| Literature DB >> 29531041 |
Anne Diehl1, Yvette Roske2, Linda Ball1, Anup Chowdhury1, Matthias Hiller1, Noel Molière3, Regina Kramer3, Daniel Stöppler1,4, Catherine L Worth1, Brigitte Schlegel1, Martina Leidert1, Nils Cremer1, Natalja Erdmann1, Daniel Lopez5, Heike Stephanowitz1, Eberhard Krause1, Barth-Jan van Rossum1, Peter Schmieder1, Udo Heinemann6,4, Kürşad Turgay7, Ümit Akbey1,8, Hartmut Oschkinat9,4.
Abstract
Microorganisms form surface-attached communities, termed biofilms, which can serve as protection against host immune reactions or antibiotics. Bacillus subtilis biofilms contain TasA as major proteinaceous component in addition to exopolysaccharides. In stark contrast to the initially unfolded biofilm proteins of other bacteria, TasA is a soluble, stably folded monomer, whose structure we have determined by X-ray crystallography. Subsequently, we characterized in vitro different oligomeric forms of TasA by NMR, EM, X-ray diffraction, and analytical ultracentrifugation (AUC) experiments. However, by magic-angle spinning (MAS) NMR on live biofilms, a swift structural change toward only one of these forms, consisting of homogeneous and protease-resistant, β-sheet-rich fibrils, was observed in vivo. Thereby, we characterize a structural change from a globular state to a fibrillar form in a functional prokaryotic system on the molecular level.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus subtilis; NMR; TasA; biofilm; structure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29531041 PMCID: PMC5879678 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1718102115
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205
Fig. 1.(A) Representation of TasA (gray, signal sequence, residues 1–27; blue, secreted TasA, residues 28–261) and the two recombinant proteins investigated in this study, TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue). (B) Gel filtration profiles of TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue). (C) Zoom into a superposition of the solution 15N–1H correlation NMR spectra of TasA239 (red) and TasA261 (blue).
Fig. 2.(A) Overall crystal structure of SeMet-TasA239 in cartoon representation. An undefined region (amino acids 117–125) is indicated by a dotted line. Bound salicylate (yellow) and ethylene glycol (cyan) molecules are depicted as sticks and with oxygen atoms in red. The magnification at Top Right shows the hydrophobic pocket in surface representation with the bound salicylate. Aromatic residues are colored in green, polar residues in gray, and positively charged residues in blue. The two regions forming polyproline helices (PPII) are highlighted in magenta and magnified to the Right in frames 1 and 2. (B) Secondary-structure topology. β-Strands forming the β-sheets 1 and 2 (light blue boxes) are shown as arrows and helices as red cylinders. (C) TasA orientated as in A with B factors indicated by ribbon thickness and color (blue indicates low and red indicates high B values). The amino acid regions 30–50, 73–78, and 186–189 show higher B-factor values. (D) Electrostatic surface potential of TasA in two orientations. The color scale is set from −4 kT/e (red) to +4 kT/e (blue), as calculated by Pymol. The pictures to the Left and Right show the back and front view of TasA, respectively, with regard to the orientation in A. (E) Surface representation of TasA. Residues showing strong NMR shifts upon titration of a TasA solution with MnCl2 are highlighted in magenta.
Fig. 3.(A) Electron micrograph of TasA261 fibers grown at pH 3 and 40 °C over 2 wk. (B) The sample shown in A mounted onto a MiTeGen micromesh loop used for fiber diffraction experiments. The red circles indicate the X-ray beam size and position for two different beam diameters of 50 µm (solid line) and 75 µm (dashed line) as appearing on the monitor. (C) Fiber diffraction pattern of TasA261 showing reflection arcs that are oriented on the meridian at 4.75 Å and on the equatorial axis at 10.4 Å, which indicate the presence of cross β-structures. (D) Schematic drawing of a typical cross-β diffraction pattern with a characteristic 4.7- to 4.8-Å diffraction signal on the meridian corresponding to the distance between hydrogen-bonded β-strands that run perpendicular to the fiber axis. The more diffuse signal on the equator at a distance of 10–12 Å results from the association of the β-sheets.
Fig. 4.(A) AUC of TasA261 stored for 16 wk at −20 °C, pH 7, and dialyzed toward pH 3.5 and 3.0. (B) ThT assay of TasA261 (black) incubated at pH 7 and 3, and at a temperature of 20 °C. Additionally, direct comparisons of the ThT response of TasA261 (blue) and TasA239 (red) at the same pH settings, concentrations, and time points are shown. (C) Fibrils detected by EM on TasA261 incubated for 2 wk at pH 7.0 and 40 °C. (D) EM of TasA261 precipitated during sample concentration, same sample as in F. (E) 15N–1H-HSQC of a 2H,15N,13C-TasA261 solution. Arrows 1 and 2 indicate the signals of G175 and T115, respectively. (F) 15N–1H-MAS NMR correlation of the 2H,15N,13C-labeled precipitate generated by concentrating a solution; amide protons are reexchanged in 30% D2O. The signals labeled with an asterisk show special chemical shifts and are unique to this spectrum. (G) 15N–1H-MAS NMR correlation of high–molecular-weight aggregates isolated after 5 mo from an otherwise intact, 2H,15N,13C-labeled TasA239 solution NMR sample. Arrows 1 and 2 denote the same signals as in E; arrow 3 denotes a very strong signal unique to this spectrum. The ellipsoid indicates an area with signals whose chemical shifts are typical for residues in α-helices and turns. (H) 15N–1H-MAS NMR correlation of a biofilm formed by a B. subtilis ΔtasA strain after supply of recombinant, 2H,15N,13C-labeled TasA261. The circle indicates the position of a signal appearing at lower contour levels. (I) Processes leading to fiber formation after TasA secretion (i and ii) and from externally provided protein in reconstitution experiments (iii). In all cases, but in particular for pathway iii, a supporting role of TapA or EPS is expected. EPS are not shown.