Literature DB >> 29521818

Leveraging Data, the Next Big Advance for Quality Improvement in Colorectal Cancer.

George J Chang1.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29521818      PMCID： PMC5846127          DOI： 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN： 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


× No keyword cloud information.
  9 in total

Review 1.  What is the role for the circumferential margin in the modern treatment of rectal cancer?

Authors:  Iris D Nagtegaal; Phil Quirke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database 2017 Update on Outcomes and Quality.

Authors:  Christopher W Seder; Daniel P Raymond; Cameron D Wright; Henning A Gaissert; Andrew C Chang; Sydney Clinton; Susan Becker; Felix G Fernandez; Benjamin D Kozower
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Recurrence and survival after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

Authors:  R J Heald; R D Ryall
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  High Rate of Positive Circumferential Resection Margins Following Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Call to Action.

Authors:  Aaron S Rickles; David W Dietz; George J Chang; Steven D Wexner; Mariana E Berho; Feza H Remzi; Frederick L Greene; James W Fleshman; Maher A Abbas; Walter Peters; Katia Noyes; John R T Monson; Fergal J Fleming
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Risk-adjusted pathologic margin positivity rate as a quality indicator in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Nader N Massarweh; Chung-Yuan Hu; Y Nancy You; Brian K Bednarski; Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas; John M Skibber; Scott B Cantor; Janice N Cormier; Barry W Feig; George J Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-09-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Risk Factors Associated With Circumferential Resection Margin Positivity in Rectal Cancer: A Binational Registry Study.

Authors:  Satish K Warrier; Joseph Cherng Kong; Glen R Guerra; Timothy J Chittleborough; Arun Naik; Robert G Ramsay; A Craig Lynch; Alexander G Heriot
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.585

7.  Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  James Fleshman; Megan Branda; Daniel J Sargent; Anne Marie Boller; Virgilio George; Maher Abbas; Walter R Peters; Dipen Maun; George Chang; Alan Herline; Alessandro Fichera; Matthew Mutch; Steven Wexner; Mark Whiteford; John Marks; Elisa Birnbaum; David Margolin; David Larson; Peter Marcello; Mitchell Posner; Thomas Read; John Monson; Sherry M Wren; Peter W T Pisters; Heidi Nelson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrew R L Stevenson; Michael J Solomon; John W Lumley; Peter Hewett; Andrew D Clouston; Val J Gebski; Lucy Davies; Kate Wilson; Wendy Hague; John Simes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Impact of clinical registries on quality of patient care and clinical outcomes: A systematic review.

Authors:  Dewan Md Emdadul Hoque; Varuni Kumari; Masuma Hoque; Rasa Ruseckaite; Lorena Romero; Sue M Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240
  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Regional and National Database Comparison of Colorectal Outcomes.

Authors:  Farwa Batool; Stacey D Collins; Jeremy Albright; Jane Ferraro; Juan Wu; Greta L Krapohl; Darrell A Campbell; Robert K Cleary
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.