| Literature DB >> 29522441 |
Yan-Ling Zhu1, Ting Chen2, Jia-Li Xiong3, Di Wu4, Qian-Yun Xi5, Jun-Yi Luo6, Jia-Jie Sun7, Yong-Liang Zhang8.
Abstract
Adipose tissue plays an important role in energy metabolism. Adipose dysfunction is closely related to obesity and type II diabetes. Glucose uptake is the key step for fat synthesis in adipocyte. miRNAs have been proven to play a crucial role in adipocyte differentiation, adipogenesis and glucose homeostasis. In this paper, we firstly reported that miR-146b decreased glucose consumption by up-regulating miR-146b in a porcine primary adipocyte model, while the inhibitor of endogenous miR-146b rescued the reduction. Then, miR-146b was predicated to target IRS1 by bioinformatics analysis, and a dual-luciferase reporter assay validated this predication. Western blot analyses indicated both IRS1 and glucose transporter type 4 (GLUT4) were down-regulated by miR-146b overexpression. Our study demonstrated that miR-146b regulated glucose homeostasis in porcine primary pre-adipocyte by targeting IRS1, and provided new understandings on regulations of lipogenesis by miRNAs.Entities:
Keywords: GLUT4; IRS1; adipocyte; glucose consumption; miR-146b
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29522441 PMCID: PMC5877644 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The miR-146b expression levels with transfection of miRNA mimics and inhibitor. Note: miR-146b mimics/NC/inhibitor/iNC were transfected into pre-adipocytes, and cells were collected on day 8 post-induction. After transfection and day 8 post-induction with miR-146b mimics and inhibitor, the expression levels of miR-146b were measured by a qPCR-based method. miRNA mimics (A) and inhibitors (B) significantly increased and decreased miR-146b levels compared with NC and iNC control, respectively, in adipocytes (n = 6, ** p < 0.01).
Figure 2miR-146b inhibits the scavenging effects on glucose in porcine adipocytes. Note: Glucose consumption was determined after transfection of miR-146b mimics/NC or inhibitor/iNC. miR-146b mimics significantly reduced glucose clearance on day 4 (A); 6 (C) and 8 (E) respectively, while inhibitors exerted the opposite results (B,D,F). Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 6, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).
KEGG pathway analysis of candidates predicted by RNAhybrid software.
| Pathway Term | Genes | |
|---|---|---|
| Adipocytokine signaling pathway | 2.7 × 10−3 | |
| T cell receptor signaling pathway | 3.2 × 10−3 | |
| Phagosome | 3.8 × 10−3 | |
| Focal Adhesion | 4.8 × 10−2 | |
| Regulation of actin cytoskeleton | 1.8 × 10−2 | |
| Bacterial invasion of epithelial cells | 2.0 × 10−2 | |
| AMPK signaling pathway | 2.2 × 10−2 | |
| FoxO signaling pathway | 3.5 × 10−2 | |
| Neurotrophin Signaling Pathway | 7.7 × 10−2 |
Figure 3miR-146b repressed GLUT4 and IRS1 protein expression. (A) GLUT4 and IRS1protein was down-regulated after miR-146b transfection and this reduction was rescued by the miR-146b inhibitor; (B) Data are presented as mean ± SD (* p < 0.05, n = 6); (C) Plasma membrane (PM) proteins were extracted from the differentiated cells and miR-146b mimics reduced the GLUT4 protein expression of the PM.
Figure 4ssc-miR-146b not directly targets porcine GLUT4 by luciferase reporter assay. (A) Three 3′-UTR sequences containing normal, mutagenic, and deleted binding sites were inserted downstream of the luciferase reporter. Seven nucleotides of GLUT4 3′-UTR were mutated and deleted to disrupt the binding with miR-146b seed regions; (B) Schematic diagram showing dual-luciferase reporter constructs of pig GLUT4 3′-UTR with putative miR-146b binding site; (C) Constructed vectors were transfected into Hela cells with miR-146 mimics or NC. The luciferase assay results revealed no significant differences betweenmiR-146b mimics and NC transfected with vectors containing normal GLUT4 3′-UTR, mutant GLUT4 3′-UTR and the deletion (n = 8).
Figure 5Verification of ssc-miR-146 direct targets of porcine IRS1 by luciferase reporter assay. (A) Three 3′-UTR sequences containing normal, mutagenic, and deleted binding sites were inserted downstream of the luciferase reporter. Six nucleotides of IRS1 3′-UTR were mutated or deleted to disrupt the binding with miR-146b seed regions. (B) Schematic diagram showing dual-luciferase reporter constructs of porcine IRS1 3′-UTR with putative miR-146b binding site; (C) Constructed vectors were transfected into Hela cells with miR-146 mimics or NC. The luciferase assay results revealed significant differences between miR-146b mimic and NC groups transfected with vectors containing normal IRS1 3′UTR (n = 8, * p < 0.05).
Figure 6Conserved analysis of miR-146b and its target gene across species.(A) The bold letter showed that porcine miR-146b shared the same sequences of seed region with human miR-146b; (B) The bold pointed out that 3′UTR of human IRS1 mRNA is in accordance with ssc-miR-146b binding site.
Figure 7miR-146a-5p did not target IRS1 gene (A) miR-146a-5p is different from miR-146b at the 18th and the 21th base, and there is one more base at the end of miR-146a-5p. We therefore synthesized three mutants. For mut1, the 18th base A was replaced by G; for mut2, the 21th base C was replaced by U; for mut3, both the 18th and the 21th base were replaced according to the sequence the miR-146a-5p. (B) Western blot and gray-scale scanning analyses of IRS1 after transfection of miR-146a-5p mimics/NC/inhibitor/iNC (n = 4); (C) pmirGLO dual-luciferase reporter vectors analysis between miR-146a-5p and the 3′UTR sequences of IRS1 gene.
Figure 8Analysis of end base mutation changes of miR-146b targeting on IRS1 by luciferasereporter assay (n = 8, * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01).