Literature DB >> 29536211

Why Drugs Fail in Late Stages of Development: Case Study Analyses from the Last Decade and Recommendations.

Dolly A Parasrampuria1, Leslie Z Benet2, Amarnath Sharma3.   

Abstract

New drug development is both resource and time intensive, where later clinical stages result in significant costs. We analyze recent late-stage failures to identify drugs where failures result from inadequate scientific advances as well as drugs where we believe pitfalls could have been avoided. These can be broadly classified into two categories: 1) where science is mature and the failures can be avoided through rigorous and prospectively determined decision-making criteria, scientific curiosity, and discipline to follow up on emerging findings; and 2) where problems encountered in Phase 3 failures cannot be explained at this time, as the science is not sufficiently advanced and companies/investigators need to recognize the possibility of deficiency of our knowledge. Through these case studies, key themes critical for successful drug development emerge-understanding the therapeutic pathway including receptor and signaling biology, pharmacological responses related to safety and efficacy, pharmacokinetics of the drug and exposure at target site, optimum dose, and dosing regimen; and identification of patient sub-populations likely to respond and will have a favorable benefit-risk profile, design of clinical trials, and a quantitative framework that can guide data-driven decision making. It is essential that the right studies are conducted early in the development process to answer the key questions, with the emphasis on learning in the early stages of development, whereas Phase 3 should be reserved for confirming the safety and efficacy. Utilization of innovative technology in identifying patients based on molecular signature of their disease, rapid assessment of pharmacological response, mechanistic modeling of emerging data, seamless operational processes to reduce start-up and wind-down time for clinical trials through use of electronic health records and data mining, and development of novel and objective clinical efficacy endpoints are some concepts for improving the success rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biomarker; clinical trial; drug development; efficacy; pharmacokinetics; safety

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29536211     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-018-0204-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  79 in total

1.  Evaluation of DILI Predictive Hypotheses in Early Drug Development.

Authors:  Rosa Chan; Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 3.739

2.  Bapineuzumab, an investigational agent for Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Farah Khorassani; Olga Hilas
Journal:  P T       Date:  2013-02

3.  Systems pharmacology for drug discovery and development: paradigm shift or flash in the pan?

Authors:  P Vicini; P H van der Graaf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 4.  Lost in translation: animal models and clinical trials in cancer treatment.

Authors:  Isabella Wy Mak; Nathan Evaniew; Michelle Ghert
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2014-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 5.  Emerging applications of metabolomics in drug discovery and precision medicine.

Authors:  David S Wishart
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 6.  The role of BCS (biopharmaceutics classification system) and BDDCS (biopharmaceutics drug disposition classification system) in drug development.

Authors:  Leslie Z Benet
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.534

7.  Integrating indacaterol dose selection in a clinical study in COPD using an adaptive seamless design.

Authors:  Peter J Barnes; Stuart J Pocock; Helgo Magnussen; Amir Iqbal; Benjamin Kramer; Mark Higgins; David Lawrence
Journal:  Pulm Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 3.410

8.  Can animal models of disease reliably inform human studies?

Authors:  H Bart van der Worp; David W Howells; Emily S Sena; Michelle J Porritt; Sarah Rewell; Victoria O'Collins; Malcolm R Macleod
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Limitations of model based dose selection for indacaterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Yaning Wang; Joo Yeon Lee; Theresa Michele; Badrul A Chowdhury; Jogarao V Gobburu
Journal:  Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.366

Review 10.  Cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors for dyslipidemia: focus on dalcetrapib.

Authors:  Alyse S Goldberg; Robert A Hegele
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2012-09-24       Impact factor: 4.162

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for Early Prediction and Timely Recognition of Drug-Induced Liver Injury: The Case of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors.

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 5.810

2.  Functional Drug Screening using Kidney Cells On-A-Chip: Advances in Disease Modeling and Development of Biomarkers.

Authors:  Amrendra K Ajay
Journal:  Kidney360       Date:  2022-02-24

3.  HepaRG cells adopt zonal-like drug-metabolizing phenotypes under physiologically relevant oxygen tensions and Wnt/β-catenin signaling.

Authors:  Thomas J DiProspero; Lauren G Brown; Trevor D Fachko; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 3.579

4.  Leveraging Human Genetics to Identify Safety Signals Prior to Drug Marketing Approval and Clinical Use.

Authors:  Rebecca N Jerome; Meghan Morrison Joly; Nan Kennedy; Jana K Shirey-Rice; Dan M Roden; Gordon R Bernard; Kenneth J Holroyd; Joshua C Denny; Jill M Pulley
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Leveraging gene expression subgroups to classify DLBCL patients and select for clinical benefit from a novel agent.

Authors:  Alberto Risueño; Patrick R Hagner; Fadi Towfic; Celia Fontanillo; Amira Djebbari; Joel S Parker; Clifton P Drew; Grzegorz S Nowakowski; Matthew J Maurer; James R Cerhan; Xin Wei; Yan Ren; Chung-Wein Lee; Suzana Couto; Maria Wang; Michael Pourdehnad; Anita K Gandhi; Matthew W B Trotter
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 6.  Modeling epileptic spasms during infancy: Are we heading for the treatment yet?

Authors:  Libor Velíšek; Jana Velíšková
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 12.310

7.  Physiologically relevant oxygen tensions differentially regulate hepatotoxic responses in HepG2 cells.

Authors:  Thomas J DiProspero; Erin Dalrymple; Matthew R Lockett
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.685

Review 8.  Human biomimetic liver microphysiology systems in drug development and precision medicine.

Authors:  Albert Gough; Alejandro Soto-Gutierrez; Lawrence Vernetti; Mo R Ebrahimkhani; Andrew M Stern; D Lansing Taylor
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 73.082

9.  An ensemble learning approach for modeling the systems biology of drug-induced injury.

Authors:  Joaquim Aguirre-Plans; Janet Piñero; Terezinha Souza; Giulia Callegaro; Steven J Kunnen; Ferran Sanz; Narcis Fernandez-Fuentes; Laura I Furlong; Emre Guney; Baldo Oliva
Journal:  Biol Direct       Date:  2021-01-12       Impact factor: 4.540

10.  [Establishment of a rapid identification of adverse drug reaction program in R language implementation based on monitoring data].

Authors:  Dongsheng Hong; Jian Ni; Wenya Shan; Lu Li; Xi Hu; Hongyu Yang; Qingwei Zhao; Xingguo Zhang
Journal:  Zhejiang Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.