| Literature DB >> 29518940 |
Yi-An Chang1,2, Shun-Long Weng3,4,5, Shun-Fa Yang6,7, Chih-Hung Chou8,9, Wei-Chih Huang10,11, Siang-Jyun Tu12, Tzu-Hao Chang13, Chien-Ning Huang14,15, Yuh-Jyh Jong16,17,18, Hsien-Da Huang19,20.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is often diagnosed at a late stage and may be malignantly transformed from oral leukoplakia (OL). This study aimed to identify potential plasma microRNAs (miRNAs) for the early detection of oral cancer. Plasma from normal, OL, and OSCC patients were evaluated. Small RNA sequencing was used to screen the differently expressed miRNAs among the groups. Next, these miRNAs were validated with individual samples by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays in the training phase (n = 72) and validation phase (n = 178). The possible physiological roles of the identified miRNAs were further investigated using bioinformatics analysis. Three miRNAs (miR-222-3p, miR-150-5p, and miR-423-5p) were identified as differentially expressed among groups; miR-222-3p and miR-423-5p negatively correlated with T stage, lymph node metastasis status, and clinical stage. A high diagnostic accuracy (Area under curve = 0.88) was demonstrated for discriminating OL from OSCC. Bioinformatics analysis reveals that miR-423-5p and miR-222-3p are significantly over-expressed in oral cancer tissues and involved in various cancer pathways. The three-plasma miRNA panel may be useful to monitor malignant progression from OL to OSCC and as potential biomarkers for early detection of oral cancer.Entities:
Keywords: biomarker; early diagnosis; leukoplakia; miRNA; oral cancer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29518940 PMCID: PMC5877619 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19030758
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Clinical characteristics of study subjects.
| Screening and Training Phase ( | Validation Phase ( | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | Normal (%) | OL (%) | OSCC (%) | Normal (%) | OL (%) | OSCC (%) |
| Number | 20 | 20 | 32 | 50 | 46 | 82 |
| Age (mean ± SD) | 52.05 ± 12.78 | 52.20 ± 12.53 | 52.20 ± 9.03 | 52.86 ± 14.06 | 48.35 ± 12.11 | 53.79 ± 11.25 |
| Sex | ||||||
| Male | 20 (100.0) | 18 (90.0) | 31 (96.8) | 48 (96.0) | 44 (95.6) | 80 (97.5) |
| Female | 0 (0.0) | 2 (10.0) | 1 (3.2) | 2 (4.0) | 2 (4.4) | 2 (2.5) |
| Smoking | ||||||
| Non-smoker | 4 (20.0) | 6 (30.0) | 1 (3.2) | 2 (4.0) | 6 (13.0) | 7 (8.5) |
| Former smoker | 9 (45.0) | 11 (55.0) | 12 (37.5) | 15 (30.0) | 12 (26.1) | 16 (19.5) |
| Current smoker | 7 (35.0) | 3 (15.0) | 19 (59.3) | 33 (66.0) | 28 (60.9) | 59 (72.0) |
| BQ chewing | ||||||
| Non-BQ | 11 (55.0) | 6 (30.0) | 3 (9.4) | 27 (54.0) | 12 (26.1) | 7 (8.5) |
| Former BQ chewing | 6 (30.0) | 10 (50.0) | 25 (78.1) | 15 (30.0) | 28 (60.9) | 63 (76.8) |
| Current BQ-chewing | 3 (15.0) | 4 (20.0) | 4 (12.5) | 8 (16.0) | 6 (13.0) | 12 (14.7) |
| Alcohol consumption | ||||||
| Non-drinker | 5 (25.0) | 9 (45.0) | 11 (34.4) | 20 (40.0) | 20 (43.5) | 22 (26.8) |
| Former drinker | 10 (50.0) | 9 (45.0) | 13 (40.6) | 22 (44.0) | 23 (50.0) | 36 (43.9) |
| Current drinker | 5 (25.0) | 2 (10.0) | 8 (25.0) | 8 (16.0) | 3 (6.5) | 24 (29.3) |
| Stage | ||||||
| I | 14 (43.8) | 32 (39.0) | ||||
| II | 0 (0.0) | 15 (18.3) | ||||
| III | 0 (0.0) | 11 (13.4) | ||||
| IV | 18 (56.2) | 24 (29.3) | ||||
| T stage | ||||||
| T1 | 14 (43.8) | 33 (40.2) | ||||
| T2 | 3 (9.4) | 24 (29.3) | ||||
| T3 | 0 (0.0) | 4 (4.9) | ||||
| T4 | 15 (46.8) | 21 (25.6) | ||||
| N stage | ||||||
| N0 | 19 (59.4) | 60 (73.2) | ||||
| N1 | 5 (15.6) | 11 (13.4) | ||||
| N2 | 8 (25.0) | 11 (13.4) | ||||
Abbreviations: OL = oral leukoplakia; OSCC = oral squamous cell carcinoma; BQ = betel quid; SD = standard deviation.
Figure 1Study design. Abbreviations: RPM = reads per million; qRT-PCR = quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction; ROC = receiver operating characteristics.
Figure 2Quality of small RNA sequencing data. (A) Read length distribution indicates that all the samples with a peak in read length 21–23 of miRNA length. (B) More than 95% reads were mapped to reference genome. (C) More than 44% of mapped reads were miRNAs.
Figure 3miRNA profiling by small RNA sequencing. (A) Each point indicates the expression difference of a single miRNA between specified groups. The dotted line represents the cut-off value of expression difference and expression level while the solid line indicates no discrepant expression among groups. (B) Fourteen deregulated miRNAs. The miRNA expression level (log2 transformed RPM value) is presented. The color legend from red to white means the expression value from 6 to 14, and the light blue line presents a histogram of the expression value.
Figure 4Expression of candidate miRNA in different data sets. (A) Abundance of miR-let-7e-5p, miR-125a-5p, miR-100-5p, miR-150-5p, miR-222-3p, and miR-423-5p in plasma of subjects in training phase (n = 72). Expression of significant miRNA (miR-222-3p, miR-423-5p, and miR-150-5p) in plasma from validation phase (n = 178) (B) and from all subjects (n = 250) (C). Significance of two-sided p-values is indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001, and **** p < 0.001 (Mann–Whitney test).
Spearman correlation analysis.
| mir-222-3p | mir-423-5p | mir-150-5p | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | ρ | ρ | ρ | |||
| Age | 0.105 | NS | 0.037 | NS | −0.052 | NS |
| Gender | 0.039 | NS | 0.004 | NS | 0.103 | NS |
| Betel chewing status | −0.241 | 0.005 | −0.149 | NS | −0.099 | NS |
| Smoking status | −0.161 | NS | 0.034 | NS | 0.001 | NS |
| Alcohol status | −0.121 | NS | 0.086 | NS | −0.178 | NS |
| Clinical stage | −0.201 | 0.032 | −0.237 | 0.011 | −0.116 | NS |
| T stage | −0.220 | NS | −0.276 | 0.003 | −0.156 | NS |
| Lymph node metastasis | −0.222 | 0.018 | −0.220 | 0.019 | 0.012 | NS |
NS: Not significant.
Figure 5Expression of miR-222-3p, miR-423-5p, and miR-150-5p in different groups of patients. (A) OSCC patients (n = 114) were categorized according to clinical stage, lymph node metastasis status indicates the presence [N(+)] and absence [N(−)] of metastasis and T stage. (B) Normal and oral leukoplakia (OL) patients (n = 136) were classified by the habit of smoking and betel nut chewing. Current smokers were further divided into two groups according to the history of smoking. Significance of two-sided p-values is indicated as follows: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01 (Mann–Whitney test).
Regression analysis.
| Univariate | Mulitivariate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Relative Risk | Relative Risk | |||
| Model 1 | ||||
| OL | ||||
| miR-222-3p | 0.205 (0.123−0.344) | <0.001 | 0.212 (0.127−0.357) | <0.001 |
| miR-150-5p | 1.114 (1.027−1.210) | 0.010 | 1.124 (1.032−1.223) | 0.007 |
| miR-423-5p | 0.880 (0.673−1.150) | 0.349 | 0.897 (0.682−1.180) | 0.437 |
| miR panel a | 1.348 (1.233−1.474) | <0.001 | 1.361 (1.238−1.496) | <0.001 |
| OSCC | ||||
| miR-222-3p | 1.038 (0.858−1.256) | 0.699 | 1.114 (0.898−1.383) | 0.324 |
| miR-150-5p | 1.189 (1.083−1.306) | <0.001 | 1.198 (1.079−1.330) | 0.001 |
| miR-423-5p | 1.466 (1.182−1.817) | <0.001 | 1.599 (1.238−2.066) | <0.001 |
| miR panel b | 1.377 (1.198−1.584) | <0.001 | 1.386 (1.189−1.615) | <0.001 |
| Model 2 | ||||
| OSCC | ||||
| miR-222-3p | 2.915 (2.087−4.072) | <0.001 | 3.014 (2.102−4.321) | <0.001 |
| miR-150-5p | 1.038 (1.003−1.075) | 0.035 | 1.048 (1.007−1.091) | 0.020 |
| miR-423-5p | 1.581 (1.238−2.021) | <0.001 | 1.601 (1.236−2.075) | <0.001 |
| miR panel c | 1.455 (1.308−1.617) | <0.001 | 1.448 (1.292−1.623) | <0.001 |
The reference category was normal and OL patients in mode 1 and model 2, respectively. a miR222-3p and miR-150-5p; b miR-150-5p and miR-423-5p; c miR-222-3p, miR-150-5p, and miR-423-5p.
Figure 6ROC analysis for individual miRNA and combined panel. ROC curve was generated by analyzing samples from all patients. The combined panels were generated by linear combination of values of each miRNA. AUC = area under the ROC curve. p-Values were calculated using Mann–Whitney test.
The top 10 most enriched KEGG pathway with the targetome of three miRNAs.
| Term | No. of Genes | Fold Enrichment | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wnt signaling pathway | 16 | 4.69 × 10−6 | 4.22 |
| Pathways in cancer | 26 | 6.07 × 10−5 | 2.41 |
| Hepatitis B | 14 | 1.55 × 10−4 | 3.51 |
| Axon guidance | 13 | 1.70 × 10−4 | 3.72 |
| Sphingolipid signaling pathway | 11 | 1.58 × 10−3 | 3.33 |
| HTLV-I infection | 17 | 1.66 × 10−3 | 2.42 |
| PI3K-Akt signaling pathway | 20 | 2.71 × 10−3 | 2.11 |
| Proteoglycans in cancer | 14 | 3.19 × 10−3 | 2.55 |
| FoxO signaling pathway | 11 | 3.57 × 10−3 | 2.99 |
| Rap1 signaling pathway | 14 | 4.79 × 10−3 | 2.42 |
| MicroRNAs in cancer | 17 | 4.84 × 10−3 | 2.17 |
KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes.