Literature DB >> 29533729

Five-Year Survival of Short Single-Tooth Implants (6 mm): A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

N Naenni1, P Sahrmann2, P R Schmidlin2, T Attin2, D B Wiedemeier3, V Sapata1, C H F Hämmerle1, R E Jung1.   

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether 6-mm dental implants in the posterior segments of either jaw perform equally well in terms of clinical and radiographic outcomes when compared with 10-mm implants after 5 y of loading. Patients with single-tooth gaps in the posterior area who were scheduled for implant therapy were randomly assigned to a group receiving either a 6- or 10-mm implant. After a healing period of 10 wk, implants were loaded with a screw-retained single crown and followed up at yearly intervals. Of 96 patients, 86 could be recalled after 5 y. The implant survival rates amounted to 91% (95% confidence interval: 0.836 to 0.998) for the 6-mm group and 100% for the 10-mm group ( P = 0.036). Median crown-to-implant (C/I) ratios were 1.75 (interquartile range [IQR], 1.50 to 1.90) for the 6-mm group and 1.04 (IQR, 0.95 to 1.15) for the 10-mm group, whereas the median marginal bone levels measured -0.29 mm (IQR, -0.92 to 0.23) for the 6-mm group and -0.15 mm (IQR: -0.93 - 0.41) for the 10-mm group after 5 y. The C/I ratio turned out to be statistically significant ( P < 0.001), whereas marginal bone levels showed no significant difference between the groups. The 6-mm implants exhibited significantly lower survival rates than the 10-mm implants over 5 y, whereas there was no difference between upper and lower jaws in terms of survival ( P = 0.58). Lost implants did not show any sign of marginal bone loss or peri-implant infection previous to loss of osseointegration. High C/I ratio and implant length had no significant effect on marginal bone level changes or technical and biological complications (German Clinical Trials Registry: DRKS00006290).

Entities:  

Keywords:  alveolar bone loss; bone and bones; clinical research; dental radiography; single tooth dental implants; treatment outcome

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29533729     DOI: 10.1177/0022034518758036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Res        ISSN: 0022-0345            Impact factor:   6.116


  15 in total

Review 1.  Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.

Authors:  Miaozhen Wang; Feng Liu; Christian Ulm; Huidan Shen; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.748

Review 2.  Short versus Longer Implants in Sites without the Need for Bone Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Luigi Guida; Eriberto Bressan; Gennaro Cecoro; Armando Davide Volpe; Massimo Del Fabbro; Marco Annunziata
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 3.748

3.  Influence of Implant Tilting and Length on the Biomechanics of Single-Tooth Restoration: A Finite Element Analysis in Atrophic Mandible.

Authors:  Eduardo Anitua; Naiara Larrazabal Saez de Ibarra; Iñigo Morales Martín; Luis Saracho Rotaeche
Journal:  Dent J (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-06

4.  Short Dental Implants (6 mm) Versus Standard Dental Implants (10 mm) Supporting Single Crowns in the Posterior Maxilla and/or Mandible: 2-Year Results from a Prospective Cohort Comparative Trial.

Authors:  Luigi Svezia; Filippo Casotto
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2018-09-30

5.  Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A five-year prospective case series.

Authors:  Felix L Guljé; Gerry M Raghoebar; Arjan Vissink; Henny J A Meijer
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2019-07-28       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  Survival Rate of 1008 Short Dental Implants with 21 Months of Average Follow-Up: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  João Caramês; Ana Catarina Pinto; Gonçalo Caramês; Helena Francisco; Joana Fialho; Duarte Marques
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.

Authors:  Xiaoran Yu; Ruogu Xu; Zhengchuan Zhang; Yang Yang; Feilong Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Immediately provisionalized tapered conical connection implants for single-tooth restorations in the maxillary esthetic zone: a 5-year prospective single-cohort multicenter analysis.

Authors:  Russell A Baer; Robert Nölken; Snjezana Colic; Guido Heydecke; Christine Mirzakhanian; Alexandra Behneke; Nikolaus Behneke; Edward Gottesman; Liliana Ottria; Alessandro Pozzi; Alexander Fügl; Werner Zechner
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-01-08       Impact factor: 3.573

9.  Comparison of 6-mm and 11-mm dental implants in the posterior region supporting fixed dental prostheses: 5-year results of an open multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Felix L Guljé; Henny J A Meijer; Ingemar Abrahamsson; Christopher A Barwacz; Stephen Chen; Paul J Palmer; Homayoun Zadeh; Clark M Stanford
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.977

Review 10.  Autologous Materials in Regenerative Dentistry: Harvested Bone, Platelet Concentrates and Dentin Derivates.

Authors:  Sara Bernardi; Guido Macchiarelli; Serena Bianchi
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-11-15       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.