Literature DB >> 29519760

Emergency medical technician-performed point-of-care blood analysis using the capillary blood obtained from skin puncture.

Changsun Kim1, Hansol Kim2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Comparing a point-of-care (POC) test using the capillary blood obtained from skin puncture with conventional laboratory tests.
METHODS: In this study, which was conducted at the emergency department of a tertiary care hospital in April-July 2017, 232 patients were enrolled, and three types of blood samples (capillary blood from skin puncture, arterial and venous blood from blood vessel puncture) were simultaneously collected. Each blood sample was analyzed using a POC analyzer (epoc® system, USA), an arterial blood gas analyzer (pHOx®Ultra, Nova biomedical, USA) and venous blood analyzers (AU5800, DxH2401, Beckman Coulter, USA). Twelve parameters were compared between the epoc and reference analyzers, with an equivalence test, Bland-Altman plot analysis and linear regression employed to show the agreement or correlation between the two methods.
RESULTS: The pH, HCO3, Ca2+, Na+, K+, Cl-, glucose, Hb and Hct measured by the epoc were equivalent to the reference values (95% confidence interval of mean difference within the range of the agreement target) with clinically inconsequential mean differences and narrow limits of agreement. All of them, except pH, had clinically acceptable agreements between the two methods (results within target value ≥80%). Of the remaining three parameters (pCO2, pO2 and lactate), the epoc pCO2 and lactate values were highly correlated with the reference device values, whereas pO2 was not. (pCO2: R2=0.824, y=-1.411+0.877·x; lactate: R2=0.902, y=-0.544+0.966·x; pO2: R2=0.037, y=61.6+0.431·x).
CONCLUSION: Most parameters, except only pO2, measured by the epoc were equivalent to or correlated with those from the reference method.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Capillary blood; Emergency medical services; Point-of-care systems

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29519760     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  3 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and management of metabolic acidosis: guidelines from a French expert panel.

Authors:  Boris Jung; Mikaël Martinez; Yann-Erick Claessens; Michaël Darmon; Kada Klouche; Alexandre Lautrette; Jacques Levraut; Eric Maury; Mathieu Oberlin; Nicolas Terzi; Damien Viglino; Youri Yordanov; Pierre-Géraud Claret; Naïke Bigé
Journal:  Ann Intensive Care       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 6.925

2.  Validation of a Portable Blood Gas Analyzer for Use in Challenging Field Conditions at High Altitude.

Authors:  Janek Nawrocki; Michael Furian; Aline Buergin; Laura Mayer; Simon Schneider; Maamed Mademilov; Madeleine S Bloch; Talant M Sooronbaev; Silvia Ulrich; Konrad E Bloch
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Performance evaluation of all analytes on the epoc® Blood Analysis System for use in hospital surgical and intensive care units.

Authors:  Zahraa Mohammed-Ali; Sousan Bagherpoor; Pauline Diker; Thuy Hoang; Ivana Vidovic; Christine Cursio; Felix Leung; Davor Brinc
Journal:  Pract Lab Med       Date:  2020-11-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.