Literature DB >> 29528464

Ranging behavior relates to welfare indicators pre- and post-range access in commercial free-range broilers.

Peta S Taylor1, Paul H Hemsworth1, Peter J Groves2, Sabine G Gebhardt-Henrich3, Jean-Loup Rault1.   

Abstract

Little is known about the effect of accessing an outdoor range on chicken welfare. We tracked individual ranging behavior of 538 mixed-sex Ross 308 chickens on a commercial farm across 4 flocks in winter and summer. Before range access, at 17 to 19 d of age, and post-range access, at 30 to 33 and 42 to 46 d of age in winter and summer flocks respectively, welfare indicators were measured on chickens (pre-range: winter N = 292; summer N = 280; post-range: winter N = 131; summer N = 140), including weight, gait score, dermatitis and plumage condition. Post-ranging autopsies were performed (winter: N = 170; summer: N = 60) to assess breast burn, leg health, and ascites. Fewer chickens accessed the range in winter flocks (32.5%) than summer flocks (82.1%). Few relationships between welfare and ranging were identified in winter, likely due to minimal ranging and the earlier age of post-ranging data collection compared to summer flocks. In summer flocks prior to range access, chickens that accessed the range weighed 4.9% less (P = 0.03) than chickens that did not access the range. Pre-ranging weight, gait score, and overall plumage cover predicted the amount of range use by ranging chickens in summer flocks (P < 0.01), but it explained less than 5% of the variation, suggesting other factors are associated with ranging behavior. In summer flocks post-range access, ranging chickens weighed 12.8% less than non-ranging chickens (P < 0.001). More range visits were associated with lower weight (P < 0.01), improved gait scores (P = 0.02), greater breast plumage cover (P = 0.02), lower ascites index (P = 0.01), and less pericardial fluid (P = 0.04). More time spent on the range was associated with lower weight (P < 0.01) and better gait scores (P < 0.01). These results suggest that accessing an outdoor range in summer is partly related to changes in broiler chicken welfare. Further investigations are required to determine causation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29528464     DOI: 10.3382/ps/pey060

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  6 in total

1.  Effects of Outdoor Access and Indoor Stocking Density on Behaviour and Stress in Broilers in the Subhumid Tropics.

Authors:  Rubi Sanchez-Casanova; Luis Sarmiento-Franco; Jose Segura-Correa; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 2.752

2.  Bird Health, Housing and Management Routines on Swedish Organic Broiler Chicken Farms.

Authors:  Lina Göransson; Jenny Yngvesson; Stefan Gunnarsson
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 2.752

3.  Environmental Complexity: Additional Human Visual Contact Reduced Meat Chickens' Fear of Humans and Physical Items Altered Pecking Behavior.

Authors:  Peta S Taylor; Paul H Hemsworth; Jean-Loup Rault
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 2.752

4.  The Effects of Providing Outdoor Access to Broilers in the Tropics on Their Behaviour and Stress Responses.

Authors:  Rubí E Sánchez-Casanova; Luis Sarmiento-Franco; Clive J C Phillips
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-27       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Free Dietary Choice and Free-Range Rearing Improve the Product Quality, Gait Score, and Microbial Richness of Chickens.

Authors:  Siyu Chen; Hai Xiang; Xu Zhu; Hui Zhang; Dan Wang; Huagui Liu; Jikun Wang; Tao Yin; Langqing Liu; Minghua Kong; Jian Zhang; Shin-Ichiro Ogura; Xingbo Zhao
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Associations between welfare and ranging profile in free-range commercial and heritage meat-purpose chickens (Gallus gallus domesticus).

Authors:  Joanna Marchewka; Patryk Sztandarski; Żaneta Zdanowska-Sąsiadek; Krzysztof Damaziak; Franciszek Wojciechowski; Anja B Riber; Stefan Gunnarsson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.