Literature DB >> 29537695

Effect of cell phone radiofrequency radiation on body temperature in rodents: Pilot studies of the National Toxicology Program's reverberation chamber exposure system.

Michael E Wyde1, Thomas L Horn2, Myles H Capstick3, John M Ladbury4, Galen Koepke4, Perry F Wilson4, Grace E Kissling1, Matthew D Stout1, Niels Kuster3, Ronald L Melnick1, James Gauger2, John R Bucher1, David L McCormick2.   

Abstract

Radiofrequency radiation (RFR) causes heating, which can lead to detrimental biological effects. To characterize the effects of RFR exposure on body temperature in relation to animal size and pregnancy, a series of short-term toxicity studies was conducted in a unique RFR exposure system. Young and old B6C3F1 mice and young, old, and pregnant Harlan Sprague-Dawley rats were exposed to Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM) or Code Division Multiple Access (CDMA) RFR (rats = 900 MHz, mice = 1,900 MHz) at specific absorption rates (SARs) up to 12 W/kg for approximately 9 h a day for 5 days. In general, fewer and less severe increases in body temperature were observed in young than in older rats. SAR-dependent increases in subcutaneous body temperatures were observed at exposures ≥6 W/kg in both modulations. Exposures of  ≥10 W/kg GSM or CDMA RFR induced excessive increases in body temperature, leading to mortality. There was also a significant increase in the number of resorptions in pregnant rats at 12 W/kg GSM RFR. In mice, only sporadic increases in body temperature were observed regardless of sex or age when exposed to GSM or CDMA RFR up to 12 W/kg. These results identified SARs at which measurable RFR-mediated thermal effects occur, and were used in the selection of exposures for subsequent toxicology and carcinogenicity studies. Bioelectromagnetics. 39:190-199, 2018.
© 2018 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2018 The Authors. Bioelectromagnetics Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  body temperature; microwaves; pregnancy; rodents; wireless communication

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29537695     DOI: 10.1002/bem.22116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics        ISSN: 0197-8462            Impact factor:   2.010


  8 in total

1.  Genetic susceptibility may modify the association between cell phone use and thyroid cancer: A population-based case-control study in Connecticut.

Authors:  Jiajun Luo; Hang Li; Nicole C Deziel; Huang Huang; Nan Zhao; Shuangge Ma; Xin Ni; Robert Udelsman; Yawei Zhang
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  The Effect of Radiation Emitted by Cell Phone on The Gelatinolytic Activity of Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and -9 of Mouse Pre-Antral Follicles during In Vitro Culture.

Authors:  Fariba Azimipour; Saeed Zavareh; Taghi Lashkarbolouki
Journal:  Cell J       Date:  2019-09-08       Impact factor: 2.479

3.  Significant Cellular Viability Dependence on Time Exposition at ELF-EMF and RF-EMF In Vitro Studies.

Authors:  Olga García-Minguillán López; Ana Jiménez Valbuena; Ceferino Maestú Unturbe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Evaluation of the genotoxicity of cell phone radiofrequency radiation in male and female rats and mice following subchronic exposure.

Authors:  Stephanie L Smith-Roe; Michael E Wyde; Matthew D Stout; John W Winters; Cheryl A Hobbs; Kim G Shepard; Amanda S Green; Grace E Kissling; Keith R Shockley; Raymond R Tice; John R Bucher; Kristine L Witt
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2019-11-13       Impact factor: 3.216

Review 5.  Onco-Esthetics Dilemma: Is There a Role for Electrocosmetic-Medical Devices?

Authors:  Beniamino Palmieri; Lucia Palmieri; Andrea Mambrini; Valentina Pepe; Maria Vadalà
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  An International Collaborative Animal Study of the Carcinogenicity of Mobile Phone Radiofrequency Radiation: Considerations for Preparation of a Global Project.

Authors:  Young Hwan Ahn; Katsumi Imaida; Yong-Bum Kim; Kang-Hyun Han; Jeong-Ki Pack; Nam Kim; Sang Bong Jeon; Ae-Kyoung Lee; Hyung Do Choi; Jianqing Wang; Mayumi Kawabe; Hye Sun Kim
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2022-04-27       Impact factor: 1.848

7.  Scientific evidence invalidates health assumptions underlying the FCC and ICNIRP exposure limit determinations for radiofrequency radiation: implications for 5G.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2022-10-18       Impact factor: 7.123

8.  Thermoregulatory Stress as Potential Mediating Factor in the NTP Cell Phone Tumor Study.

Authors:  Jens Kuhne; Janine-Alison Schmidt; Dirk Geschwentner; Blanka Pophof; Gunde Ziegelberger
Journal:  Bioelectromagnetics       Date:  2020-07-21       Impact factor: 2.010

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.