Literature DB >> 10798462

Binocular vision in older people with adventitious visual impairment: sometimes one eye is better than two.

J Faubert1, O Overbury.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of adventitious visual impairment (low vision) on monocular and binocular spatial contrast sensitivity of older people.
DESIGN: A between-within repeated measures design. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-nine older adults between the ages of 50 and 96; 49 of the observers had age-related macular degeneration (AMD). MEASURES: Visual acuity screening and spatial contrast sensitivity.
RESULTS: In almost half of the population with AMD, the sensitivity to spatial information, as measured by spatial contrast sensitivity, is worse when both eyes are used than when the stimuli are viewed with only one eye. This "binocular inhibition" is not related to the contrast sensitivity of the better eye or to acuities. Furthermore, this inhibition process is reflected primarily in images with medium to low spatial frequency components (medium to large size bars).
CONCLUSIONS: These results have important implications for understanding the functional impact of low vision in older people. They suggest that almost one-half of older people with AMD view the world best using only one of their eyes, whereas for the other half, there is an advantage to using binocular vision for certain visual tasks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10798462     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb04693.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc        ISSN: 0002-8614            Impact factor:   5.562


  9 in total

1.  Monocular vs. binocular measurement of spatial vision in elders.

Authors:  Marilyn E Schneck; Gunilla Haegerstöm-Portnoy; Lori A Lott; John A Brabyn
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Visual search with image modification in age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Emily Wiecek; Mary Lou Jackson; Steven C Dakin; Peter Bex
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-25       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Rehabilitation Referral for Patients With Irreversible Vision Impairment Seen in a Public Safety-Net Eye Clinic.

Authors:  M Austin Coker; Carrie E Huisingh; Gerald McGwin; Russell W Read; Mark W Swanson; Laura E Dreer; Dawn K DeCarlo; Lindsay Gregg; Cynthia Owsley
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 7.389

4.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 5.  Binocular visual function and fixational control in patients with macular disease: A review.

Authors:  Irina Sverdlichenko; Mark S Mandelcorn; Galia Issashar Leibovitzh; Efrem D Mandelcorn; Samuel N Markowitz; Luminita Tarita-Nistor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2021-12-04       Impact factor: 3.992

6.  Changes in Fixation Stability with Time during Binocular and Monocular Viewing in Maculopathy.

Authors:  Saba Samet; Esther G González; Mark S Mandelcorn; Michael H Brent; Luminita Tarita-Nistor
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-10-23

7.  Reading with central vision loss: binocular summation and inhibition.

Authors:  Valeria Silvestri; Paola Sasso; Paola Piscopo; Filippo Amore; Stanislao Rizzo; Robert G Devenyi; Luminita Tarita-Nistor
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2020-09-04       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 8.  Topical Review: Assessment of Binocular Sensory Processes in Low Vision.

Authors:  Janelle Tong; Jessie Huang; Vincent Khou; Jodi Martin; Michael Kalloniatis; Angelica Ly
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 2.106

9.  Depth Perception and Grasp in Central Field Loss.

Authors:  Preeti Verghese; Terence L Tyson; Saeideh Ghahghaei; Donald C Fletcher
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.