Literature DB >> 29545466

Reexamining Dis/Similarity-Based Tests for Rare-Variant Association with Case-Control Samples.

Charlotte Wang1, Jung-Ying Tzeng2,3,4,5, Pei-Zhen Wu6, Martin Preisig7, Chuhsing Kate Hsiao2.   

Abstract

A properly designed distance-based measure can capture informative genetic differences among individuals with different phenotypes and can be used to detect variants responsible for the phenotypes. To detect associated variants, various tests have been designed to contrast genetic dissimilarity or similarity scores of certain subject groups in different ways, among which the most widely used strategy is to quantify the difference between the within-group genetic dissimilarity/similarity (i.e., case-case and control-control similarities) and the between-group dissimilarity/similarity (i.e., case-control similarities). While it has been noted that for common variants, the within-group and the between-group measures should all be included; in this work, we show that for rare variants, comparison based on the two within-group measures can more effectively quantify the genetic difference between cases and controls. The between-group measure tends to overlap with one of the two within-group measures for rare variants, although such overlap is not present for common variants. Consequently, a dissimilarity or similarity test that includes the between-group information tends to attenuate the association signals and leads to power loss. Based on these findings, we propose a dissimilarity test that compares the degree of SNP dissimilarity within cases to that within controls to better characterize the difference between two disease phenotypes. We provide the statistical properties, asymptotic distribution, and computation details for a small sample size of the proposed test. We use simulated and real sequence data to assess the performance of the proposed test, comparing it with other rare-variant methods including those similarity-based tests that use both within-group and between-group information. As similarity-based approaches serve as one of the dominating approaches in rare-variant analysis, our results provide some insight for the effective detection of rare variants.
Copyright © 2018 by the Genetics Society of America.

Keywords:  U-statistics; cross-sample comparison; within-sample comparison

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29545466      PMCID: PMC5937191          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.300769

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  34 in total

Review 1.  CNVs: harbingers of a rare variant revolution in psychiatric genetics.

Authors:  Dheeraj Malhotra; Jonathan Sebat
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Optimal tests for rare variant effects in sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Seunggeun Lee; Michael C Wu; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Genomic similarity and kernel methods I: advancements by building on mathematical and statistical foundations.

Authors:  Daniel J Schaid
Journal:  Hum Hered       Date:  2010-07-03       Impact factor: 0.444

4.  A general framework for detecting disease associations with rare variants in sequencing studies.

Authors:  Dan-Yu Lin; Zheng-Zheng Tang
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Ghrelin mediates stress-induced food-reward behavior in mice.

Authors:  Jen-Chieh Chuang; Mario Perello; Ichiro Sakata; Sherri Osborne-Lawrence; Joseph M Savitt; Michael Lutter; Jeffrey M Zigman
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  CHRNA5 and CHRNA3 variants and level of neuroticism in young adult Mexican American men and women.

Authors:  José R Criado; Ian R Gizer; Howard J Edenberg; Cindy L Ehlers
Journal:  Twin Res Hum Genet       Date:  2014-03-03       Impact factor: 1.587

7.  Detecting rare variant effects using extreme phenotype sampling in sequencing association studies.

Authors:  Ian J Barnett; Seunggeun Lee; Xihong Lin
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-26       Impact factor: 2.135

8.  Identification and characterization of PDE4A11, a novel, widely expressed long isoform encoded by the human PDE4A cAMP phosphodiesterase gene.

Authors:  Derek A Wallace; Lee Ann Johnston; Elaine Huston; Douglas MacMaster; Thomas M Houslay; York-Fong Cheung; Lachlan Campbell; Jenni E Millen; Robin A Smith; Irene Gall; Richard G Knowles; Michael Sullivan; Miles D Houslay
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 4.436

9.  A groupwise association test for rare mutations using a weighted sum statistic.

Authors:  Bo Eskerod Madsen; Sharon R Browning
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2009-02-13       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  Using Hamming Distance as Information for SNP-Sets Clustering and Testing in Disease Association Studies.

Authors:  Charlotte Wang; Wen-Hsin Kao; Chuhsing Kate Hsiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.