Neil M Carleton1, Guangjing Zhu2, Mikhail Gorbounov3, M Craig Miller4, Kenneth J Pienta2,5,6, Linda M S Resar3,5,7, Robert W Veltri2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. 2. Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Statistical Consultant, Quakertown, Pennsylvania. 5. Department of Oncology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Department of Pharmacology and Molecular Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland. 7. Department of Pathology, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There are few tissue-based biomarkers that can accurately predict prostate cancer (PCa) progression and aggressiveness. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of prostate and breast overexpressed 1 (PBOV1) as a potential PCa biomarker. METHODS: Patient tumor samples were designated by Grade Groups using the 2014 Gleason grading system. Primary radical prostatectomy tumors were obtained from 48 patients and evaluated for PBOV1 levels using Western blot analysis in matched cancer and benign cancer-adjacent regions. Immunohistochemical evaluation of PBOV1 was subsequently performed in 80 cancer and 80 benign cancer-adjacent patient samples across two tissue microarrays (TMAs) to verify protein levels in epithelial tissue and to assess correlation between PBOV1 proteins and nuclear architectural changes in PCa cells. Digital histomorphometric analysis was used to track 22 parameters that characterized nuclear changes in PBOV1-stained cells. Using a training and test set for validation, multivariate logistic regression (MLR) models were used to identify significant nuclear parameters that distinguish Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa regions. RESULTS: PBOV1 protein levels were increased in tumors from Grade Group 3 and above (GS 4 + 3 and ≥ 8) regions versus Grade Groups 1 and 2 (GS 3 + 3 and 3 + 4) regions (P = 0.005) as assessed by densitometry of immunoblots. Additionally, by immunoblotting, PBOV1 protein levels differed significantly between Grade Group 2 (GS 3 + 4) and Grade Group 3 (GS 4 + 3) PCa samples (P = 0.028). In the immunohistochemical analysis, measures of PBOV1 staining intensity strongly correlated with nuclear alterations in cancer cells. An MLR model retaining eight parameters describing PBOV1 staining intensity and nuclear architecture discriminated Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa and benign cancer-adjacent regions with a ROC-AUC of 0.90 and 0.80, respectively, in training and test sets. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the PBOV1 protein could be used to discriminate Grade Group 3 and above PCa. Additionally, the PBOV1 protein could be involved in modulating changes to the nuclear architecture of PCa cells. Confirmatory studies are warranted in an independent population for further validation.
BACKGROUND: There are few tissue-based biomarkers that can accurately predict prostate cancer (PCa) progression and aggressiveness. We sought to evaluate the clinical utility of prostate and breast overexpressed 1 (PBOV1) as a potential PCa biomarker. METHODS:Patienttumor samples were designated by Grade Groups using the 2014 Gleason grading system. Primary radical prostatectomy tumors were obtained from 48 patients and evaluated for PBOV1 levels using Western blot analysis in matched cancer and benign cancer-adjacent regions. Immunohistochemical evaluation of PBOV1 was subsequently performed in 80 cancer and 80 benign cancer-adjacent patient samples across two tissue microarrays (TMAs) to verify protein levels in epithelial tissue and to assess correlation between PBOV1 proteins and nuclear architectural changes in PCa cells. Digital histomorphometric analysis was used to track 22 parameters that characterized nuclear changes in PBOV1-stained cells. Using a training and test set for validation, multivariate logistic regression (MLR) models were used to identify significant nuclear parameters that distinguish Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa regions. RESULTS:PBOV1 protein levels were increased in tumors from Grade Group 3 and above (GS 4 + 3 and ≥ 8) regions versus Grade Groups 1 and 2 (GS 3 + 3 and 3 + 4) regions (P = 0.005) as assessed by densitometry of immunoblots. Additionally, by immunoblotting, PBOV1 protein levels differed significantly between Grade Group 2 (GS 3 + 4) and Grade Group 3 (GS 4 + 3) PCa samples (P = 0.028). In the immunohistochemical analysis, measures of PBOV1 staining intensity strongly correlated with nuclear alterations in cancer cells. An MLR model retaining eight parameters describing PBOV1 staining intensity and nuclear architecture discriminated Grade Group 3 and above PCa from Grade Group 1 and 2 PCa and benign cancer-adjacent regions with a ROC-AUC of 0.90 and 0.80, respectively, in training and test sets. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that the PBOV1 protein could be used to discriminate Grade Group 3 and above PCa. Additionally, the PBOV1 protein could be involved in modulating changes to the nuclear architecture of PCa cells. Confirmatory studies are warranted in an independent population for further validation.
Authors: Anders Ullén; Lena Lennartsson; Ulrika Harmenberg; Bo Lennernäs; Khairul Majumder; Anders R Holmberg; Sten Nilsson; Göran P Elmberger Journal: Acta Oncol Date: 2005 Impact factor: 4.089
Authors: Robert W Veltri; Masood A Khan; Cameron Marlow; M Craig Miller; Stephen D Mikolajczyk; Munekado Kojima; Alan W Partin; Leonard S Marks Journal: Urology Date: 2006-10 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Sumit Isharwal; Michael C Miller; Cameron Marlow; Danil V Makarov; Alan W Partin; Robert W Veltri Journal: Prostate Date: 2008-07-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Jonathan L Wright; Claudia A Salinas; Daniel W Lin; Suzanne Kolb; Joseph Koopmeiners; Ziding Feng; Janet L Stanford Journal: J Urol Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jennifer R Stark; Sven Perner; Meir J Stampfer; Jennifer A Sinnott; Stephen Finn; Anna S Eisenstein; Jing Ma; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Tobias Kurth; Massimo Loda; Edward L Giovannucci; Mark A Rubin; Lorelei A Mucci Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-05-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Danil V Makarov; Cameron Marlow; Jonathan I Epstein; M Craig Miller; Patricia Landis; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter; Robert W Veltri Journal: Prostate Date: 2008-02-01 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Neil M Carleton; Guangjing Zhu; M Craig Miller; Christine Davis; Prakash Kulkarni; Robert W Veltri Journal: Cancer Rep (Hoboken) Date: 2020-01-29
Authors: Mikhail Gorbounov; Neil M Carleton; Rebecca J Asch-Kendrick; Lingling Xian; Lisa Rooper; Lionel Chia; Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Leslie Cope; Alan Meeker; Vered Stearns; Robert W Veltri; Young Kyung Bae; Linda M S Resar Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2019-09-17 Impact factor: 4.624
Authors: Gilberto Ruiz-Deya; Jaime Matta; Jarline Encarnación-Medina; Carmen Ortiz-Sanchéz; Julie Dutil; Ryan Putney; Anders Berglund; Jasreman Dhillon; Youngchul Kim; Jong Y Park Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-01-13 Impact factor: 5.923