Literature DB >> 29538696

Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain Reduces Opioid Use and Results in Superior Clinical Outcomes When Used Without Opioids.

Lucy Gee1, Heather C Smith2, Zohal Ghulam-Jelani1,2, Hirah Khan2, Julia Prusik1,2, Paul J Feustel1, Sarah E McCallum1, Julie G Pilitsis1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain causes a significant burden to the US health care system, is difficult to treat, and remains a significant contributor to increased opioid use in the United States. Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has been FDA approved for the treatment of chronic pain.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the hypothesis that SCS reduces opioid use, and alone maintains clinical outcome measures of pain and psychosocial determinants of health.
METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we evaluated 86 patients undergoing SCS surgery for the treatment of chronic pain between September 2012 and August 2015. Preoperatively and postoperatively, patients completed the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Beck's Depression Inventory (BDI). VAS scores were retrospectively analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifty-three patients used opioids before SCS implantation. The 33 nonusers had lower mean VAS, NRS, and ODI scores than both opioid groups at 1 yr and improved significantly at 1 yr on the VAS (P < .001), NRS (P < .001), MPQ (P = .002), PCS (P < .001), BDI (P = .04), and ODI (P = .002). After surgery, 41.5% remained opioids and 58.5% reduced/eliminated use. Discontinued (n = 29) or reduced (n = 2) use resulted in VAS, NRS, total MPQ, and ODI score reduction (P < .001, P = .002, P = .002, and P = .009 respectively). At 1 yr, survey scores in opioid users were unchanged. There was no difference between groups in revision or failure rates.
CONCLUSION: Sixty-four percent of patients who were using opioids prior to SCS reduced (n = 2) or eliminated opioid use (n = 29) at 1 yr postoperatively. Patients who eliminated opioid use or never used opioids had superior clinical outcomes to those who continued use.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 29538696     DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy065

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  10 in total

1.  A case series of new radicular pain following the insertion of spinal cord stimulator.

Authors:  Ganesan Baranidharan; Beatrice Bretherton; Sheila Black
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2022-04-18

2.  Decreased Opioid Consumption and Durable Pain Relief in Patients Treated with 10 kHz SCS: A Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes from Single-Center.

Authors:  Honghui Feng; Patrick Doherty; Anand Rotte
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2021-08-24       Impact factor: 2.832

3.  Treatment Strategies for Generator Pocket Pain.

Authors:  Jonathan Bao; Olga Khazen; Zachary T Olmsted; Guy Gechtman; Miriam M Shao; Marisa DiMarzio; Gregory Topp; Vishad V Sukul; Michael D Staudt; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Pain Med       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 4.  Opioid-sparing effects of 10 kHz spinal cord stimulation: a review of clinical evidence.

Authors:  Adnan Al-Kaisy; Jean-Pierre Van Buyten; Kasra Amirdelfan; Bradford Gliner; David Caraway; Jeyakumar Subbaroyan; Anand Rotte; Leonardo Kapural
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Efficacy of interventions to reduce long term opioid treatment for chronic non-cancer pain: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Nicholas Avery; Amy G McNeilage; Fiona Stanaway; Claire E Ashton-James; Fiona M Blyth; Rebecca Martin; Ali Gholamrezaei; Paul Glare
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2022-04-04

Review 6.  Spinal Cord Stimulation as Treatment for Cancer and Chemotherapy-Induced Pain.

Authors:  Breanna L Sheldon; Jonathan Bao; Olga Khazen; Julie G Pilitsis
Journal:  Front Pain Res (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-08-24

7.  Clinical Outcomes after Spinal Cord Stimulation According to Pain Characteristics.

Authors:  Jong-Ho Ha; Ryoong Huh; Shin-Gyeom Kim; Soo-Bin Im; Je Hoon Jeong; Sun-Chul Hwang; Dong-Seong Shin; Bum-Tae Kim; Moonyoung Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2022-01-04

8.  Long-Term Efficacy of a Novel Spinal Cord Stimulation Clinical Workflow Using Kilohertz Stimulation: Twelve-Month Results From the Vectors Study.

Authors:  John A Hatheway; Vipul Mangal; Michael A Fishman; Philip Kim; Binit Shah; Rainer Vogel; Vincent Galan; Steven Severyn; Tristan E Weaver; David A Provenzano; Eric Chang; Michael H Verdolin; Gregory Howes; Armando Villarreal; Steven Falowski; Kelly Hendrickson; Katherine Stromberg; Lachlan Davies; Lisa Johanek; Matthew T Kelly
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-12-09

9.  The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on patients awaiting spinal cord stimulation surgery in the United Kingdom: a multi-centre patient survey.

Authors:  Ganesan Baranidharan; Beatrice Bretherton; Sam Eldabe; Vivek Mehta; Simon Thomson; Manohar Lal Sharma; Girish Vajramani; Stana Bojanic; Ashish Gulve; James FitzGerald; Samuel Hall; Julie Firth
Journal:  Br J Pain       Date:  2020-08-21

10.  Higher Preimplantation Opioid Doses Associated With Long-Term Spinal Cord Stimulation Failure in 211 Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome.

Authors:  Mette Nissen; Tiina-Mari Ikäheimo; Jukka Huttunen; Ville Leinonen; Henna-Kaisa Jyrkkänen; Mikael von Und Zu Fraunberg
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2020-10-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.