Literature DB >> 26561581

Extremely high genetic diversity in a single tumor points to prevalence of non-Darwinian cell evolution.

Shaoping Ling1, Zheng Hu1, Zuyu Yang1, Fang Yang1, Yawei Li1, Pei Lin2, Ke Chen1, Lili Dong1, Lihua Cao1, Yong Tao1, Lingtong Hao1, Qingjian Chen2, Qiang Gong1, Dafei Wu1, Wenjie Li1, Wenming Zhao1, Xiuyun Tian3, Chunyi Hao3, Eric A Hungate4, Daniel V T Catenacci5, Richard R Hudson6, Wen-Hsiung Li7, Xuemei Lu8, Chung-I Wu9.   

Abstract

The prevailing view that the evolution of cells in a tumor is driven by Darwinian selection has never been rigorously tested. Because selection greatly affects the level of intratumor genetic diversity, it is important to assess whether intratumor evolution follows the Darwinian or the non-Darwinian mode of evolution. To provide the statistical power, many regions in a single tumor need to be sampled and analyzed much more extensively than has been attempted in previous intratumor studies. Here, from a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tumor, we evaluated multiregional samples from the tumor, using either whole-exome sequencing (WES) (n = 23 samples) or genotyping (n = 286) under both the infinite-site and infinite-allele models of population genetics. In addition to the many single-nucleotide variations (SNVs) present in all samples, there were 35 "polymorphic" SNVs among samples. High genetic diversity was evident as the 23 WES samples defined 20 unique cell clones. With all 286 samples genotyped, clonal diversity agreed well with the non-Darwinian model with no evidence of positive Darwinian selection. Under the non-Darwinian model, MALL (the number of coding region mutations in the entire tumor) was estimated to be greater than 100 million in this tumor. DNA sequences reveal local diversities in small patches of cells and validate the estimation. In contrast, the genetic diversity under a Darwinian model would generally be orders of magnitude smaller. Because the level of genetic diversity will have implications on therapeutic resistance, non-Darwinian evolution should be heeded in cancer treatments even for microscopic tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cancer evolution; genetic diversity; intratumor heterogeneity; natural selection; neutral evolution

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26561581      PMCID: PMC4664355          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1519556112

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  60 in total

1.  Mutation selection and the natural history of cancer.

Authors:  J Cairns
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1975-05-15       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

Authors:  N Saitou; M Nei
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene.

Authors:  J M Smith; J Haigh
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1974-02       Impact factor: 1.588

Review 4.  Lessons from the cancer genome.

Authors:  Levi A Garraway; Eric S Lander
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Mathematical modeling of PDGF-driven glioblastoma reveals optimized radiation dosing schedules.

Authors:  Kevin Leder; Ken Pitter; Quincey LaPlant; Dolores Hambardzumyan; Brian D Ross; Timothy A Chan; Eric C Holland; Franziska Michor
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 6.  Cancer as an evolutionary and ecological process.

Authors:  Lauren M F Merlo; John W Pepper; Brian J Reid; Carlo C Maley
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Testing the neutral theory of molecular evolution with genomic data from Drosophila.

Authors:  Justin C Fay; Gerald J Wyckoff; Chung-I Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 8.  Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences.

Authors:  Andriy Marusyk; Kornelia Polyak
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2009-11-18

9.  Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila.

Authors:  J H McDonald; M Kreitman
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1991-06-20       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Intratumor heterogeneity in localized lung adenocarcinomas delineated by multiregion sequencing.

Authors:  Jianjun Zhang; Junya Fujimoto; Jianhua Zhang; David C Wedge; Xingzhi Song; Jiexin Zhang; Sahil Seth; Chi-Wan Chow; Yu Cao; Curtis Gumbs; Kathryn A Gold; Neda Kalhor; Latasha Little; Harshad Mahadeshwar; Cesar Moran; Alexei Protopopov; Huandong Sun; Jiabin Tang; Xifeng Wu; Yuanqing Ye; William N William; J Jack Lee; John V Heymach; Waun Ki Hong; Stephen Swisher; Ignacio I Wistuba; P Andrew Futreal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  125 in total

Review 1.  Genetic and non-genetic clonal diversity in cancer evolution.

Authors:  James R M Black; Nicholas McGranahan
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2021-03-16       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Single-cell analysis reveals cancer stem cell heterogeneity in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Hongping Zheng; Yotsawat Pomyen; Maria Olga Hernandez; Caiyi Li; Ferenc Livak; Wei Tang; Hien Dang; Tim F Greten; Jeremy L Davis; Yongmei Zhao; Monika Mehta; Yelena Levin; Jyoti Shetty; Bao Tran; Anuradha Budhu; Xin Wei Wang
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 17.425

3.  Evaluating optimal therapy robustness by virtual expansion of a sample population, with a case study in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Syndi Barish; Michael F Ochs; Eduardo D Sontag; Jana L Gevertz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Big Bang Tumor Growth and Clonal Evolution.

Authors:  Ruping Sun; Zheng Hu; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 5.  The evolution of tumour phylogenetics: principles and practice.

Authors:  Russell Schwartz; Alejandro A Schäffer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 53.242

6.  Coexisting genomic aberrations associated with lymph node metastasis in breast cancer.

Authors:  Li Bao; Zhaoyang Qian; Maria B Lyng; Ling Wang; Yuan Yu; Ting Wang; Xiuqing Zhang; Huanming Yang; Nils Brünner; Jun Wang; Henrik J Ditzel
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 14.808

7.  Emerging Frontiers in the Study of Molecular Evolution.

Authors:  David A Liberles; Belinda Chang; Kerry Geiler-Samerotte; Aaron Goldman; Jody Hey; Betül Kaçar; Michelle Meyer; William Murphy; David Posada; Andrew Storfer
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Harnessing Tumor Evolution to Circumvent Resistance.

Authors:  Katherine L Pogrebniak; Christina Curtis
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 11.639

Review 9.  Tumour heterogeneity and the evolutionary trade-offs of cancer.

Authors:  Jean Hausser; Uri Alon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 60.716

10.  Does the addition of drugs targeting the vascular endothelial growth factor pathway to first-line chemotherapy increase complete response? A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

Authors:  Yan Li; Xin-Yue Liang; Yi-Qi Yue; Lei Sheng; Ji-Kai Liu; Zhan-Yu Wang; Gang Chen
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-11-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.