| Literature DB >> 29529933 |
Rachel Bingley1, Alan Martin2, Olivia Manfredi2, Mahdiyar Nejadhamzeeigilani1, Abimbola Oladokun1, Andrew Robert Beadling1, Sohail Siddiqui1, James Anderson3, Jonathan Thompson3, Anne Neville1, Michael Bryant1.
Abstract
Interest in the degradation mechanisms at the modular tapers interfaces has been renewed due to increased reported cases of adverse reactions to metal debris and the appearance of wear and corrosion at the modular tapers interfaces at revision. Over the past two decades, a lot of research has been expended to understand the degradation mechanisms, with two primary implant loading procedures and orientations used consistently across the literature. ASTM F1875-98 is often used as a guide to understand and benchmark the tribocorrosion processes occurring within the modular tapers interface. This article presents a comparison of the two methods outlined in ASTM F1875-98 as well as a critique of the standard considering the current paradigm in pre-clinical assessment of modular tapers.Entities:
Keywords: ASTM F1875-98; CoCrMo; Fretting–corrosion; high-nitrogen stainless steel; modular tapers
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29529933 DOI: 10.1177/0954411918760958
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Inst Mech Eng H ISSN: 0954-4119 Impact factor: 1.617