Hanna Ferløv Schwensen1, Carol Kan2, Janet Treasure3, Niels Høiby4, Magnus Sjögren5,6. 1. Mental Health Center Ballerup, Ballerup, Denmark. 2. Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK. 3. Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK. 4. Department Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. 5. Mental Health Center Ballerup, Ballerup, Denmark. jan.magnus.sjoegren@regionh.dk. 6. Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. jan.magnus.sjoegren@regionh.dk.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a poorly understood and often chronic condition. Deviations in the gut microbiota have been reported to influence the gut-brain axis in other disorders. Therefore, if present in AN, it may impact on symptoms and illness progression. A review of the gut microbiota studies in AN is presented. METHOD: A literature search on PubMed yielded 27 articles; 14 were selected and based on relevance, 9 articles were included. The findings were interpreted in the larger context of preclinical research and clinical observations. RESULTS: 8 out of 9 included studies analysed microbiota from faeces samples, while the last analysed a protein in plasma produced by the gut. Two studies were longitudinal and included an intervention (i.e., weight restoration), five were cross-sectional, one was a case report, and the last was a case series consisting of three cases. Deviations in abundance, diversity, and microbial composition of the faecal microbiota in AN were found. CONCLUSION: There are currently only a few studies on the gut microbiota in AN, all done on faeces samples, and not all describe the microbiota at the species level extensively. The Archaeon Methanobrevibacter smithii was increased in participants with a BMI < 25 in one study and specifically in AN patients in three studies. Methanobrevibacter smithii may, if detected, be a benchmark biomarker for future studies. We propose that microbiota samples could also be collected from the small intestine, where a major exchange of nutrients takes place and where the microbiota may have a biological impact on AN.
PURPOSE:Anorexia nervosa (AN) is a poorly understood and often chronic condition. Deviations in the gut microbiota have been reported to influence the gut-brain axis in other disorders. Therefore, if present in AN, it may impact on symptoms and illness progression. A review of the gut microbiota studies in AN is presented. METHOD: A literature search on PubMed yielded 27 articles; 14 were selected and based on relevance, 9 articles were included. The findings were interpreted in the larger context of preclinical research and clinical observations. RESULTS: 8 out of 9 included studies analysed microbiota from faeces samples, while the last analysed a protein in plasma produced by the gut. Two studies were longitudinal and included an intervention (i.e., weight restoration), five were cross-sectional, one was a case report, and the last was a case series consisting of three cases. Deviations in abundance, diversity, and microbial composition of the faecal microbiota in AN were found. CONCLUSION: There are currently only a few studies on the gut microbiota in AN, all done on faeces samples, and not all describe the microbiota at the species level extensively. The Archaeon Methanobrevibacter smithii was increased in participants with a BMI < 25 in one study and specifically in AN patients in three studies. Methanobrevibacter smithii may, if detected, be a benchmark biomarker for future studies. We propose that microbiota samples could also be collected from the small intestine, where a major exchange of nutrients takes place and where the microbiota may have a biological impact on AN.
Entities:
Keywords:
Anorexia nervosa; Biomarker; Faeces; Microbiota; Species
Authors: Alia A Hussain; Christopher Hübel; Mathias Hindborg; Emilie Lindkvist; Annie M Kastrup; Zeynep Yilmaz; René K Støving; Cynthia M Bulik; Jan M Sjögren Journal: Int J Eat Disord Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 4.861
Authors: Beatriz Elina Martínez-Carrillo; Talia Mondragón-Velásquez; Ninfa Ramírez-Durán; José Félix Aguirre-Garrido; Roxana Valdés-Ramos; Ana Laura Guadarrama-López; Arturo Castillo-Cardiel Journal: Int J Food Sci Date: 2022-01-07
Authors: Maria Seidel; Stefan Ehrlich; Lauren Breithaupt; Elisabeth Welch; Camilla Wiklund; Christopher Hübel; Laura M Thornton; Androula Savva; Bengt T Fundin; Jessica Pege; Annelie Billger; Afrouz Abbaspour; Martin Schaefer; Ilka Boehm; Johan Zvrskovec; Emilie Vangsgaard Rosager; Katharina Collin Hasselbalch; Virpi Leppä; Magnus Sjögren; Ricard Nergårdh; Jamie D Feusner; Ata Ghaderi; Cynthia M Bulik Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2020-10-14 Impact factor: 3.630