| Literature DB >> 29518984 |
Roshan Kumar Mahat1, Neelima Singh2, Akshara Gupta3, Vedika Rathore4.
Abstract
Prediabetes is considered as a risk factor for the development of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease. The present study was conducted with the aim of finding out the relationship between oxidative DNA damage and carotid intima media thickness for the prediction of cardiovascular disease in prediabetic subjects. The study included 100 prediabetic subjects and 100 normal individuals as controls. In both cases and controls, 8-OHdG was measured by ELISA, and CIMT was measured by B mode ultrasonography. Both 8-OHdG and CIMT were significantly higher in subjects with prediabetes as compared to controls (185.80 ± 10.72 pg/mL vs. 126.13 ± 16.01 pg/mL, p < 0.001 and 0.70 ± 0.04 mm vs. 0.57 ± 0.03 mm, p < 0.001, respectively). There was significant and positive correlation of IGT with 8-OHdG (r = 0.783; p < 0.001) and CIMT (r = 0.787; p < 0.001) in prediabetic subjects. Moreover, 8-OHdG showed significant positive correlation with CIMT (r = 0.704; p < 0.001) in prediabetic subjects. In conclusion, increased 8-OHdG and CIMT in prediabetic subjects indicate that biochemical changes of atherosclerosis start even before the onset of diabetes mellitus. Hence, 8-OHdG and CIMT could be used as indicators of cardiovascular disease risk in these subjects.Entities:
Keywords: 8-hydroxy-2-deoxy-guanosine; cardiovascular disease; carotid intima media thickness; prediabetes
Year: 2018 PMID: 29518984 PMCID: PMC5872363 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd5010015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cardiovasc Dev Dis ISSN: 2308-3425
Demographic data of control and prediabetic subjects.
| Variables | Control Subjects ( | Prediabetic Subjects ( |
|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 38.92 ± 7.85 | 39.43 ± 8.90 NS |
| Sex (M/F) | 55/45 | 51/49 NS |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.48 ± 1.05 | 29.07 ± 1.71 ** |
| WC (cm) | 82.5 ± 2.84 | 92.02 ± 3.95 ** |
| HC (cm) | 94.85 ± 2.35 | 95.96 ± 2.66 * |
| WHR | 0.87 ± 0.03 | 0.96 ± 0.03 ** |
| SBP (mmHg) | 116.34 ± 2.94 | 127.50 ± 5.65 ** |
| DBP (mmHg) | 76.50 ± 2.71 | 81.36 ± 3.60 ** |
Results are shown as mean ± SD; BMI: Body mass index; WC: Waist circumference; HC: Hip circumference; WHR: Waist to hip ratio; SBP: Systolic blood pressure; DBP: Diastolic blood pressure; NS Non significant; * Significant at p < 0.01; ** Significant at p < 0.001.
Biochemical parameters and carotid intima media thickness of studied subjects.
| Variables | Control Subjects ( | Prediabetic Subjects ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blood glucose (mg/dL) | Fasting | 90.13 ± 3.84 | 115.88 ± 3.48 ** |
| 2-h PG | 124.72 ± 6.23 | 148.20 ± 3.66 ** | |
| HbA1c (%) | 4.81 ± 0.14 | 5.81 ± 0.12 ** | |
| 8-OHdG (pg/mL) | 126.13 ± 16.01 | 185.80 ± 10.72 ** | |
| CIMT (mm) | 0.57 ± 0.03 | 0.70 ± 0.04 ** | |
Results are shown as mean ± SD; HbA1c: Glycated hemoglobin; 8-OHdG: 8-hydroxy-2-deoxy guanosine; 2-h PG: 2 h post glucose after giving 75 gm of glucose during OGTT. ** Significant at p < 0.001.
Showing correlation analysis between IGT, 8-OHdG, and CIMT in prediabetic subjects.
| Parameters | IGT | 8-OHdG | CIMT |
|---|---|---|---|
| IGT | 1 | 0.783 ** | 0.787 ** |
| 8-OHdG | 0.783 ** | 1 | 0.704 ** |
| CIMT | 0.787 ** | 0.704 ** | 1 |
** Significant at p < 0.001; IGT: Impaired glucose tolerance; 8-OHdG: 8-hydroxy-2-deoxy guanosine; CIMT: carotid intima media thickness.
Showing correlation analysis of 8-OHdG and CIMT with age, and BMI and WHR in prediabetic subjects.
| Variables | 8-OHdG | CIMT |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 0.486 ** | 0.469 ** |
| BMI | 0.450 ** | 0.344 ** |
| WHR | 0.368 ** | 0.241 * |
* Significant at p < 0.05, ** Significant at p < 0.001; IGT: Impaired glucose tolerance; 8-OHdG: 8-hydroxy-2-deoxy guanosine; CIMT: carotid intima media thickness; BMI: Body mass index; WHR: Waist to hip ratio.
Figure 1Showing comparison of 8-OHdG between prediabetic and control subjects (data presented as mean ± SD).
Figure 2Showing changes in CIMT due to impaired glucose tolerance in prediabetic subjects (data presented as mean ± SD).
Figure 3Showing correlation of IGT with 8-OHdG in prediabetic subjects (r = 0.783; p < 0.001).
Figure 4Showing correlation of IGT with CIMT in prediabetic subjects (r = 0.787; p < 0.001).
Figure 5Showing correlation between 8-OHdG and CIMT in prediabetic subjects (r = 0.704; p < 0.001).