| Literature DB >> 29531211 |
Peng Fu1, Lingge Wei1, Fang Zhang1, Jianqing Gao1, Jianmin Jing1, Weijie Wu1, Huaijun Liu2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the added value of NeuroGam software analysis in the localization diagnosis of epileptogenic zone during interictal phase of seizures. MATERIAL AND METHODS The clinical data of 67 patients, clinically diagnosed as epilepsy, were analyzed retrospectively. Visual analysis and NeuroGam software analysis were used for independent analysis. The 2 methods were used to compare the efficacy indicator of the diagnosis of epileptogenic zone, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve evaluated the diagnostic efficacy. RESULTS Through the final clinical diagnostic comprehensive localization, among 67 epilepsy patients, the epileptogenic zone in 51 cases could be located distinctly, and those in 16 cases could not be located. Compared to the visual analysis, the NeuroGam software analysis was more sensitive in the location of epileptogenic zone (χ²=4.876, P=0.027). The area under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the NeuroGam software and visual analyses was 0.760 and 0.689, (0.613, 0.908) and (0.547, 0.832), respectively. However, the consistency of the 2 methods was poor (Kappa=0.367, P=0.001). Compared to visual analysis, the NeuroGam software analysis exerted more advantages in the localization diagnosis of the epileptogenic zone (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS In the location diagnosis of brain perfusion, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) epileptogenic zone was used in interictal phase of seizures, and NeuroGam software analysis exerted a distinct added value for visual analysis.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29531211 PMCID: PMC5861764 DOI: 10.12659/msm.908437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Baseline data of all subjects.
| Epileptic patients | |
|---|---|
| Number of cases | 67 |
| Age (y) | 42.2±10.7 (23–61) |
| Gender (M/F) | 36/31 |
| Handedness (L/R) | 11/56 |
| Course of disease (y) | 9.4±4.8 |
| Seizure frequency (n/y) | 8.3±2.5 |
| Medication (y) | 5.2±3.7 |
Comparison of the localization results of the epileptogenic foci by SPECT visual analysis and NeuroGam software analysis, and the final clinical localization results of epileptogenic zone in 67 cases of epilepsy patients.
| Final result | Visual analysis | NeuroGam software analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clearly localized | Could not be located | Uncertain | Clearly localized | Could not be located | Uncertain | |
| Clearly localized | 29 | 12 | 10 | 42 | 5 | 4 |
| Could not be located | 3 | 7 | 6 | 5 | 7 | 4 |
| Total | 32 | 19 | 16 | 47 | 12 | 8 |
Figure 1ROC curve of SPECT visual analysis in 67 cases of epileptic patients. (AUC: 0.689; P=0.023; 95% CI: 0.547–0.832). ROC – receiver operating characteristic; AUC – area under ROC curve; SPECT – single photon emission computed tomography.
Figure 2ROC curve of NeuroGam software analysis in 67 cases of epileptic patients (AUC: 0.760; P=0.002; 95% CI: 0.613–0.908). ROC – receiver operating characteristic; AUC – area under ROC curve.
Comparison of each diagnostic efficacy parameter by SPECT visual analysis and NeuroGam software analysis in 67 cases of epilepsy patients.
| PPV | NPV | Ac | Se | Sp | Uncertainty | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | + | − | |
| Visual analysis | 29 | 3 | 7 | 12 | 36 | 15 | 29 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 16 | 51 |
| NeuroGam software analysis | 42 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 49 | 10 | 42 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 8 | 59 |
Se represented statistical significance, χ2=4.876, P=0.027.
Consistency test of localization results of epileptogenic zone by SPECT visual analysis and NeuroGam software analysis in 67 cases of epilepsy patients.
| SPECT visual analysis | Total | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clearly localized | Could not be located | |||
| NeuroGam software analysis | Clearly localized | 32 | 13 | 45 |
| Could not be located | 0 | 6 | 6 | |
| Total | 32 | 19 | ||
The consistency of the localization diagnosis results of epileptogenic zone by SPECT visual analysis and NeuroGam software analysis is poor (Kappa=0.367, P=0.001). The positive rates of NeuroGam software analysis and visual analysis were 88.2% (45/51) and 62.7% (32/51), respectively with a statistically significant difference (P<0.001).
Figure 3A 48-years-old male patient. (A, B). Z-value map of semi-quantitative analysis by NeuroGam software. (C) Comparison of rCBF hypoperfusion area in Brodmann 10, 45, 46 zones of the left frontal lobe and normal databases (represented by standard deviation). (D). The left frontal Brodmann 10, 45, and 46 zones were decreased by 2.4, 3.9, and 3.1 SD, respectively, and the right frontal Brodmann 10, 45, and 46 zones were decreased by 1.3, 1.2, and 1.0 SD, respectively, suggesting that the lesion was located in the left frontal lobe (Brodmann 10, 45, 46 zone). rCBF – regional cerebral blood flow.