Literature DB >> 2664697

American Academy of Pediatrics: Report of the Task Force on Circumcision.

.   

Abstract

Properly performed newborn circumcision prevents phimosis, paraphimosis, and balanoposthitis and has been shown to decrease the incidence of cancer of the penis among US men. It may result in a decreased incidence of urinary tract infection. However, in the absence of well-designed prospective studies, conclusions regarding the relationship of urinary tract infection to circumcision are tentative. An increased incidence of cancer of the cervix has been found in sexual partners of uncircumcised men infected with human papillomavirus. Evidence concerning the association of sexually transmitted diseases and circumcision is conflicting. Newborn circumcision is a rapid and generally safe procedure when performed by an experienced operator. It is an elective procedure to be performed only if an infant is stable and healthy. Infants respond to the procedure with transient behavioral and physiologic changes. Local anesthesia (dorsal penile nerve block) may reduce the observed physiologic response to newborn circumcision. It also has its own inherent risks. However, reports of extensive experience or follow-up with the technique in newborns are lacking. Newborn circumcision has potential medical benefits and advantages as well as disadvantages and risks. When circumcision is being considered, the benefits and risks should be explained to the parents and informed consent obtained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2664697

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  16 in total

1.  Edgar Schoen does not represent the North American view of male circumcision.

Authors:  G Hill; J V Geisheker
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 3.791

2.  Circumcision policy: A psychosocial perspective.

Authors:  Ronald Goldman
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.253

3.  Circumcision: does it prevent urinary tract infection.

Authors:  V J Joseph; M K Chandrasekhara
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.967

4.  Circumcision without tears.

Authors:  J Tolkin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-09-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Urinary tract infections in children younger than 5 years of age: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, outcomes and prevention.

Authors:  T A Schlager
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 3.022

Review 6.  Male circumcision and prostate cancer: A geographical analysis, meta-analysis, and cost analysis.

Authors:  Robert S Van Howe
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Male circumcision.

Authors:  M Jones
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1994-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Circumcised hypospadias.

Authors:  Rafael V Pieretti; Alberto Pieretti; Rafael Pieretti-Vanmarcke
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2008-10-11       Impact factor: 1.827

9.  Update on male circumcision: prevention success and challenges ahead.

Authors:  Kristine E Johnson; Thomas C Quinn
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.725

10.  Bleeding complications after ritual circumcision: about six children.

Authors:  Nathalie Bocquet; Hélène Chappuy; Stephen Lortat-Jacob; Gérard Chéron
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2009-07-09       Impact factor: 3.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.