BACKGROUND: The ideal management of common bile duct (CBD) stones remains controversial, whether with single-stage management using laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or with 2-stage management using preoperative or postoperative ERCP. We wished to elucidate the practice patterns within our health system, which includes both large urban referral centers and small rural critical access hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective data analysis from our 22-hospital, not-for-profit, integrated healthcare system. All patients with a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and either ERCP or LCBDE for duct clearance between 2008 and 2013 were included. Demographic data, along with disease-specific characteristics and outcomes, were collected and compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 37,301 patients underwent LC. Of these, 1,961 (5.3%) met inclusion criteria. Single-stage management with LC+LCBDE was performed in 28% of patients, and the remaining 72% underwent 2-stage management with ERCP (73% postoperative ERCP, 27% preoperative). Mean total number of procedures was lowest in the LC+LCBDE group vs the post-cholecystectomy ERCP group vs the preoperative ERCP group (mean 1.4 vs 2.1 vs 2.3; p < 0.05). Hospital charges were also lower in the LC+LCBDE group vs post-cholecystectomy ERCP vs preoperative ERCP groups ($9,000 vs $10,800 vs $14,200; p < 0.05). Single-stage vs two-stage management varied greatly between hospitals (from 0% to 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage management of CBD stones resulted in the fewest procedures and lower hospital charges without an increase in complications. Single-stage management (LC+LCBDE) of CBD stones is underused and can offer better value in today's cost-constrained environment.
BACKGROUND: The ideal management of common bile duct (CBD) stones remains controversial, whether with single-stage management using laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) during laparoscopic cholecystectomy, or with 2-stage management using preoperative or postoperative ERCP. We wished to elucidate the practice patterns within our health system, which includes both large urban referral centers and small rural critical access hospitals. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective data analysis from our 22-hospital, not-for-profit, integrated healthcare system. All patients with a diagnosis of choledocholithiasis who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and either ERCP or LCBDE for duct clearance between 2008 and 2013 were included. Demographic data, along with disease-specific characteristics and outcomes, were collected and compared. RESULTS: During the study period, 37,301 patients underwent LC. Of these, 1,961 (5.3%) met inclusion criteria. Single-stage management with LC+LCBDE was performed in 28% of patients, and the remaining 72% underwent 2-stage management with ERCP (73% postoperative ERCP, 27% preoperative). Mean total number of procedures was lowest in the LC+LCBDE group vs the post-cholecystectomy ERCP group vs the preoperative ERCP group (mean 1.4 vs 2.1 vs 2.3; p < 0.05). Hospital charges were also lower in the LC+LCBDE group vs post-cholecystectomy ERCP vs preoperative ERCP groups ($9,000 vs $10,800 vs $14,200; p < 0.05). Single-stage vs two-stage management varied greatly between hospitals (from 0% to 93%). CONCLUSIONS: Single-stage management of CBD stones resulted in the fewest procedures and lower hospital charges without an increase in complications. Single-stage management (LC+LCBDE) of CBD stones is underused and can offer better value in today's cost-constrained environment.
Authors: Rosa Jorba; Mihai C Pavel; Erik Llàcer-Millán; Laia Estalella; Mar Achalandabaso; Elisabet Julià-Verdaguer; Esther Nve; Erlinda D Padilla-Zegarra; Josep M Badia; Donal B O'Connor; Robert Memba Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 4.584