Literature DB >> 36032340

A case series of new radicular pain following the insertion of spinal cord stimulator.

Ganesan Baranidharan1,2, Beatrice Bretherton1,3, Sheila Black1.   

Abstract

Purpose: Although spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a safe procedure, equipment-related, biological and neurological complications have been observed in previous research, particularly case reports. No reports of new neuropathic pain in the absence of neurological deficit or positive MRI findings have been described. We detail three cases of new-onset radicular pain in the L5/S1 dermatome following insertion of SCS.
Methods: This was a retrospective case series of three patients. Details of clinical background, indications for SCS and events occurring during insertion and further management were recorded.
Results: All three cases were technically difficult and required multiple epidural entry levels, with repeated passage of the electrode into and within the epidural space. All cases involved accessing epidural space T12/L1 and L1/L2. A possible explanation for the new-onset radicular pain could concern oedema to the conus medullaris, resulting from repeated passage of the electrode at the T12/L1 level. Alternative explanations could be direct trauma to transiting nerve roots, neuroplastic changes resulting in peripheral and central sensitisation and immune-mediated nerve injury.
Conclusion: MRI imaging should be analysed prior to the SCS procedure to identify the level of the conus medullaris, with the aim of avoiding repeated passage of electrodes at that level. Unintended neurological adverse events should be discussed with patients during the consent process. Careful patient selection and psychological screening may also help identify patients who may be unlikely to respond to SCS therapy. Further reporting of new radiculopathic pain following SCS insertion is required to strengthen understanding of its potential causes.
© The Author(s) 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Spinal cord stimulation; complication; conus medullaris; radiculopathy; retrospective

Year:  2022        PMID: 36032340      PMCID: PMC9411753          DOI: 10.1177/20494637221084187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Pain        ISSN: 2049-4637


  60 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation: a possible therapeutic alternative for chronic mesenteric ischaemia.

Authors:  A Ceballos; L Cabezudo; M Bovaira; P Fenollosa; B Moro
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 6.961

2.  A report of paraparesis following spinal cord stimulator trial, implantation and revision.

Authors:  Clark C Smith; John L Lin; Max Shokat; Sonny S Dosanjh; Dionne Casthely
Journal:  Pain Physician       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.965

3.  A 2-center comparative study on tonic versus burst spinal cord stimulation: amount of responders and amount of pain suppression.

Authors:  Dirk De Ridder; Mathieu W P M Lenders; Cecile C De Vos; Cindy Dijkstra-Scholten; Rian Wolters; Tim Vancamp; Pieter Van Looy; Tony Van Havenbergh; Sven Vanneste
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.442

Review 4.  The effectiveness and risks of long-term opioid therapy for chronic pain: a systematic review for a National Institutes of Health Pathways to Prevention Workshop.

Authors:  Roger Chou; Judith A Turner; Emily B Devine; Ryan N Hansen; Sean D Sullivan; Ian Blazina; Tracy Dana; Christina Bougatsos; Richard A Deyo
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 25.391

5.  Pathophysiological characterisation of back pain generators in failed back surgery syndrome (part B).

Authors:  P Rigoard; S Blond; R David; P Mertens
Journal:  Neurochirurgie       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 1.553

6.  Spontaneous conus medullaris infarction in a 79 year-old female with cardiovascular risk factors: a case report.

Authors:  Jessica J Wong; John Dufton; Silvano A Mior
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2012-03

7.  Preferred frequencies and waveforms for spinal cord stimulation in patients with complex regional pain syndrome: A multicentre, double-blind, randomized and placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  N Kriek; J G Groeneweg; D L Stronks; D de Ridder; F J P M Huygen
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2016-10-07       Impact factor: 3.931

Review 8.  Spinal cord stimulation for patients with failed back surgery syndrome or complex regional pain syndrome: a systematic review of effectiveness and complications.

Authors:  Judith A Turner; John D Loeser; Richard A Deyo; Stacy B Sanders
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.961

9.  10 kHz High-Frequency Spinal Cord Stimulation for Chronic Axial Low Back Pain in Patients With No History of Spinal Surgery: A Preliminary, Prospective, Open Label and Proof-of-Concept Study.

Authors:  Adnan Al-Kaisy; Stefano Palmisani; Thomas E Smith; David Pang; Khai Lam; William Burgoyne; Russell Houghton; Emma Hudson; Jonathan Lucas
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2016-12-26

10.  Spinal cord stimulation for visceral pain--a novel approach.

Authors:  Ganesan Baranidharan; Karen H Simpson; Karthikeyan Dhandapani
Journal:  Neuromodulation       Date:  2014-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.