Literature DB >> 29538760

Spindle abnormalities and chromosome misalignment in bovine oocytes after exposure to low doses of bisphenol A or bisphenol S.

Kelly A Campen1,2, Katherine M Kucharczyk1, Benjamin Bogin1, Julie M Ehrlich1, Catherine M H Combelles1.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: What are the effects of exposure to bisphenol A (BPA) or bisphenol S (BPS) during IVM on bovine oocyte maturation, spindle morphology and chromosome alignment? SUMMARY ANSWER: Exposure to BPA or BPS during IVM resulted in increased spindle abnormalities and chromosome misalignment, even at very low concentrations. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: BPA is an endocrine disrupting chemical that alters oocyte maturation, spindle morphology and chromosome alignment in a range of species. The use of BPA substitutes, such as BPS, is increasing and these substitutes often display different potencies and mechanisms of action compared with BPA. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: Bovine cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) underwent IVM with BPA or BPS for 24 h, together with vehicle-only controls. Overall, 10 different concentrations of BPA or BPS were used ranging from 1 fM to 50 μM in order to detect low dose or non-monotonic effects. An incomplete block design was utilized for the study, with at least three replicates per block. A total of 939 oocytes (250 of which were controls) were used for the BPA experiments, and 432 (110 controls) for the BPS experiments. Following the IVM period, the oocytes were denuded and fixed for immunocytochemistry. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Immunocytochemistry was used to label the chromatin, actin, and microtubules in the fixed oocytes. The meiotic stage was assessed using immunofluorescence, and the metaphase-II (MII) oocytes were further assessed for spindle morphology and chromosome alignment (in all MII oocytes regardless of spindle morphology) using immunofluorescence and confocal microscopy. Significant differences between the treatment and control groups were determined using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: There was no effect of BPA or BPS on the proportion of bovine oocytes that reached MII (P > 0.05). BPA and BPS increased spindle abnormalities in MII oocytes at almost all concentrations tested, including those as low as 1 fM (P = 0.013) or 10 fM (P < 0.0001), respectively, compared to control. Oocytes with flattened spindles with broad poles were observed at a higher frequency at some concentrations of BPA (P = 0.0002 and P = 0.002 for 10 nM and 50 μM, respectively) or BPS (P = 0.01 for 100 nM BPS), while this spindle phenotype was absent in the controls. BPA increased chromosome misalignment at concentrations of 10 fM, 10 nM and 50 μM (P < 0.0001 to P = 0.043 depending on the dose). BPS increased chromosome misalignment at concentrations of 10 fM, 100 pM, 10 nM, 100 nM and 50 μM (P < 0.0001 to P = 0.013 depending on the dose). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION: Exposures to BPA or BPS were performed during the IVM of COCs to allow for determination of direct effects of these chemicals on oocyte maturation. Whole follicle culture or in vivo studies will confirm whether follicular cell interactions modify the effects of BPA or BPS on oocyte meiotic maturation. Investigation into the effects of BPA or BPS on other oocyte functions will determine whether these chemicals alter oocyte quality via mechanisms independent of the meiotic endpoints characterized here. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: The findings of this study show that both BPA and BPS induce spindle abnormalities and chromosome misalignment in bovine in a non-monotonic manner, and at concentrations that are orders of magnitude below those measured in humans. Taken in context with previous studies on the effects of BPA in a range of species, our data support the literature that BPA may reduce oocyte quality and lead to subsequent infertility. Additionally, these results contribute to the burgeoning field of research on BPS and suggest that BPS may indeed be a 'regrettable substitution' for BPA. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): This study was supported by funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (Grant 1R15ES024520-01). The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29538760      PMCID: PMC5925783          DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dey050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  65 in total

Review 1.  Bisphenol A and human health: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Johanna R Rochester
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 3.143

2.  Bisphenol A exposure reduces the estradiol response to gonadotropin stimulation during in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Michael S Bloom; Dongsul Kim; Frederick S Vom Saal; Julia A Taylor; Gloria Cheng; Julie D Lamb; Victor Y Fujimoto
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Effects of environmental pollutants on the reproduction and welfare of ruminants.

Authors:  S M Rhind; N P Evans; M Bellingham; R M Sharpe; C Cotinot; B Mandon-Pepin; B Loup; K D Sinclair; R G Lea; P Pocar; B Fischer; E van der Zalm; K Hart; J-S Schmidt; M R Amezaga; P A Fowler
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2010-04-21       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Effects of bisphenol s exposure on endocrine functions and reproduction of zebrafish.

Authors:  Kyunghee Ji; Seongjin Hong; Younglim Kho; Kyungho Choi
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-11       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Bisphenol a exposure causes meiotic aneuploidy in the female mouse.

Authors:  Patricia A Hunt; Kara E Koehler; Martha Susiarjo; Craig A Hodges; Arlene Ilagan; Robert C Voigt; Sally Thomas; Brian F Thomas; Terry J Hassold
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2003-04-01       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Successful culture in vitro of sheep and cattle ova.

Authors:  H R Tervit; D G Whittingham; L E Rowson
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1972-09

7.  Serum unconjugated bisphenol A concentrations in women may adversely influence oocyte quality during in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  Victor Y Fujimoto; Dongsul Kim; Frederick S vom Saal; Julie D Lamb; Julia A Taylor; Michael S Bloom
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 7.329

8.  Bisphenol-A and human oocyte maturation in vitro.

Authors:  Ronit Machtinger; Catherine M H Combelles; Stacey A Missmer; Katharine F Correia; Paige Williams; Russ Hauser; Catherine Racowsky
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2013-07-30       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 9.  Human exposure to bisphenol A (BPA).

Authors:  Laura N Vandenberg; Russ Hauser; Michele Marcus; Nicolas Olea; Wade V Welshons
Journal:  Reprod Toxicol       Date:  2007-07-31       Impact factor: 3.143

Review 10.  Bisphenol S and F: A Systematic Review and Comparison of the Hormonal Activity of Bisphenol A Substitutes.

Authors:  Johanna R Rochester; Ashley L Bolden
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  9 in total

1.  Maternal and paternal preconception exposure to bisphenols and size at birth.

Authors:  Vicente Mustieles; Paige L Williams; Mariana F Fernandez; Lidia Mínguez-Alarcón; Jennifer B Ford; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Carmen Messerlian
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2018-08-01       Impact factor: 6.918

2.  Mechanisms underlying disruption of oocyte spindle stability by bisphenol compounds.

Authors:  Luhan Yang; Claudia Baumann; Rabindranth De La Fuente; Maria M Viveiros
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Maternal and paternal preconception exposure to phenols and preterm birth.

Authors:  Vicente Mustieles; Yu Zhang; Jennifer Yland; Joseph M Braun; Paige L Williams; Blair J Wylie; Jill A Attaman; Jennifer B Ford; Alexandra Azevedo; Antonia M Calafat; Russ Hauser; Carmen Messerlian
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2020-02-29       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 4.  Aneuploidy in mammalian oocytes and the impact of maternal ageing.

Authors:  Chloe Charalambous; Alexandre Webster; Melina Schuh
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2022-09-06       Impact factor: 113.915

5.  Proposed Key Characteristics of Female Reproductive Toxicants as an Approach for Organizing and Evaluating Mechanistic Data in Hazard Assessment.

Authors:  Ulrike Luderer; Brenda Eskenazi; Russ Hauser; Kenneth S Korach; Cliona M McHale; Francisco Moran; Linda Rieswijk; Gina Solomon; Osamu Udagawa; Luoping Zhang; Marya Zlatnik; Lauren Zeise; Martyn T Smith
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 9.031

6.  Bisphenol S Impaired In Vitro Ovine Early Developmental Oocyte Competence.

Authors:  Alice Desmarchais; Ophélie Téteau; Pascal Papillier; Manon Jaubert; Xavier Druart; Aurélien Binet; Virginie Maillard; Sebastien Elis
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Bisphenol S is present in culture media used for ART and cell culture.

Authors:  A Togola; A Desmarchais; O Téteau; C Vignault; V Maillard; C Buron; S Bristeau; F Guérif; A Binet; S Elis
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 8.  Nonpersistent endocrine disrupting chemicals and reproductive health of women.

Authors:  Yeon Jean Cho; Jeong Hye Yun; Su Jin Kim; Hyun Young Kwon
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol Sci       Date:  2019-12-26

Review 9.  Bisphenol S in Food Causes Hormonal and Obesogenic Effects Comparable to or Worse than Bisphenol A: A Literature Review.

Authors:  Michael Thoene; Ewa Dzika; Slawomir Gonkowski; Joanna Wojtkiewicz
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 5.717

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.