Literature DB >> 29545467

A Simple Test Identifies Selection on Complex Traits.

Tim Beissinger1,2,3, Jochen Kruppa4,5, David Cavero6, Ngoc-Thuy Ha4, Malena Erbe7, Henner Simianer8.   

Abstract

Important traits in agricultural, natural, and human populations are increasingly being shown to be under the control of many genes that individually contribute only a small proportion of genetic variation. However, the majority of modern tools in quantitative and population genetics, including genome-wide association studies and selection-mapping protocols, are designed to identify individual genes with large effects. We have developed an approach to identify traits that have been under selection and are controlled by large numbers of loci. In contrast to existing methods, our technique uses additive-effects estimates from all available markers, and relates these estimates to allele-frequency change over time. Using this information, we generate a composite statistic, denoted [Formula: see text] which can be used to test for significant evidence of selection on a trait. Our test requires pre- and postselection genotypic data but only a single time point with phenotypic information. Simulations demonstrate that [Formula: see text] is powerful for identifying selection, particularly in situations where the trait being tested is controlled by many genes, which is precisely the scenario where classical approaches for selection mapping are least powerful. We apply this test to breeding populations of maize and chickens, where we demonstrate the successful identification of selection on traits that are documented to have been under selection.
Copyright © 2018 Beissinger et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  GenPred; Genomic Selection; Shared Data Resources; chickens; complex traits; maize; selection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29545467      PMCID: PMC5937188          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.300857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  46 in total

Review 1.  Shades of gray: the world of quantitative disease resistance.

Authors:  Jesse A Poland; Peter J Balint-Kurti; Randall J Wisser; Richard C Pratt; Rebecca J Nelson
Journal:  Trends Plant Sci       Date:  2008-12-04       Impact factor: 18.313

2.  Selection mapping of loci for quantitative disease resistance in a diverse maize population.

Authors:  Randall J Wisser; Seth C Murray; Judith M Kolkman; Hernán Ceballos; Rebecca J Nelson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions.

Authors:  P M VanRaden
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 4.  Reconstructing ancient genomes and epigenomes.

Authors:  Ludovic Orlando; M Thomas P Gilbert; Eske Willerslev
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-06-09       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  Recent demography drives changes in linked selection across the maize genome.

Authors:  Timothy M Beissinger; Li Wang; Kate Crosby; Arun Durvasula; Matthew B Hufford; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra
Journal:  Nat Plants       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 15.793

6.  Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height.

Authors:  Jian Yang; Beben Benyamin; Brian P McEvoy; Scott Gordon; Anjali K Henders; Dale R Nyholt; Pamela A Madden; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Grant W Montgomery; Michael E Goddard; Peter M Visscher
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2010-06-20       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Constructing genomic maps of positive selection in humans: where do we go from here?

Authors:  Joshua M Akey
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 9.043

8.  A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome.

Authors:  Martin W Ganal; Gregor Durstewitz; Andreas Polley; Aurélie Bérard; Edward S Buckler; Alain Charcosset; Joseph D Clarke; Eva-Maria Graner; Mark Hansen; Johann Joets; Marie-Christine Le Paslier; Michael D McMullen; Pierre Montalent; Mark Rose; Chris-Carolin Schön; Qi Sun; Hildrun Walter; Olivier C Martin; Matthieu Falque
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The genetics of human adaptation: hard sweeps, soft sweeps, and polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jonathan K Pritchard; Joseph K Pickrell; Graham Coop
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 10.834

10.  A population genetic signal of polygenic adaptation.

Authors:  Jeremy J Berg; Graham Coop
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 5.917

View more
  5 in total

1.  Detecting Adaptive Differentiation in Structured Populations with Genomic Data and Common Gardens.

Authors:  Emily B Josephs; Jeremy J Berg; Jeffrey Ross-Ibarra; Graham Coop
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Polygenic adaptation: a unifying framework to understand positive selection.

Authors:  Neda Barghi; Joachim Hermisson; Christian Schlötterer
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 53.242

3.  Genome-Wide Signatures of Selection Detection in Three South China Indigenous Pigs.

Authors:  Shuqi Diao; Shuwen Huang; Zitao Chen; Jinyan Teng; Yunlong Ma; Xiaolong Yuan; Zanmou Chen; Hao Zhang; Jiaqi Li; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 4.096

4.  Insights into the architecture of human-induced polygenic selection in Duroc pigs.

Authors:  Zitao Chen; Jinyan Teng; Shuqi Diao; Zhiting Xu; Shaopan Ye; Dingjie Qiu; Zhe Zhang; Yuchun Pan; Jiaqi Li; Qin Zhang; Zhe Zhang
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2022-09-21

5.  Unique genetic signatures of local adaptation over space and time for diapause, an ecologically relevant complex trait, in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Priscilla A Erickson; Cory A Weller; Daniel Y Song; Alyssa S Bangerter; Paul Schmidt; Alan O Bergland
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 6.020

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.