| Literature DB >> 29520356 |
Camilla Calabrese1, Assimo Maris1, Luca Evangelisti1, Anna Piras1, Valentina Parravicini1, Sonia Melandri1.
Abstract
We describe an experimental and quantum chemical study for the accurate determination of the conformational space of small molecular systems governed by intramolecular non-covalent interactions. The model systems investigated belong to the biological relevant aminoalcohol's family, and include 2-amino-1-phenylethanol, 2-methylamino-1-phenylethanol, noradrenaline, adrenaline 2-aminoethanol, and N-methyl-2-aminoethanol. For the latter molecule, the rotational spectrum in the 6-18 and 59.6-74.4 GHz ranges was recorded in the isolated conditions of a free jet expansion. Based on the analysis of the rotational spectra, two different conformational species and 11 isotopologues were observed and their spectroscopic constants, including 14N-nuclear hyperfine coupling constants and methyl internal rotation barriers, were determined. From the experimental data a structural determination was performed, which was also used to benchmark accurate quantum chemical calculations on the whole conformational space. Atom in molecules and non-covalent interactions theories allowed the characterization of the position of the intramolecular non-covalent interactions and the energies involved, highlighting the subtle balance responsible of the stabilization of all the molecular systems.Entities:
Keywords: 1,2-aminoalcohols; N-methyl-2-aminoethanol; adrenergic neurotransmitters; atom in molecules theory; hydrogen bond; molecular structure; quantum chemical calculations; rotational spectroscopy
Year: 2018 PMID: 29520356 PMCID: PMC5827360 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2018.00025
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.221
Figure 1Sketch of 1,2-aminoalcohols (Y = H, CH3; X = H, phenyl, catechol) and significant dihedral angles describing the conformational space.
Figure 2Hydroxyl internal rotation pathways of G'T-MAE and GG-MAE.
Figure 3Theoretical shapes, electronic relative energies values (kJ mol−1), and HB distances (Å) for the most stable conformers of MAE. First and second values refer to B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) and MP2/6-311++G(d,p) results, respectively.
Calculated [basis set 6-311++G(d,p)], rotational constants (A, B, C), quartic centrifugal distortion constants (DJ, DJK, DK, d1, d2), potential barrier for the methyl internal rotation (V3) dipole moment components in the principal axes system (μa, μb, μc), and nuclear quadrupole coupling constants related to the 14N nucleus (χ, χ, χcc) of gG'T and g'GG-MAE.
| 11917 | 11955 | 9295 | 9202 | |
| 2652 | 2691 | 3004 | 3090 | |
| 2394 | 2431 | 2807 | 2890 | |
| 1.2 | 1.17 | 3.40 | 4.07 | |
| −7.0 | −8.43 | −21.80 | −27.07 | |
| 66.0 | 68.25 | 68.70 | 78.44 | |
| −0.23 | −0.22 | −0.66 | −0.80 | |
| −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.01 | −0.02 | |
| 11.8 | 12.7 | 9.8 | 10.7 | |
| 2.48 | 2.53 | −2.80 | −2.86 | |
| 1.46 | 1.60 | 1.34 | 1.44 | |
| 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.09 | 0.23 | |
| 3.00 | 3.11 | 3.11 | 3.21 | |
| 1.62 | 1.49 | 0.56 | 0.53 | |
| −3.86 | −3.57 | −2.75 | −2.32 | |
| 2.25 | 2.08 | 2.19 | 1.80 | |
| Δ | 0 | 0 | 1.22 | 0.46 |
| Δ | 0 | 0 | 1.32 | 0.65 |
Absolute energy value: −249.778776 Hartrees.
Absolute energy value: −249.055610 Hartrees.
Absolute energy value: −249.652558 Hartrees.
Absolute energy value: −248.926849 Hartrees.
Figure 4Recorded transitions of MAE showing the splitting of the rotational transitions due to the 14N nuclear quadrupole coupling (F quantum number) and the methyl group internal rotation (A/E).
Experimental rotational constants (A, B, C), quartic centrifugal distortion constants (DJ, DJK, DK, d1, d2), potential barrier (V3), and structural parameters (F0, δ, ε) for the methyl internal rotation and the nuclear quadrupole coupling constants related to the 14N nucleus (χ, χ, χcc) of gG'T-MAE and g'GG-MAE.
| 12123.7430(6) | 9155.314(2) | |
| 2653.8058(2) | 3076.3199(5) | |
| 2400.7362(2) | 2868.6381(4) | |
| 1.1589(7) | 4.341(4) | |
| −8.389(6) | −28.83(2) | |
| 70.88(8) | 84.10(7) | |
| −0.2207(5) | −0.927(3) | |
| −0.0107(5) | −0.001(2) | |
| 1.578(2) | 0.510(7) | |
| −5.262(3) | −3.81(1) | |
| 11.91(8) | 9.7(1) | |
| 157.09638 | 157.24301 | |
| 2.7598 | 0.8741 | |
| 1.4853 | −1.1993 | |
| σ | 0.006 | 0.02 |
| 206 | 202 |
Error in parentheses in units of the last digit.
Fixed to the MP2/6-311++G(d,p) calculated value.
Root-mean-square deviation of the fit.
Number of lines in the fit.
Figure 5Structures of the observed two most stable conformers of MAE. Larger circles are from the B3LYP/6-311++G(d,p) optimizations, small circles represent the position of the substituted atoms in the rs structure. HB parameters from r0 structure.
Figure 6The NCI plots and AIM binding energies (OH···N HB in kJ mol−1) for the studied molecules. Blue and green colors identify the presence of strong and weak attractive interactions, respectively. Red color indicates repulsive interaction.
Figure 7Adrenaline (upper part) and noradrenaline (lower part) shapes in the receptor as deduced from the Protein Data Bank files.