Literature DB >> 29542266

Symbouki: a meta-analysis on the emergence of sound symbolism in early language acquisition.

Mathilde Fort1,2, Imme Lammertink3, Sharon Peperkamp4,5, Adriana Guevara-Rukoz4, Paula Fikkert6, Sho Tsuji4,7.   

Abstract

Adults and toddlers systematically associate pseudowords such as "bouba" and "kiki" with round and spiky shapes, respectively, a sound symbolic phenomenon known as the "bouba-kiki effect". To date, whether this sound symbolic effect is a property of the infant brain present at birth or is a learned aspect of language perception remains unknown. Yet, solving this question is fundamental for our understanding of early language acquisition. Indeed, an early sensitivity to such sound symbolic associations could provide a powerful mechanism for language learning, playing a bootstrapping role in the establishment of novel sound-meaning associations. The aim of the present meta-analysis (SymBouKi) is to provide a quantitative overview of the emergence of the bouba-kiki effect in infancy and early childhood. It allows a high-powered assessment of the true sound symbolic effect size by pooling over the entire set of 11 extant studies (six published, five unpublished), entailing data from 425 participants between 4 and 38 months of age. The quantitative data provide statistical support for a moderate, but significant, sound symbolic effect. Further analysis found a greater sensitivity to sound symbolism for bouba-type pseudowords (i.e., round sound-shape correspondences) than for kiki-type pseudowords (i.e., spiky sound-shape correspondences). For the kiki-type pseudowords, the effect emerged with age. Such discrepancy challenges the view that sensitivity to sound symbolism is an innate language mechanism rooted in an exuberant interconnected brain. We propose alternative hypotheses where both innate and learned mechanisms are at play in the emergence of sensitivity to sound symbolic relationships.
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29542266     DOI: 10.1111/desc.12659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Sci        ISSN: 1363-755X


  7 in total

1.  Sound symbolism shapes the English language: The maluma/takete effect in English nouns.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Chris Westbury; Geoff Hollis; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-04-05

2.  Action sound-shape congruencies explain sound symbolism.

Authors:  Konstantina Margiotoudi; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  The bouba/kiki effect is robust across cultures and writing systems.

Authors:  Aleksandra Ćwiek; Susanne Fuchs; Christoph Draxler; Eva Liina Asu; Dan Dediu; Katri Hiovain; Shigeto Kawahara; Sofia Koutalidis; Manfred Krifka; Pärtel Lippus; Gary Lupyan; Grace E Oh; Jing Paul; Caterina Petrone; Rachid Ridouane; Sabine Reiter; Nathalie Schümchen; Ádám Szalontai; Özlem Ünal-Logacev; Jochen Zeller; Marcus Perlman; Bodo Winter
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Visual Iconicity Across Sign Languages: Large-Scale Automated Video Analysis of Iconic Articulators and Locations.

Authors:  Robert Östling; Carl Börstell; Servane Courtaux
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-05-15

5.  Is un stylo sharper than une épée? Investigating the interaction of sound symbolism and grammatical gender in English and French speakers.

Authors:  David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman; Jean Saint-Aubin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Iconicity in Word Learning and Beyond: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Alan Ks Nielsen; Mark Dingemanse
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 1.500

7.  Bo-NO-bouba-kiki: picture-word mapping but no spontaneous sound symbolic speech-shape mapping in a language trained bonobo.

Authors:  Konstantina Margiotoudi; Manuel Bohn; Natalie Schwob; Jared Taglialatela; Friedemann Pulvermüller; Amanda Epping; Ken Schweller; Matthias Allritz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.