Sang Min Yoon1, Baek-Yeol Ryoo2, So Jung Lee3, Jong Hoon Kim1, Ji Hoon Shin3, Ji Hyun An4, Han Chu Lee4, Young-Suk Lim4. 1. Department of Radiation Oncology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Oncology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Abstract
Importance: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma showing macroscopic vascular invasion have a poor prognosis. Sorafenib is the sole treatment option for these patients, with unsatisfactory response and survival benefit. Combined treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus external beam radiotherapy (RT) has shown promising results for these patients in observational studies. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE plus RT compared with sorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and macroscopic vascular invasion. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted at an academic tertiary care center between July 1, 2013, and October 31, 2016, 90 treatment-naive patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma showing macroscopic vascular invasion were randomly assigned to receive sorafenib (400 mg twice daily; 45 participants [the sorafenib group]) or TACE (every 6 weeks) plus RT (within 3 weeks after the first TACE, maximum 45 Gy with the fraction size of 2.5 to 3 Gy; 45 participants [the TACE-RT group]). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the 12-week progression-free survival rate by intention-to-treat analysis. Radiologic response was assessed by independent review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). Treatment crossover was permitted after confirming disease progression. Results: Of the 90 patients (median age, 55 years; range, 33-82 years), 77 were men and 13 were women. All patients had portal vein invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh class A liver function. The median maximal tumor diameter was 9.7 cm. Most patients (71 [78.9%]) had multiple lesions. At week 12, the progression-free survival rate was significantly higher in the TACE-RT group than the sorafenib group (86.7% vs 34.3%; P < .001). The TACE-RT group showed a significantly higher radiologic response rate than the sorafenib group at 24 weeks (15 [33.3%] vs 1 [2.2%]; P < .001), a significantly longer median time to progression (31.0 vs 11.7 weeks; P < .001), and significantly longer overall survival (55.0 vs 43.0 weeks; P = .04). Curative surgical resection was conducted for 5 patients (11.1%) in the TACE-RT group owing to downstaging. No patients in the TACE-RT group discontinued treatment owing to hepatic decompensation. Conclusions and Relevance: For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma showing macroscopic vascular invasion, first-line treatment with TACE plus RT was well tolerated and provided an improved progression-free survival, objective response rate, time to progression, and overall survival compared with sorafenib treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01901692.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma showing macroscopic vascular invasion have a poor prognosis. Sorafenib is the sole treatment option for these patients, with unsatisfactory response and survival benefit. Combined treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus external beam radiotherapy (RT) has shown promising results for these patients in observational studies. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE plus RT compared with sorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and macroscopic vascular invasion. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this randomized, open-label clinical trial conducted at an academic tertiary care center between July 1, 2013, and October 31, 2016, 90 treatment-naive patients with liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma showing macroscopic vascular invasion were randomly assigned to receive sorafenib (400 mg twice daily; 45 participants [the sorafenib group]) or TACE (every 6 weeks) plus RT (within 3 weeks after the first TACE, maximum 45 Gy with the fraction size of 2.5 to 3 Gy; 45 participants [the TACE-RT group]). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the 12-week progression-free survival rate by intention-to-treat analysis. Radiologic response was assessed by independent review according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST; version 1.1). Treatment crossover was permitted after confirming disease progression. Results: Of the 90 patients (median age, 55 years; range, 33-82 years), 77 were men and 13 were women. All patients had portal vein invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma and Child-Pugh class A liver function. The median maximal tumor diameter was 9.7 cm. Most patients (71 [78.9%]) had multiple lesions. At week 12, the progression-free survival rate was significantly higher in the TACE-RT group than the sorafenib group (86.7% vs 34.3%; P < .001). The TACE-RT group showed a significantly higher radiologic response rate than the sorafenib group at 24 weeks (15 [33.3%] vs 1 [2.2%]; P < .001), a significantly longer median time to progression (31.0 vs 11.7 weeks; P < .001), and significantly longer overall survival (55.0 vs 43.0 weeks; P = .04). Curative surgical resection was conducted for 5 patients (11.1%) in the TACE-RT group owing to downstaging. No patients in the TACE-RT group discontinued treatment owing to hepatic decompensation. Conclusions and Relevance: For patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma showing macroscopic vascular invasion, first-line treatment with TACE plus RT was well tolerated and provided an improved progression-free survival, objective response rate, time to progression, and overall survival compared with sorafenib treatment. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01901692.
Authors: J M Llovet; J Bustamante; A Castells; R Vilana; M del C Ayuso; M Sala; C Brú; J Rodés; J Bruix Journal: Hepatology Date: 1999-01 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Sang Min Yoon; Young-Suk Lim; Hyung Jin Won; Jong Hoon Kim; Kang Mo Kim; Han Chu Lee; Young-Hwa Chung; Yung Sang Lee; Sung Gyu Lee; Jin-Hong Park; Dong Jin Suh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2011-05-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Gonzalo Sapisochin; Aisling Barry; Mark Doherty; Sandra Fischer; Nicolas Goldaracena; Roizar Rosales; Moises Russo; Rob Beecroft; Anand Ghanekar; Mamatha Bhat; James Brierley; Paul D Greig; Jennifer J Knox; Laura A Dawson; David R Grant Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2017-02-28 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Gi-Ae Kim; Ju Hyun Shim; Sang Min Yoon; Jinhong Jung; Jong Hoon Kim; Min-Hee Ryu; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; Yoon-Koo Kang; Danbi Lee; Kang Mo Kim; Young-Suk Lim; Han Chu Lee; Young-Hwa Chung; Yung Sang Lee Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2015-01-19 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: Henrik Petrowsky; Ralph Fritsch; Matthias Guckenberger; Michelle L De Oliveira; Philipp Dutkowski; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Mark Yarchoan; Parul Agarwal; Augusto Villanueva; Shuyun Rao; Laura A Dawson; Josep M Llovet; Richard S Finn; John D Groopman; Hashem B El-Serag; Satdarshan P Monga; Xin Wei Wang; Michael Karin; Robert E Schwartz; Kenneth K Tanabe; Lewis R Roberts; Preethi H Gunaratne; Allan Tsung; Kimberly A Brown; Theodore S Lawrence; Riad Salem; Amit G Singal; Amy K Kim; Atoosa Rabiee; Linda Resar; Yujin Hoshida; Aiwu Ruth He; Kalpana Ghoshal; Patrick B Ryan; Elizabeth M Jaffee; Chandan Guha; Lopa Mishra; C Norman Coleman; Mansoor M Ahmed Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 12.701