Literature DB >> 33468463

Carbapenem Use Is Driving the Evolution of Imipenemase 1 Variants.

Zishuo Cheng1, Christopher R Bethel2, Pei W Thomas3, Ben A Shurina1, John-Paul Alao1, Caitlyn A Thomas1, Kundi Yang1, Steven H Marshall2, Huan Zhang1, Aidan M Sturgill1, Andrea N Kravats4, Richard C Page1, Walter Fast3, Robert A Bonomo5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12, Michael W Crowder4.   

Abstract

Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs) are a growing clinical threat because they inactivate nearly all β-lactam-containing antibiotics, and there are no clinically available inhibitors. A significant number of variants have already emerged for each MBL subfamily. To understand the evolution of imipenemase (IMP) genes (bla IMP) and their clinical impact, 20 clinically derived IMP-1 like variants were obtained using site-directed mutagenesis and expressed in a uniform genetic background in Escherichia coli strain DH10B. Strains of IMP-1-like variants harboring S262G or V67F substitutions exhibited increased resistance toward carbapenems and decreased resistance toward ampicillin. Strains expressing IMP-78 (S262G/V67F) exhibited the largest changes in MIC values compared to IMP-1. In order to understand the molecular mechanisms of increased resistance, biochemical, biophysical, and molecular modeling studies were conducted to compare IMP-1, IMP-6 (S262G), IMP-10 (V67F), and IMP-78 (S262G/V67F). Finally, unlike most New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM) and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase (VIM) variants, the IMP-1-like variants do not confer any additional survival advantage if zinc availability is limited. Therefore, the evolution of MBL subfamilies (i.e., IMP-6, -10, and -78) appears to be driven by different selective pressures.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IMP; S262G; V67F; beta-lactamase; carbapenemase; carbapenems; imipenemase

Year:  2021        PMID: 33468463      PMCID: PMC8097420          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.01714-20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  67 in total

Review 1.  Protein identification and analysis tools in the ExPASy server.

Authors:  M R Wilkins; E Gasteiger; A Bairoch; J C Sanchez; K L Williams; R D Appel; D F Hochstrasser
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  1999

Review 2.  OXA-type carbapenemases.

Authors:  Jan Walther-Rasmussen; Niels Høiby
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2006-01-30       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 3.  The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  David van Duin; Yohei Doi
Journal:  Virulence       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 5.882

4.  Structural and kinetic studies on metallo-β-lactamase IMP-1.

Authors:  Dionne H Griffin; Timothy K Richmond; Carlo Sanchez; Abraham Jon Moller; Robert M Breece; David L Tierney; Brian Bennett; Michael W Crowder
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 5.  Metallo-β-lactamase structure and function.

Authors:  Timothy Palzkill
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  blaNDM-21, a new variant of blaNDM in an Escherichia coli clinical isolate carrying blaCTX-M-55 and rmtB.

Authors:  Lu Liu; Yu Feng; Alan McNally; Zhiyong Zong
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2018-09-01       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Characterization of purified New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-1.

Authors:  Pei W Thomas; Min Zheng; Shanshan Wu; Hua Guo; Dali Liu; Dingguo Xu; Walter Fast
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Meropenem and chromacef intermediates observed in IMP-25 metallo-β-lactamase-catalyzed hydrolysis.

Authors:  Peter Oelschlaeger; Mahesh Aitha; Hao Yang; Joon S Kang; Antonia L Zhang; Eleanor M Liu; John D Buynak; Michael W Crowder
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  β-Lactamases and β-Lactamase Inhibitors in the 21st Century.

Authors:  Catherine L Tooke; Philip Hinchliffe; Eilis C Bragginton; Charlotte K Colenso; Viivi H A Hirvonen; Yuiko Takebayashi; James Spencer
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Comparison of Verona Integron-Borne Metallo-β-Lactamase (VIM) Variants Reveals Differences in Stability and Inhibition Profiles.

Authors:  Anne Makena; Azer Ö Düzgün; Jürgen Brem; Michael A McDonough; Anna M Rydzik; Martine I Abboud; Ayşegül Saral; Ayşegül Ç Çiçek; Cemal Sandalli; Christopher J Schofield
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Metallo-β-lactamases and a tug-of-war for the available zinc at the host-pathogen interface.

Authors:  Guillermo Bahr; Lisandro J González; Alejandro J Vila
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  Structural insights into the design of reversible fluorescent probes for metallo-β-lactamases NDM-1, VIM-2, and IMP-1.

Authors:  Sky Price; Radhika Mehta; Dominique Tan; Abigail Hinojosa; Pei W Thomas; Tawanda Cummings; Walter Fast; Emily L Que
Journal:  J Inorg Biochem       Date:  2022-05-20       Impact factor: 4.336

Review 3.  β-Lactam antibiotic targets and resistance mechanisms: from covalent inhibitors to substrates.

Authors:  Montserrat Mora-Ochomogo; Christopher T Lohans
Journal:  RSC Med Chem       Date:  2021-08-04

4.  Spectroscopic and biochemical characterization of metallo-β-lactamase IMP-1 with dicarboxylic, sulfonyl, and thiol inhibitors.

Authors:  Huan Zhang; Kundi Yang; Zishuo Cheng; Caitlyn Thomas; Abbie Steinbrunner; Cecily Pryor; Maya Vulcan; Claire Kemp; Diego Orea; Chathura Paththamperuma; Allie Y Chen; Seth M Cohen; Richard C Page; David L Tierney; Michael W Crowder
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 3.461

5.  Classification and molecular characteristics of tet(X)-carrying plasmids in Acinetobacter species.

Authors:  Chong Chen; Ping-Yu Huang; Chao-Yue Cui; Qian He; Jian Sun; Ya-Hong Liu; Jin-Lin Huang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.064

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.