Literature DB >> 29545005

OB Nest: Reimagining Low-Risk Prenatal Care.

Marnie J Meylor de Mooij1, Rachael L Hodny2, Daniel A O'Neil3, Matthew R Gardner4, Mekayla Beaver5, Andrea T Brown6, Barbara A Barry3, Lorna M Ross7, Amy J Jasik8, Katharine M Nesbitt8, Susan M Sobolewski9, Susan M Skinner8, Rajeev Chaudhry10, Brian C Brost11, Bobbie S Gostout8, Roger W Harms8.   

Abstract

Using a human-centered design method, our team sought to envision a new model of care for women experiencing low-risk pregnancy. This model, called OB Nest, aimed to demedicalize the experience of pregnancy by providing a supportive and empowering experience that fits within patients' daily lives. To explore this topic, we invited women to use self-monitoring tools, a text-based smartphone application to communicate with their care team, and moderated online communities to connect with other pregnant women. Through observations of tool use and patient- and care team-provided feedback, we found that self-measurement and access to a fetal heart monitor provided women with confidence and joy in the progress of their pregnancies while shifting their position to being an active participant in their care. The smartphone application gave women direct access to their care team, provided continuity, and removed hurdles in establishing communication. The online community platform was a space where women in the same obstetric clinic could share nonmedical questions and advice with one another. This created a sense of community, leveraged the knowledge of women, and provided a venue beyond the clinic visit for information exchange. These findings were integrated into the design of the Mayo Clinic OB Nest model. This model redistributes care based on the individual needs of patients by providing self-measurement tools and continuous flexible access to their care team. By enabling women to meaningfully participate in their care, there is potential for cost savings and improved patient satisfaction.
Copyright © 2018 Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29545005     DOI: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2018.01.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc        ISSN: 0025-6196            Impact factor:   7.616


  14 in total

1.  Elevating mothers' voices: recommendations for improved patient-centered postpartum.

Authors:  Sarah Verbiest; Kristin Tully; Monica Simpson; Alison Stuebe
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2018-08-09

Review 2.  Telehealth for the Management of Diabetes in Pregnancy.

Authors:  Noelia M Zork
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2022-07-09       Impact factor: 5.430

3.  OB Nest randomized controlled trial: a cost comparison of reduced visit compared to traditional prenatal care.

Authors:  Regan N Theiler; Yvonne Butler-Tobah; Matthew A Hathcock; Abimbola Famuyide
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Delivering Perinatal Health Information via a Voice Interactive App (SMILE): Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Lisa Militello; Emre Sezgin; Yungui Huang; Simon Lin
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2021-03-01

5.  Using human centered design to identify opportunities for reducing inequities in perinatal care.

Authors:  Malini A Nijagal; Devika Patel; Courtney Lyles; Jennifer Liao; Lara Chehab; Schyneida Williams; Amanda Sammann
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Perspectives of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: A qualitative study.

Authors:  Kiran Atmuri; Mahbub Sarkar; Efe Obudu; Arunaz Kumar
Journal:  Women Birth       Date:  2021-03-15       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Patient Preferences for Prenatal and Postpartum Care Delivery: A Survey of Postpartum Women.

Authors:  Alex Friedman Peahl; Alli Novara; Michele Heisler; Vanessa K Dalton; Michelle H Moniz; Roger D Smith
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2020-05       Impact factor: 7.623

8.  Implementation of Obstetric Telehealth During COVID-19 and Beyond.

Authors:  Kimberly Fryer; Arlin Delgado; Tara Foti; Chinyere N Reid; Jennifer Marshall
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2020-09

9.  Telehealth for High-Risk Pregnancies in the Setting of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Authors:  Aleha Aziz; Noelia Zork; Janice J Aubey; Caitlin D Baptiste; Mary E D'Alton; Ukachi N Emeruwa; Karin M Fuchs; Dena Goffman; Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman; Jennifer H Haythe; Anita P LaSala; Nigel Madden; Eliza C Miller; Russell S Miller; Catherine Monk; Leslie Moroz; Samsiya Ona; Laurence E Ring; Jean-Ju Sheen; Erica S Spiegel; Lynn L Simpson; Hope S Yates; Alexander M Friedman
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Widespread implementation of a low-cost telehealth service in the delivery of antenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic: an interrupted time-series analysis.

Authors:  Kirsten R Palmer; Michael Tanner; Miranda Davies-Tuck; Andrea Rindt; Kerrie Papacostas; Michelle L Giles; Kate Brown; Helen Diamandis; Rebecca Fradkin; Alice E Stewart; Daniel L Rolnik; Andrew Stripp; Euan M Wallace; Ben W Mol; Ryan J Hodges
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.