Literature DB >> 29534170

Incidence of new-onset left bundle branch block and predictors of new permanent pacemaker following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with the Portico™ valve.

Thomas Walther1, Ganesh Manoharan2, Axel Linke3, Helge Möllmann4, David Holzhey5, Stephen G Worthley6, Won-Keun Kim7, Ulrich Schäfer8.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the incidence and timing of new-onset left bundle branch block (LBBB) and new permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the repositionable, self-expanding Portico™ TAVI system (St. Jude Medical, St Paul, MN, USA). Clinical impact and periprocedural factors associated with new PPI were also assessed.
METHODS: A total of 198 high-risk patients without pre-existing pacemaker [83.1 ± 4.7 years, 77.3% women, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) 5.8%] from the Pre-CE Mark Portico TAVI system study were prospectively analysed. Twelve-lead electrocardiographic and echocardiographic data were collected prior to, during and after the procedure. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1 year.
RESULTS: Transfemoral implantation of the Portico valve was associated with a new PPI rate of 15.2% at 30 days and 16.7% at 1 year. Overall, 53 of the 187 patients without pre-existing LBBB developed new-onset LBBB at 1 year (28.3%); 23 occurred during the procedure. At 30 days, new-onset LBBB spontaneously resolved in 61.0% of patients. New-onset LBBB post-TAVI was not associated with new PPI (P = 0.64); 8 of the 53 patients required new PPI. Multivariable regression analyses revealed pre-existing right bundle branch block (P = 0.004) and aortic annulus diameter (P = 0.001) as independent predictors of new PPI. New PPI at discharge (n = 29) was not associated with increased freedom from all-cause (odds ratio 92.7%, 95% confidence interval 73.7-98.1%; P = 0.49) and cardiovascular (odds ratio 96.6%, 95% confidence interval 77.9-99.5%; P = 0.47) mortality at 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: The Portico TAVI system demonstrated an acceptable rate of new PPI at 1 year without increased mortality risk to patients. New-onset LBBB was common during the procedure, with the majority of events spontaneously resolving by 30 days. No intraprocedural factors were shown to independently predict new PPI. Clinical trial registration number: NCT01493284.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29534170     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezy078

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  9 in total

1.  Mid- to Long-Term Clinical and Echocardiographic Effects of Post-procedural Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shun Xu; Enrui Zhang; Zhiyong Qian; Jinyu Sun; Fengwei Zou; Yao Wang; Xiaofeng Hou; Jiangang Zou
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-06-28

2.  Impact of postprocedural permanent pacemaker implantation on clinical outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ziwei Xi; Tong Liu; Jing Liang; Yu-Jie Zhou; Wei Liu
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Overcoming the transcatheter aortic valve replacement Achilles heel: conduction abnormalities-a systematic review.

Authors:  Alberto Alperi; Guillem Muntané-Carol; Afonso B Freitas-Ferraz; Lucia Junquera; David Del Val; Laurent Faroux; François Philippon; Josep Rodés-Cabau
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2020-11

Review 4.  Intraventricular Conduction Disturbances After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Shu-I Lin; Mizuki Miura; Ana Paula Tagliari; Ying-Hsian Lee; Shinichi Shirai; Rishi Puri; Francesco Maisano; Maurizio Taramasso
Journal:  Interv Cardiol       Date:  2020-07-29

Review 5.  Rate and Predictors of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Current Status.

Authors:  Eleonora Russo; Domenico R Potenza; Michela Casella; Raimondo Massaro; Giulio Russo; Maurizio Braccio; Antonio Dello Russo; Mauro Cassese
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2019

6.  Structural Changesofthe Right Fibrous Trigone as a Risk Factor for Conduction Disturbance After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

Authors:  Serkan Aslan; Aysel Türkvatan; Çağdaş Topel; Ahmet Güner; Ali Rıza Demir; Serkan Kahraman; Ömer Çelik; Mehmet Ertürk
Journal:  Anatol J Cardiol       Date:  2022-07       Impact factor: 1.475

7.  Predicting permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A contemporary meta-analysis of 981,168 patients.

Authors:  Anan A Abu Rmilah; Hossam Al-Zu'bi; Ikram-Ul Haq; Asil H Yagmour; Suhaib A Jaber; Adham K Alkurashi; Ibraheem Qaisi; Gurukripa N Kowlgi; Yong-Mei Cha; Siva Mulpuru; Christopher V DeSimone; Abhishek J Deshmukh
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2022-05-12

8.  Long-term clinical impact of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Andrea Zito; Giuseppe Princi; Marco Lombardi; Domenico D'Amario; Rocco Vergallo; Cristina Aurigemma; Enrico Romagnoli; Gemma Pelargonio; Piergiorgio Bruno; Carlo Trani; Francesco Burzotta; Filippo Crea
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.486

9.  Procedural Safety and Device Performance of the Portico™ Valve from Experienced TAVI Centers: 30-Day Outcomes in the Multicenter CONFIDENCE Registry.

Authors:  Helge Mollmann; Axel Linke; Luis Nombela-Franco; Martin Sluka; Juan Francisco Oteo Dominguez; Matteo Montorfano; Won-Keun Kim; Martin Arnold; Mariuca Vasa-Nicotera; Lenard Conradi; Anthony Camuglia; Francesco Bedogni; Ganesh Manoharan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.964

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.