Literature DB >> 29545055

Imaging the High-risk Prostate Cancer Patient: Current and Future Approaches to Staging.

Marc A Bjurlin1, Baris Turkbey2, Andrew B Rosenkrantz3, Sonia Gaur2, Peter L Choyke2, Samir S Taneja4.   

Abstract

Imaging is critically important for the diagnosis, staging, and management of men with high-risk prostate cancer. Conventional imaging modalities have been employed for local and metastatic staging with limited performance. Sodium fluoride positron emission tomography is recommended when there is high suspicion of bone metastases despite a negative or indeterminate bone scan. Magnetic resonance imaging has advantages in local staging but its value depends on the extent of disease. Whole-body positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging could provide both local and distant staging. None of the existing positron emission tomography agents are recommended in practice guidelines; however, among them, prostate-specific membrane antigen-based tracers seem to hold the most promise based on sensitivity and specificity.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29545055     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  6 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 2.  Novel Imaging in Detection of Metastatic Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Clayton P Smith; Anna Laucis; Stephanie Harmon; Esther Mena; Liza Lindenberg; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Comparison of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in clinical translation research for diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Sagnik Sengupta; Mena Asha Krishnan; Sudeshna Chattopadhyay; Venkatesh Chelvam
Journal:  Cancer Rep (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-04-02

4.  North American population-based validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Practice Guideline Recommendations for locoregional lymph node and bone imaging in prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Felix Preisser; Elio Mazzone; Sebastiano Nazzani; Michele Marchioni; Marco Bandini; Zhe Tian; Fred Saad; Denis Soulières; Shahrokh F Shariat; Francesco Montorsi; Hartwig Huland; Markus Graefen; Derya Tilki; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 5.  Imaging diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Kate Downey; Anna Rotili; Enrico Cassano; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-06-16

Review 6.  Surgical management of high-risk, localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lamont J Wilkins; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Debasish Sundi; Ashley E Ross; Dominic Grimberg; Eric A Klein; Brian F Chapin; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 14.432

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.