Literature DB >> 29545046

Modified Mechanical Percussion for Upper Urinary Tract Stone Fragments After Extracorporeal Shock Wave Lithotripsy: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

Suoshi Jing1, Bo Liu2, Wengang Lan3, Xin Zhao1, Junsheng Bao1, Junlin Ma1, Zhimin Liu2, Hongyan Liu3, Tiejun Pan2, Jianggen Yang3, Dan Wu1, Youli Zhao1, Yuhan Wang1, Zhiping Wang4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of modified mechanical percussion for eliminating upper urinary tract stone fragments after extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We assigned patients aged 18-60 years with upper urinary tract calculi to the modified mechanical percussion (trial) or observation (control) group. Kidney-ureter-bladder radiography and ultrasound were used for diagnostic evaluation. The primary outcome was the stone-expulsion rate (SER) at 6 hours. The first stone-expulsion time, the SER at 3, 12, and 24 hours, the stone-free rate, additional interventions, and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.
RESULTS: A total of 120 patients underwent randomization: 60 for each group. The mean first stone-expulsion time in the trial and control groups was 6.75 and 13.58 hours, respectively (P = .001). The SERs at 3, 6, and 12 hours in the trial group were 51.8%, 75.4%, and 76.8%, respectively, which were higher than the control group (all P <.05). Among patients who expelled fragments within 6 hours, the stone-free rates were improved at 1 week (P = .002) and at 2 weeks (P = .000). Patients needed fewer additional interventions in the trial group (P = .035). AEs occurred in 42.9% (24 of 56) and 67.9% (38 of 56) of the patients in the trial and control groups, respectively (P = .008). Age, gender, stone size and location, and SER at 24 hours did not differ significantly among the groups.
CONCLUSION: Modified mechanical percussion significantly improved SERs and accelerated stone passage after shock wave lithotripsy, resulting in a stone-free status with a lower risk of AEs and reduced need for additional interventions.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29545046     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.12.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  How to maximize the efficacy of shockwave lithotripsy.

Authors:  Neophytos Petrides; Safiyah Ismail; Faqar Anjum; Seshadri Sriprasad
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2020-10-30

Review 2.  Effect of mechanical percussion combined with patient position change on the elimination of upper urinary stones/fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tao Zeng; Hans-Göran Tiselius; Jian Huang; Tuo Deng; Guohua Zeng; Wenqi Wu
Journal:  Urolithiasis       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 3.  Clinical application of the therapeutic ultrasound in urologic disease: Part II of therapeutic ultrasound in urology.

Authors:  Minh-Tung Do; Tam Hoai Ly; Min Joo Choi; Sung Yong Cho
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2022-05-16

4.  Is physical therapy effective following extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy and retrograde intrarenal surgery: a meta-analysis and systematic review.

Authors:  Linjie Peng; Junjun Wen; Wen Zhong; Guohua Zeng
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 2.264

5.  A single center study that evaluates the preclinical use of a newly developed software and moving bed system to facilitate the spontaneous excretion of residual fragments after primary stone treatment (RIRS or PCNL).

Authors:  Tao Yang; Rijin Song; Xianghu Meng; Hanping Wei; Xinying Jiang; Xiaoliang Yuan; Xiaowu Liu; Zhimin Jiao; Jun Liu; Honglei Shi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.