| Literature DB >> 29535672 |
Xin Huang1,2, Yingkai Li1, Huiyu Feng1, Pei Chen1, Weibin Liu1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical profile, clinical outcomes and factors that may affect the outcome of juvenile myasthenia gravis (JMG) patients in southern China.Entities:
Keywords: clinical characteristics; juvenile myasthenia gravis; outcomes; southern China; treatment
Year: 2018 PMID: 29535672 PMCID: PMC5835068 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.003
Clinical characteristics of the 327 juvenile myasthenia gravis patients involved in this study.
| Age at onset | Patients | Proportion (%) | Male | Proportion (%) | Female | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| <1 year | 9 | 2.8 | 5 | 55.6 | 4 | 44.4 |
| 1–3 years | 79 | 24.2 | 32 | 40.5 | 47 | 59.5 |
| 3–6 years | 82 | 25.1 | 42 | 51.2 | 40 | 48.8 |
| 6–12 years | 83 | 25.4 | 47 | 56.6 | 36 | 43.4 |
| 12–18 years | 74 | 22.6 | 37 | 50.0 | 37 | 50.0 |
| Total | 327 | 100 | 163 | 49.8 | 164 | 50.2 |
| Duration at first visit, months | 44.9 ± 3.6 (0.1–360) | |||||
Symptoms at onset.
| Symptoms at onset | Patients | Proportion (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Ptosis | 238 | 72.8 |
| Diplopia | 16 | 4.9 |
| Strabismus | 7 | 2.1 |
| Ptosis and diplopia | 38 | 11.6 |
| Ptosis and strabismus | 7 | 2.1 |
| Limb weakness | 3 | 0.9 |
| Dysphagia | 1 | 0.3 |
| Dysarthria | 1 | 0.3 |
| Respiratory muscle weakness | 2 | 0.6 |
| Ocular and limb weakness | 7 | 2.1 |
| Ocular and bulbar weakness | 3 | 0.9 |
| Ocular, limb and bulbar weakness | 4 | 1.2 |
Figure 1Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification and gender. In total, 327 patients with acquired myasthenia were classified according to the MGFA classification at maximum severity. Our data indicated that there were subgroups of MG patients that shared distinct clinical features or disease severity; most patients were MGFA class 1. The group distribution of MGFA classification was significantly different (Fisher’s exact test, P = 0.038) when compared between males and females.
Figure 2Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) clinical classification across all age groups. Patients within different age groups had significantly different MGFA classifications (χ2 test, P = 0.004); there were more patients diagnosed as MGFA class 1 in the patient group which was <3 years of age. The proportion of MGFA class I patients decreased with age, while the proportion of MGFA class II patients increased with age.
Figure 3Distribution of AChR antibody titer across different Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classifications. Significant differences existed in AChR antibody titer when compared across MGFA classification groups (Kruskal–Wallis test, P = 0.002). AChR antibody titer was lowest in the ocular patients and highest in the MGFA class 5 patients.
Treatments in juvenile myasthenia gravis patients according to Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) classification.
| Treatment | MGFA I | MGFA II | MGFA III | MGFA IV | MGFA V |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pyridostigmine only | 19(7.7%) | 1(2.0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) | 0(0%) |
| Pyridostigmine + Prednisone | 109(44.3%) | 13(26.5%) | 5(27.8%) | 0(0%) | 4(44.4%) |
| Pyridostigmine + Immunosuppressants/Pyridostigmine + Prednisone + Immunosuppressants | 117(47.6%) | 35(71.4%) | 13(72.2%) | 5(100%) | 5(55.6%) |
| Thymectomy | 158(64.2%) | 43(87.8%) | 14(77.8%) | 5(100%) | 6(66.7%) |