  Mel Greaves; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Extremely high genetic diversity in a single tumor points to prevalence of non-Darwinian cell evolution.

Authors:  Shaoping Ling; Zheng Hu; Zuyu Yang; Fang Yang; Yawei Li; Pei Lin; Ke Chen; Lili Dong; Lihua Cao; Yong Tao; Lingtong Hao; Qingjian Chen; Qiang Gong; Dafei Wu; Wenjie Li; Wenming Zhao; Xiuyun Tian; Chunyi Hao; Eric A Hungate; Daniel V T Catenacci; Richard R Hudson; Wen-Hsiung Li; Xuemei Lu; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The cancer epigenome: Concepts, challenges, and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Mark A Dawson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 63.714

6.  Systematic evaluation of the prognostic impact and intratumour heterogeneity of clear cell renal cell carcinoma biomarkers.

Authors:  Sakshi Gulati; Pierre Martinez; Tejal Joshi; Nicolai Juul Birkbak; Claudio R Santos; Andrew J Rowan; Lisa Pickering; Martin Gore; James Larkin; Zoltan Szallasi; Paul A Bates; Charles Swanton; Marco Gerlinger
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 20.096

7.  Initial LDH level can predict the survival benefit from bevacizumab in the first-line setting in Chinese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Chenxi Yin; Chang Jiang; Fangxin Liao; Yuming Rong; Xiuyu Cai; Guifang Guo; Huijuan Qiu; Xuxian Chen; Bei Zhang; Wenzhuo He; Liangping Xia
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Serum LDH predicts benefit from bevacizumab beyond progression in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Federica Marmorino; Lisa Salvatore; Cecilia Barbara; Giacomo Allegrini; Lorenzo Antonuzzo; Gianluca Masi; Fotios Loupakis; Beatrice Borelli; Silvana Chiara; Maria Chiara Banzi; Emanuela Miraglio; Domenico Amoroso; Francesco Dargenio; Andrea Bonetti; Angelo Martignetti; Myriam Paris; Daniela Tomcikova; Luca Boni; Alfredo Falcone; Chiara Cremolini
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Evaluation of prognostic factors in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer: a preplanned analysis of the FIRE-1 trial.

Authors:  C Giessen; L Fischer von Weikersthal; R P Laubender; S Stintzing; D P Modest; A Schalhorn; C Schulz; V Heinemann
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-08-20       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Prognostic significance of (18)FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer patients with liver metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Qian Xia; Jianjun Liu; Cheng Wu; Shaoli Song; Linjun Tong; Gang Huang; Yuanbo Feng; Yansheng Jiang; Yewei Liu; Ting Yin; Yicheng Ni
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.