Gonzalo Sapisochin1, Aisling Barry2, Mark Doherty3, Sandra Fischer4, Nicolas Goldaracena5, Roizar Rosales6, Moises Russo2, Rob Beecroft7, Anand Ghanekar5, Mamatha Bhat6, James Brierley2, Paul D Greig5, Jennifer J Knox3, Laura A Dawson2, David R Grant5. 1. Multi-Organ Transplant, Toronto General Surgery, Canada; Department of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: gonzalo.sapisochin@uhn.ca. 2. Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada. 3. Department of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Canada. 4. Department of Pathology, University of Toronto, Canada. 5. Multi-Organ Transplant, Toronto General Surgery, Canada; Department of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Canada. 6. Multi-Organ Transplant, Toronto General Surgery, Canada. 7. Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is limited information on the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a bridge to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and no study comparing its efficacy to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We aimed to ascertain the safety and efficacy of SBRT on an intention-to-treat basis compared with TACE and RFA as a bridge to liver transplantation in a large cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Outcomes between groups were compared from the time of listing and from the time of transplant. Between July 2004 and December 2014, 379 patients were treated with either SBRT (n=36, SBRT group), TACE (n=99, TACE group) or RFA (n=244, RFA group). RESULTS: The drop-out rate was similar between groups (16.7% SBRT group vs. 20.2% TACE group and 16.8% RFA group, p=0.7); 30 patients were transplanted in the SBRT group, 79 in the TACE group and 203 in the RFA group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Patients in the RFA group had more tumor necrosis in the explant. The 1-, 3- and 5-year actuarial patient survival from the time of listing was 83%, 61% and 61% in the SBRT group vs. 86%, 61% and 56% in the TACE group, and 86%, 72% and 61% in the RFA group, p=0.4. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival from the time of transplant was 83%, 75% and 75% in the SBRT group vs. 96%, 75% and 69% in the TACE group, and 95%, 81% and 73% in the RFA group, p=0.7. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SBRT can be safely utilized as a bridge to LT in patients with HCC, as an alternative to conventional bridging therapies. LAY SUMMARY: Patients with liver cancer included in the waiting list for liver transplantation are at risk of tumor progression and death. Stereotactic body radiotherapy may be a good alternative to conventional therapies to reduce this risk.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: There is limited information on the use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as a bridge to liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma and no study comparing its efficacy to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). We aimed to ascertain the safety and efficacy of SBRT on an intention-to-treat basis compared with TACE and RFA as a bridge to liver transplantation in a large cohort of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. METHODS: Outcomes between groups were compared from the time of listing and from the time of transplant. Between July 2004 and December 2014, 379 patients were treated with either SBRT (n=36, SBRT group), TACE (n=99, TACE group) or RFA (n=244, RFA group). RESULTS: The drop-out rate was similar between groups (16.7% SBRT group vs. 20.2% TACE group and 16.8% RFA group, p=0.7); 30 patients were transplanted in the SBRT group, 79 in the TACE group and 203 in the RFA group. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Patients in the RFA group had more tumor necrosis in the explant. The 1-, 3- and 5-year actuarial patient survival from the time of listing was 83%, 61% and 61% in the SBRT group vs. 86%, 61% and 56% in the TACE group, and 86%, 72% and 61% in the RFA group, p=0.4. The 1-, 3- and 5-year survival from the time of transplant was 83%, 75% and 75% in the SBRT group vs. 96%, 75% and 69% in the TACE group, and 95%, 81% and 73% in the RFA group, p=0.7. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, SBRT can be safely utilized as a bridge to LT in patients with HCC, as an alternative to conventional bridging therapies. LAY SUMMARY:Patients with liver cancer included in the waiting list for liver transplantation are at risk of tumor progression and death. Stereotactic body radiotherapy may be a good alternative to conventional therapies to reduce this risk.
Authors: Jennifer Pursley; Issam El Naqa; Nina N Sanford; Bridget Noe; Jennifer Y Wo; Christine E Eyler; Matthew Hwang; Kristy K Brock; Beow Y Yeap; John A Wolfgang; Theodore S Hong; Clemens Grassberger Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2020-04-27 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Saleh A Alqahtani; Faisal M Sanai; Ashwaq Alolayan; Faisal Abaalkhail; Hamad Alsuhaibani; Mazen Hassanain; Waleed Alhazzani; Abdullah Alsuhaibani; Abdullah Algarni; Alejandro Forner; Richard S Finn; Waleed K Al-Hamoudi Journal: Saudi J Gastroenterol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 2.485
Authors: Lei Chen; Xiaopeng Guo; Shi Chen; Yanqiao Ren; Tao Sun; Fan Yang; Chuansheng Zheng Journal: Am J Transl Res Date: 2021-01-15 Impact factor: 4.060
Authors: Henrik Petrowsky; Ralph Fritsch; Matthias Guckenberger; Michelle L De Oliveira; Philipp Dutkowski; Pierre-Alain Clavien Journal: Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-07-17 Impact factor: 46.802
Authors: Sang Min Yoon; Baek-Yeol Ryoo; So Jung Lee; Jong Hoon Kim; Ji Hoon Shin; Ji Hyun An; Han Chu Lee; Young-Suk Lim Journal: JAMA Oncol Date: 2018-05-01 Impact factor: 31.777
Authors: Ashwathy Susan Mathew; Eshetu G Atenafu; Dawn Owen; Chris Maurino; Anthony Brade; James Brierley; Robert Dinniwell; John Kim; Charles Cho; Jolie Ringash; Rebecca Wong; Kyle Cuneo; Mary Feng; Theodore S Lawrence; Laura A Dawson Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2020-05-24 Impact factor: 9.162