Literature DB >> 29531041

Structural changes of TasA in biofilm formation of Bacillus subtilis.

Anne Diehl1, Yvette Roske2, Linda Ball1, Anup Chowdhury1, Matthias Hiller1, Noel Molière3, Regina Kramer3, Daniel Stöppler1,4, Catherine L Worth1, Brigitte Schlegel1, Martina Leidert1, Nils Cremer1, Natalja Erdmann1, Daniel Lopez5, Heike Stephanowitz1, Eberhard Krause1, Barth-Jan van Rossum1, Peter Schmieder1, Udo Heinemann6,4, Kürşad Turgay7, Ümit Akbey1,8, Hartmut Oschkinat9,4.   

Abstract

Microorganisms form surface-attached communities, termed biofilms, which can serve as protection against host immune reactions or antibiotics. Bacillus subtilis biofilms contain TasA as major proteinaceous component in addition to exopolysaccharides. In stark contrast to the initially unfolded biofilm proteins of other bacteria, TasA is a soluble, stably folded monomer, whose structure we have determined by X-ray crystallography. Subsequently, we characterized in vitro different oligomeric forms of TasA by NMR, EM, X-ray diffraction, and analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) experiments. However, by magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR on live biofilms, a swift structural change toward only one of these forms, consisting of homogeneous and protease-resistant, β-sheet-rich fibrils, was observed in vivo. Thereby, we characterize a structural change from a globular state to a fibrillar form in a functional prokaryotic system on the molecular level.
Copyright © 2018 the Author(s). Published by PNAS.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bacillus subtilis; NMR; TasA; biofilm; structure

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29531041      PMCID: PMC5879678          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718102115

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


Bacteria-forming biofilms are commonly embedded in an extracellular matrix that consists of secreted proteins that form fibrils, exopolysaccharides (EPS), and sometimes extracellular DNA (1). Additional protein components with specific functions such as hydrophobins have recently been identified and characterized (2–6). Bacteria in biofilms are generally more resistant to environmental stress and less susceptible to antibiotics; hence infections associated with biofilm formation are more difficult to treat (7). In combination with EPS, TasA is a major component of Bacillus subtilis biofilms (8, 9). It was first described as a spore-associated protein with antibacterial activity (10, 11) and differs from other biofilm-forming proteins by the apparent lack of repeats in its sequence. TasA preparations from the supernatant of B. subtilis mutant cells lacking EPS but highly expressing TasA yield oligomeric forms with an average molecular mass of 600 kDa (8, 9). These TasA preparations fibrillize on hydrophobic surfaces and at low pH, suggesting that TasA can form fibrils that stabilize the B. subtilis biofilm (8, 9, 12, 13). There is also a minor biofilm protein component, TapA, which may be responsible for anchoring the fibers onto the bacterial cell wall and participating in TasA fiber formation, albeit to a lesser extent (at a 1:100 ratio relative to TasA) (14, 15). In bacilli, biofilm formation is genetically controlled by the regulatory repressor and anti-repressor proteins, SinI and SinR (8, 16–21). In B. subtilis, the SinR controlled operon contains the gene triad tapA–sipW–tasA (13, 16, 17). The membrane-bound peptidase SipW cleaves the signal peptides of TapA and TasA before secretion (22, 23). Intriguingly, in pathogenic Bacillus cereus or Bacillus anthracis strains, the tasA operon contains a SipW homolog together with tasA-like genes named calY1 and calY2. The respective proteins are members of the zinc-dependent M73 metalloproteinase family, usually termed camelysins (24, 25), and are considered important for the pathogenicity of B. cereus and B. anthracis (26–29). Double deletion of both calY loci in B. cereus leads to defects in biofilm formation (24, 25). In this work, we present a high-resolution crystal structure of soluble, monomeric TasA in its mature secreted form. Despite its apparent homology to camelysins, biochemical experiments suggest that TasA is not an active protease. As a basis for understanding the structural changes occurring during fiber and biofilm formation, the monomer and multimeric forms were investigated in vitro and in vivo by NMR, analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC), and other biophysical techniques. In particular, we analyzed in vitro the transformation of soluble monomeric TasA into two different states, a gel-like form and fibrils. Magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR applied to biofilms that were generated by adding soluble, monomeric and isotope-labeled TasA to the medium of B. subtilis ΔtasA cultures allowed probing of the in vivo situation, revealing the formation of homogeneous TasA fibers as the major proteinaceous extracellular matrix component. Thereby, we characterized the transition of folded TasA into fibrils, both in vitro and in its natural biofilm environment on a molecular level.

Results

The Structure of Monomeric TasA Investigated by X-Ray Crystallography and NMR Reveals a Jellyroll Fold and Flexible PP-Helices.

Two different TasA constructs were prepared for structural and biophysical studies (Fig. 1). Mature TasA261 (amino acids 28–261) is found outside the cell after cleavage of the N-terminal signal sequence (amino acids 1–27). TasA239 comprises the core domain and ranges from amino acids 28 to 239 as suggested by standard bioinformatic analysis (). According to gel filtration chromatography (Fig. 1), both proteins are predominantly monomeric when freshly prepared at pH 7, with TasA261 showing a higher tendency to form oligomers than TasA239.
Fig. 1.

(A) Representation of TasA (gray, signal sequence, residues 1–27; blue, secreted TasA, residues 28–261) and the two recombinant proteins investigated in this study, TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue). (B) Gel filtration profiles of TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue). (C) Zoom into a superposition of the solution 15N–1H correlation NMR spectra of TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue).

(A) Representation of TasA (gray, signal sequence, residues 1–27; blue, secreted TasA, residues 28–261) and the two recombinant proteins investigated in this study, TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue). (B) Gel filtration profiles of TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue). (C) Zoom into a superposition of the solution 15N1H correlation NMR spectra of TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue). Furthermore, the solution NMR 15N1H heteronuclear single-quantum coherence (HSQC) spectrum () of TasA261 revealed a globular fold, and the cross peaks of 220 residues were assigned. The C terminus in TasA261 is unstructured according to the random coil chemical shifts associated with the cross peaks of the respective residues (Fig. 1 and ) and according to bioinformatics (see above). For residues 115 and 116, and in the region 174–177, peak doubling is observed in the 15N1H HSQC spectra of both forms (). Both TasA261 and TasA239 were prone to slow degradation () requiring the use of protease inhibitors. The protein unfolds in the presence of 1% SDS (). Selenomethionine (SeMet) incorporated TasA239 was crystallized at pH 4.6 and a structure obtained at 1.56-Å resolution by anomalous-diffraction phasing (Fig. 2 and ).
Fig. 2.

(A) Overall crystal structure of SeMet-TasA239 in cartoon representation. An undefined region (amino acids 117–125) is indicated by a dotted line. Bound salicylate (yellow) and ethylene glycol (cyan) molecules are depicted as sticks and with oxygen atoms in red. The magnification at Top Right shows the hydrophobic pocket in surface representation with the bound salicylate. Aromatic residues are colored in green, polar residues in gray, and positively charged residues in blue. The two regions forming polyproline helices (PPII) are highlighted in magenta and magnified to the Right in frames 1 and 2. (B) Secondary-structure topology. β-Strands forming the β-sheets 1 and 2 (light blue boxes) are shown as arrows and helices as red cylinders. (C) TasA orientated as in A with B factors indicated by ribbon thickness and color (blue indicates low and red indicates high B values). The amino acid regions 30–50, 73–78, and 186–189 show higher B-factor values. (D) Electrostatic surface potential of TasA in two orientations. The color scale is set from −4 kT/e (red) to +4 kT/e (blue), as calculated by Pymol. The pictures to the Left and Right show the back and front view of TasA, respectively, with regard to the orientation in A. (E) Surface representation of TasA. Residues showing strong NMR shifts upon titration of a TasA solution with MnCl2 are highlighted in magenta.

(A) Overall crystal structure of SeMet-TasA239 in cartoon representation. An undefined region (amino acids 117–125) is indicated by a dotted line. Bound salicylate (yellow) and ethylene glycol (cyan) molecules are depicted as sticks and with oxygen atoms in red. The magnification at Top Right shows the hydrophobic pocket in surface representation with the bound salicylate. Aromatic residues are colored in green, polar residues in gray, and positively charged residues in blue. The two regions forming polyproline helices (PPII) are highlighted in magenta and magnified to the Right in frames 1 and 2. (B) Secondary-structure topology. β-Strands forming the β-sheets 1 and 2 (light blue boxes) are shown as arrows and helices as red cylinders. (C) TasA orientated as in A with B factors indicated by ribbon thickness and color (blue indicates low and red indicates high B values). The amino acid regions 30–50, 73–78, and 186–189 show higher B-factor values. (D) Electrostatic surface potential of TasA in two orientations. The color scale is set from −4 kT/e (red) to +4 kT/e (blue), as calculated by Pymol. The pictures to the Left and Right show the back and front view of TasA, respectively, with regard to the orientation in A. (E) Surface representation of TasA. Residues showing strong NMR shifts upon titration of a TasA solution with MnCl2 are highlighted in magenta. The structure of TasA in its globular monomeric form consists of a jellyroll fold composed of two antiparallel β-sheets flanked by six, in part very short helices, and longer loop regions (Fig. 2 ). Intriguingly, the structure shows areas of varying rigidity. In general, B values (Fig. 2) are much higher in the lower area (referring to the orientation shown in Fig. 2 ; residues 30–50, 73–78, and 186–189) than in other parts of the structure, and no density was observed for residues 117–126; henceforth, this area is called the “dynamic section.” The region spatially close to residues 117–126 is very well ordered and shows low B factors. On the other hand, multiple NMR signals were observed for residues T115, V116, and the stretch 174–177 of both TasA239 and TasA261. Notably, the neighboring loop 117–126 contains a proline (P125); hence, a potential cis-trans isomerization in this section could cause the doubling of signals by producing two chemically different environments. The dynamic section also comprises segments with polyproline II (PPII) helical structure. One PPII helix (amino acids TPTDFD, residues 187–192) is located directly before β8; another short PPII helix (amino acids ASG, 40–42) is observed at the N terminus close to β1 (Fig. 2, frames 1 and 2). These PPII helices display marked flexibility, although they are stabilized by water molecules forming a regular network of hydrogen bonds with their backbone carbonyl oxygens (Fig. 2, frames 1 and 2). The electrostatic surface potential of TasA (Fig. 2) reveals two large, negatively charged patches, one located in the area with the flexible turns (at Bottom in Fig. 2) and the second located on the surface of sheet 2. Residues anchored in the strands forming sheet 1 create a positively charged surface (Fig. 2). A salicylate molecule is bound in a hydrophobic pocket between the two β-sheets (Fig. 2 and ). Wild-type TasA239, crystallized in the absence of salicylate (), showed an ethylene glycol molecule bound in the hydrophobic pocket, and three others in loop regions (), with small structural overall differences (backbone r.m.s.d. of 0.124 Å; ). In summary, the presented structure of monomeric soluble TasA shows sections with an intriguing difference in dynamics and will guide experiments geared at the understanding of conformational changes before fibril formation.

Structural Homology to Camelysin Metalloproteases.

A comparison of our structure with structures in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) using DALI (30) identified distant structural homologs that share the jellyroll topology (e.g., PDB ID codes 3WIN, 4DY5, 4AQB, 4DXZ, and 1SPP) and that are involved in a large variety of biological functions. The proposed structural similarity with camelysins was demonstrated by modeling () after producing a structure-based sequence alignment (). However, protease activity was not found for TasA and the binding of divalent cations (17, 31) was negligible according to isothermal titration calorimetry, NMR, and crystallization experiments (Fig. 2 and ), in contrast to reports for camelysin (27, 28). B. subtilis cells are known to secrete various extracellular proteases, also under biofilm conditions; therefore, these results suggest that such secreted proteases change to biofilm-stabilizing fibrillar structures. During such an evolutionary process, the intrinsic protease activity might have been lost in individual cases such as TasA.

TasA Assumes Monomeric, Oligomeric, and Various Polymeric Forms in Vitro, but B. subtilis Biofilms Contain Predominantly Homogeneous TasA Fibrils.

In line with investigations by Chai et al. (12) on mature TasA isolated from the supernatant of an exopolysaccharide-negative strain, our recombinant TasA formed monomers, oligomers with a defined number of subunits, as well as polymers, often of fibrillar nature. In the following sections, we characterize the various forms of TasA occurring at different pH, temperature, and time, and establish which of those forms are taking part in biofilm formation in vivo. To this end, we applied AUC, electron microscopy (EM), mass spectrometry, and H/D exchange followed by NMR in vitro, complemented by in vivo NMR on B. subtilis biofilms.

pH dependence of structural transitions.

When freshly prepared at pH 7.0, according to AUC, TasA261 consists of ∼80% monomers and around 20% of presumed dodecamers with smaller oligomers appearing at a low level (Fig. 1 and ). The frictional coefficient (f/fo) of 1.4 indicates a globularly folded protein (32). When adjusting pH to a value of 3.0 by overnight dialysis, the 3D structure of TasA remains intact as detected by NMR (), and AUC analysis shows several oligomeric forms next to a fraction of 66% monomer (). However, polymeric forms appear under both conditions (pH 7.0 and pH 3.0) after incubating the samples for 2 wk at 40 °C (). As is common for polymers, larger species distributed over a wider molecular weight range and few oligomeric forms, presumably dodecamers, are observed in AUC experiments (). Interestingly, the frictional coefficients of around 2.6 for these larger species are indicative of fibrils () (32). In line with this observation, Thioflavin T (ThT) can stain these fibrils (), and they appear insoluble when analyzed by SDS/PAGE (). These results were corroborated by EM investigations and fiber diffraction (Fig. 3). The fiber diffraction results (Fig. 3) suggest the presence of at least a subpopulation of cross-β-sheet–forming TasA species, as indicative of amyloid-like structures.
Fig. 3.

(A) Electron micrograph of TasA261 fibers grown at pH 3 and 40 °C over 2 wk. (B) The sample shown in A mounted onto a MiTeGen micromesh loop used for fiber diffraction experiments. The red circles indicate the X-ray beam size and position for two different beam diameters of 50 µm (solid line) and 75 µm (dashed line) as appearing on the monitor. (C) Fiber diffraction pattern of TasA261 showing reflection arcs that are oriented on the meridian at 4.75 Å and on the equatorial axis at 10.4 Å, which indicate the presence of cross β-structures. (D) Schematic drawing of a typical cross-β diffraction pattern with a characteristic 4.7- to 4.8-Å diffraction signal on the meridian corresponding to the distance between hydrogen-bonded β-strands that run perpendicular to the fiber axis. The more diffuse signal on the equator at a distance of 10–12 Å results from the association of the β-sheets.

(A) Electron micrograph of TasA261 fibers grown at pH 3 and 40 °C over 2 wk. (B) The sample shown in A mounted onto a MiTeGen micromesh loop used for fiber diffraction experiments. The red circles indicate the X-ray beam size and position for two different beam diameters of 50 µm (solid line) and 75 µm (dashed line) as appearing on the monitor. (C) Fiber diffraction pattern of TasA261 showing reflection arcs that are oriented on the meridian at 4.75 Å and on the equatorial axis at 10.4 Å, which indicate the presence of cross β-structures. (D) Schematic drawing of a typical cross-β diffraction pattern with a characteristic 4.7- to 4.8-Å diffraction signal on the meridian corresponding to the distance between hydrogen-bonded β-strands that run perpendicular to the fiber axis. The more diffuse signal on the equator at a distance of 10–12 Å results from the association of the β-sheets. Notably, a downshift to pH 3 by dialysis leads to a vanishing of the oligomer peak(s) and polymeric forms appear (Fig. 4). ThT assays (Fig. 4) show a strong increase in fluorescence without lag phase within the first 100 min for both TasA239 and TasA261 when pH is adjusted by adding HCl. However, at pH 7, this increase in fluorescence is not observed in the same time frame at room temperature. We assume that unfolding occurs upon rapid transition to low pH, as demonstrated by NMR spectroscopy on dialyzed or rapidly pH-adjusted TasA solutions, showing 15N1H correlations of folded monomer in the former case () and of unfolded protein in the latter ().
Fig. 4.

(A) AUC of TasA261 stored for 16 wk at −20 °C, pH 7, and dialyzed toward pH 3.5 and 3.0. (B) ThT assay of TasA261 (black) incubated at pH 7 and 3, and at a temperature of 20 °C. Additionally, direct comparisons of the ThT response of TasA261 (blue) and TasA239 (red) at the same pH settings, concentrations, and time points are shown. (C) Fibrils detected by EM on TasA261 incubated for 2 wk at pH 7.0 and 40 °C. (D) EM of TasA261 precipitated during sample concentration, same sample as in F. (E) 15N–1H-HSQC of a 2H,15N,13C-TasA261 solution. Arrows 1 and 2 indicate the signals of G175 and T115, respectively. (F) 15N–1H-MAS NMR correlation of the 2H,15N,13C-labeled precipitate generated by concentrating a solution; amide protons are reexchanged in 30% D2O. The signals labeled with an asterisk show special chemical shifts and are unique to this spectrum. (G) 15N–1H-MAS NMR correlation of high–molecular-weight aggregates isolated after 5 mo from an otherwise intact, 2H,15N,13C-labeled TasA239 solution NMR sample. Arrows 1 and 2 denote the same signals as in E; arrow 3 denotes a very strong signal unique to this spectrum. The ellipsoid indicates an area with signals whose chemical shifts are typical for residues in α-helices and turns. (H) 15N–1H-MAS NMR correlation of a biofilm formed by a B. subtilis ΔtasA strain after supply of recombinant, 2H,15N,13C-labeled TasA261. The circle indicates the position of a signal appearing at lower contour levels. (I) Processes leading to fiber formation after TasA secretion (i and ii) and from externally provided protein in reconstitution experiments (iii). In all cases, but in particular for pathway iii, a supporting role of TapA or EPS is expected. EPS are not shown.

(A) AUC of TasA261 stored for 16 wk at −20 °C, pH 7, and dialyzed toward pH 3.5 and 3.0. (B) ThT assay of TasA261 (black) incubated at pH 7 and 3, and at a temperature of 20 °C. Additionally, direct comparisons of the ThT response of TasA261 (blue) and TasA239 (red) at the same pH settings, concentrations, and time points are shown. (C) Fibrils detected by EM on TasA261 incubated for 2 wk at pH 7.0 and 40 °C. (D) EM of TasA261 precipitated during sample concentration, same sample as in F. (E) 15N1H-HSQC of a 2H,15N,13C-TasA261 solution. Arrows 1 and 2 indicate the signals of G175 and T115, respectively. (F) 15N1H-MAS NMR correlation of the 2H,15N,13C-labeled precipitate generated by concentrating a solution; amide protons are reexchanged in 30% D2O. The signals labeled with an asterisk show special chemical shifts and are unique to this spectrum. (G) 15N1H-MAS NMR correlation of high–molecular-weight aggregates isolated after 5 mo from an otherwise intact, 2H,15N,13C-labeled TasA239 solution NMR sample. Arrows 1 and 2 denote the same signals as in E; arrow 3 denotes a very strong signal unique to this spectrum. The ellipsoid indicates an area with signals whose chemical shifts are typical for residues in α-helices and turns. (H) 15N1H-MAS NMR correlation of a biofilm formed by a B. subtilis ΔtasA strain after supply of recombinant, 2H,15N,13C-labeled TasA261. The circle indicates the position of a signal appearing at lower contour levels. (I) Processes leading to fiber formation after TasA secretion (i and ii) and from externally provided protein in reconstitution experiments (iii). In all cases, but in particular for pathway iii, a supporting role of TapA or EPS is expected. EPS are not shown. We noted that solution NMR samples of TasA (pH 7.0) become gel-like over time. Such viscous protein preparation that was stored for 16 wk at −20 °C showed a much larger fraction of oligomeric TasA in AUC experiments (Fig. 4) compared with freshly prepared TasA.

Initial structural characterization of high–molecular-weight forms by NMR.

The structural differences between monomers and various types of high–molecular-weight aggregates characterized above are apparent from a comparison of 15N1H correlation spectra (Fig. 4 ). The 15N1H HSQC spectrum of a TasA261 solution shows the fingerprint of a folded, soluble domain with exceptionally characteristic signals (arrows in Fig. 4 and ). Those peaks are assigned to residues T115 (arrow 2) and G175 (arrow 1) and show unusual chemical shift values as well as peak doubling presumably due to their proximity to the disordered region 117–125 and a possible cis/trans isomerization of P125. Precipitates formed by TasA261 during concentration of a sample are of fibrillar nature, as demonstrated by EM (Fig. 4). These fibrils yielded a surprisingly well-resolved MAS NMR cross-polarization (CP)–based 15N1H correlation spectrum (Fig. 4) that indicates a high β-structure content by the chemical shift distribution and high homogeneity due to the absence of signal splitting or doubling. Twenty-one cross peaks with chemical shifts >9.5 ppm are observed, whereas the solution spectrum exposes only 8 in this region. There are several signals with unusual 15N chemical shifts δ < 100 ppm and δ > 135 ppm. In Fig. 4, nine signals with unusual chemical shifts occur that are indicated by asterisks; these signals are not present in the solution spectrum. Vice versa, the signals indicated by arrows in the solution spectrum (Fig. 4) are no longer present in the spectrum of the precipitate (Fig. 4). The superposition of these two spectra shows only few accidental matches of cross-peak positions () but otherwise large differences, indicating substantial structural changes. Methods for enforcing fibril formation such as extruding into 70% methanol lead to similar NMR spectra as shown in Fig. 4 but indicate the presence of heterogeneous fibrils. Since we noted that solution NMR samples of TasA (pH 7.0) become gel-like over time, larger protein assemblies of TasA239 were spun down from a sample stored at pH 7 and ambient temperatures over 16 wk to obtain a fingerprint by MAS NMR. The CP-based 15N1H correlation (Fig. 4) shows characteristic features of the folded monomer. Among those are the signals of T115 and G175 (arrows in Fig. 4 ), including the respective peak doubling. It is unlikely that these signals occur due to coprecipitated monomers since the cross-polarization unit of the used pulse sequence would not excite them. They most likely result from a conservation of monomer structure in those aggregates. Overall, the signals of this type of high–molecular-weight species are distributed in the same spectral range as the signals in the solution spectrum (), with one important difference: a larger number of cross peaks is observed in the area between 6.5- and 8-ppm proton chemical shifts and 115- and 123-ppm nitrogen chemical shifts (ellipsoid, Fig. 4), indicating a higher content of helical or loop structure. Comparing that spectrum to the spectrum of fibrils clearly shows that it is substantially different (). Taken together, the above data indicate that TasA may occur in three structurally different forms; monomers and two distinctly different but largely homogeneous types of high–molecular-weight aggregates, with characteristic NMR spectra. One of these forms (termed “precipitate” below) shows spectra with high β-content as expected for fibrils (Fig. 4), in agreement with prior biophysical characterization (Fig. 4), while the other is characterized by a higher content of helical or loop structure (Fig. 4). Structural differences between the fibrillar and monomeric form were also detected by H/D exchange experiments (). The enhancement of fibril formation in vitro by, for example, rapid pH shift strongly suggests that the concomitant forced formation of unfolded protomers might accelerate the transition into TasA fibrils that are characterized by a higher β-sheet content. Worth of note, such “enforced” fibrils were found to be heterogeneous.

Structural characterization and protease resistance of TasA in native biofilm.

For obtaining a fingerprint of TasA present in biofilms, a B. subtilis tasA deletion strain that still secretes TapA and EPS was employed and biofilm formation successfully rescued (9) via the addition of recombinantly produced 2H,13C,15N-TasA261 (). More than 90% of the supplied protein to the medium could be detected in the subsequently formed biofilm (). Extracellular proteases are secreted by B. subtilis cells also during biofilm formation (33, 34). We could detect these proteases by a high protease activity of the cell-free B. subtilis biofilm supernatant against Azocasein. Nevertheless, a very high stability of supplied TasA261 toward such proteolytic attack can be observed (), strongly suggesting that the TasA fibrils formed in the biofilm are resistant to own proteases. In situ solid-state MAS NMR of the harvested biofilm yielded a CP-based 15N1H HSQC spectrum with decent resolution (Fig. 4). This spectrum shows all special features of that obtained on fibrils (Fig. 4). A superposition of both spectra () shows a surprising match, with all distinctive signals that are labeled with an asterisk in Fig. 4 being present in the spectrum of the biofilm, in one case at lower plot levels (indicated by a circle in Fig. 4). On the contrary, a superposition with the spectrum of the gel-like form () reveals strong differences in key peak positions (e.g., see arrow 3 in Fig. 4 and peaks in this area, also the signals indicated by the ellipsoid). The characteristic signals of the gel-like sample also do not appear at low contour levels in the biofilm spectrum (). There is only a small subset of signals that show chemical shift differences, tentatively connected by curved lines in . For these reasons, and based on the in vitro characterization of this fibrillar sample by EM (Fig. 4) and other techniques, we conclude that native B. subtilis biofilms predominantly contain homogeneous protease-resistant TasA fibrils.

Discussion

In this work, we present a high-resolution structure of TasA that provides the starting point for investigations of structural changes preceding Bacillus biofilm formation, representing at the same time a 3D structure of a M73 metalloprotease family member. In this way, we provide a structural basis for understanding camelysins (), which play important roles in the pathogenicity of, for example, B. anthracis. Most importantly, our results uncover the high conformational variability of TasA, facilitating structural changes as a prerequisite for fibril formation. The structure of the TasA monomer consists of a rigid frame and a set of loops with high flexibility in the “dynamic section” (lower section in Fig. 2) where two PPII helices are also located that may function as conformational switches. PPII helices can change into right-handed α-helices or β-strands by shifting only one dihedral angle per residue (35). Intriguingly, PPII helices were shown to play an important role in conformational changes resulting in amyloid fibrils formed by the prion protein or amyloidogenic lysozyme (36–39). We assume that the structural plasticity in the dynamic section may potentially facilitate interactions that promote the formation of fibrillar structures. The fact that TasA folds into a globular structure as a monomer represents a fundamental difference to the well-known major biofilm-forming proteins CsgA and FapC, which exist as unstructured proteins in their monomeric forms (2, 3). In case of TasA, two different scenarios (Fig. 4, pathways i and ii) concerning the fate of the secreted protein may be relevant in vivo: (i) secreted soluble monomeric TasA could fold right after secretion and transform from there into the fibrillar structure or, alternatively, (ii) the still unfolded secreted monomer could also switch directly to the fibrillar form. Furthermore, the application of purified soluble monomeric recombinant TasA or secreted endogenous TasA from natural source (12) can complement the defect in biofilm formation of TasA-negative mutants (9) (Fig. 4, pathway iii). The TasA protein supplied in our biofilm reconstitution experiment remains folded when slowly dialyzed to a pH of 3 (pathway iii), which suggests that the transition of TasA from a monomeric fold into a fibrillar structure could be promoted by other partners. Given the long timescale at which fibrils are formed at neutral pH and room temperature (several days to weeks), we conclude from the large amount of fibrous protein appearing more rapid in the in vivo experiment (hours) that fibril formation is promoted in a “catalytic” fashion (Fig. 4, pathway iii) by TapA, EPS, or the characteristics of the B. subtilis surface (40), which facilitate the conformational transition between both structural arrangements. A possible low local pH, close to the bacterial surface and in the EPS environment, may additionally destabilize TasA, despite its overall pH stability. The view into the in vivo situation reveals a small subset of signals in the biofilm MAS NMR spectrum that show different chemical shifts than the respective signals of fibrils obtained in vitro (, curved lines). Given the nearly perfect fit of most other exposed signals, this suggests specific interactions with, for example, TapA or EPS in the biofilm, which cannot occur in the in vitro experiment. Interestingly, the TasA structure determined here by X-ray crystallography reveals different proportions of secondary-structure elements than originally concluded from CD spectroscopy by Chai et al. (12), who suggested high α-helical content. However, we observe high β-sheet content in the monomer structure () and that a considerable fraction of the helical part (∼50%) is formed by 310 or PPII helices (41). Our CD spectra recorded on recombinant TasA () showed a comparable shape to those published (12), displaying a minimum at 208 nm (), the occurrence of which is also due to contributions by the PPII helices according to Sreerama and Woody (37, 42). To our surprise, unfolding of TasA by heat denaturation did not change the spectra significantly, although a temperature of 90 °C was reached and a clear transition point (Tm = 50 °C) could be determined (). This was substantiated by a 15N1H NMR spectrum of a sample incubated before at 60 °C, displaying the characteristic signal pattern of an unfolded protein (). We considered a possible specific protease activity of the globular form of TasA due to similarities to camelysins that belong to the Peptidase_M73 superfamily (26). In the different B. cereus strains, two camelysins are encoded in the same operon together with the sipW gene. They are reported to be involved in surface biofilm formation, and they are also able to form fibrillar structures (24, 25). However, our results suggest that TasA from the nonpathogenic B. subtilis strains lost the ability to bind divalent cations like Zn2+ that is required for protease activity. In summary, we have demonstrated that TasA undergoes substantial conformational changes in the course of Bacillus subtilis biofilm maturation. The X-ray structure of monomeric TasA provides a structural basis for understanding this transition, revealing flexible segments and PPII helices together in the dynamic section of the structure. Interestingly, different in vitro experiments, including X-ray fiber diffraction, suggest the presence of a population of cross-β-sheet–containing TasA species (Fig. 3) and hence amyloid-like structures in the formed, protease-resistant fibers, in accordance with Romero et al. (9). For studies of functional fibril formation from a globular state, TasA can thus serve as a model system.

Materials and Methods

EM.

For EM, formvar-carbon film-coated grids were glow-discharged, and a drop of protein sample was applied on the grids, blotted via filter paper, and negatively stained by 3% aqueous uranyl acetate. Dry grids were imaged at Tecnai G2 200-kV or Zeiss 900 80-kV transmission electron microscopes. Images were taken at 50,000× magnification.

Data Availability.

The atomic coordinates of TasA239 in presence and absence of salicylate have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (PDB ID codes 5OF1 and 5OF2, respectively). Additional information on materials and methods is provided in .
  42 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections.

Authors:  J W Costerton; P S Stewart; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-05-21       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Camelysin is a novel surface metalloproteinase from Bacillus cereus.

Authors:  Gregor Grass; Angelika Schierhorn; Eduard Sorkau; Helmut Müller; Peter Rücknagel; Dietrich H Nies; Beate Fricke
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.441

3.  A major protein component of the Bacillus subtilis biofilm matrix.

Authors:  Steven S Branda; Frances Chu; Daniel B Kearns; Richard Losick; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.501

4.  Targets of the master regulator of biofilm formation in Bacillus subtilis.

Authors:  Frances Chu; Daniel B Kearns; Steven S Branda; Roberto Kolter; Richard Losick
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 5.  Polyproline-II helix in proteins: structure and function.

Authors:  Alexei A Adzhubei; Michael J E Sternberg; Alexander A Makarov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 6.  Amyloid Structures as Biofilm Matrix Scaffolds.

Authors:  Agustina Taglialegna; Iñigo Lasa; Jaione Valle
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Functional analysis of the accessory protein TapA in Bacillus subtilis amyloid fiber assembly.

Authors:  Diego Romero; Hera Vlamakis; Richard Losick; Roberto Kolter
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 3.490

8.  The cell envelope-bound metalloprotease (camelysin) from Bacillus cereus is a possible pathogenic factor.

Authors:  B Fricke; K Drössler; I Willhardt; A Schierhorn; S Menge; P Rücknagel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2001-09-28

9.  Identification of catabolite repression as a physiological regulator of biofilm formation by Bacillus subtilis by use of DNA microarrays.

Authors:  Nicola R Stanley; Robert A Britton; Alan D Grossman; Beth A Lazazzera
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Twenty years of the MEROPS database of proteolytic enzymes, their substrates and inhibitors.

Authors:  Neil D Rawlings; Alan J Barrett; Robert Finn
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  23 in total

Review 1.  Biofilms: Architecture, Resistance, Quorum Sensing and Control Mechanisms.

Authors:  Priti Saxena; Yogesh Joshi; Kartik Rawat; Renu Bisht
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 2.  Emerging Roles of Functional Bacterial Amyloids in Gene Regulation, Toxicity, and Immunomodulation.

Authors:  Nir Salinas; Tatyana L Povolotsky; Meytal Landau; Ilana Kolodkin-Gal
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Nanomechanical properties of steric zipper globular structures.

Authors:  Neta Lester-Zer; Mnar Ghrayeb; Liraz Chai
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Carbapenem Use Is Driving the Evolution of Imipenemase 1 Variants.

Authors:  Zishuo Cheng; Christopher R Bethel; Pei W Thomas; Ben A Shurina; John-Paul Alao; Caitlyn A Thomas; Kundi Yang; Steven H Marshall; Huan Zhang; Aidan M Sturgill; Andrea N Kravats; Richard C Page; Walter Fast; Robert A Bonomo; Michael W Crowder
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Bacillus subtilis biofilm formation and social interactions.

Authors:  Sofia Arnaouteli; Natalie C Bamford; Nicola R Stanley-Wall; Ákos T Kovács
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 60.633

6.  Archaeal bundling pili of Pyrobaculum calidifontis reveal similarities between archaeal and bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Fengbin Wang; Virginija Cvirkaite-Krupovic; Mart Krupovic; Edward H Egelman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 7.  Functional amyloids from bacterial biofilms - structural properties and interaction partners.

Authors:  Ümit Akbey; Maria Andreasen
Journal:  Chem Sci       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 9.969

Review 8.  Solid-State NMR Investigations of Extracellular Matrixes and Cell Walls of Algae, Bacteria, Fungi, and Plants.

Authors:  Nader Ghassemi; Alexandre Poulhazan; Fabien Deligey; Frederic Mentink-Vigier; Isabelle Marcotte; Tuo Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2021-12-08       Impact factor: 72.087

Review 9.  SynBio and the Boundaries between Functional and Pathogenic RepA-WH1 Bacterial Amyloids.

Authors:  Rafael Giraldo
Journal:  mSystems       Date:  2020-06-30       Impact factor: 6.496

10.  Bacillus subtilis HelD, an RNA Polymerase Interacting Helicase, Forms Amyloid-Like Fibrils.

Authors:  Gundeep Kaur; Srajan Kapoor; Krishan G Thakur
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-08-21       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.