Cuinan Jiang1, Xiuhao Zhao1, Shi Cheng1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been verified to be an effective technique in treating choledocholithiasis, and T-tube insertion has been widely performed after LCBDE. With growing doubts regarding the effectiveness and safety of T-tube drainage (TTD), it has been suggested to replace such with primary duct closure (PDC). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of PDC compared with TTD after LCBDE. METHODS: The PubMed, Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were used to accomplish a systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials and pro-/retrospective cohort studies that compared PDC alone or PDC combined with biliary drainage stenting (PDC+BD) with TTD after LCBDE. A subgroup analysis was established to compare PDC+BD with TTD. RevMan 5.3 was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2552 patients from 26 studies were included. The pooled odds ratio supported PDC, which yielded lower postoperative overall morbidity and incidence of bile leak and bile peritonitis and shorter surgical time and postoperative hospital stay when compared with TTD. In the subgroup analysis, PDC+BD showed significantly better results in terms of postoperative overall morbidity, incidence of bile leak and bile peritonitis, surgical time, and postoperative hospital stay than did TTD. PDC and PDC+BD showed no difference in the incidence of recurrent stones and biliary stricture during the long-term follow-up period compared with TTD. CONCLUSION: PDC alone or PDC+BD is superior to TTD as a duct-closure method after LCBDE.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) has been verified to be an effective technique in treating choledocholithiasis, and T-tube insertion has been widely performed after LCBDE. With growing doubts regarding the effectiveness and safety of T-tube drainage (TTD), it has been suggested to replace such with primary duct closure (PDC). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of PDC compared with TTD after LCBDE. METHODS: The PubMed, Science Citation Index, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were used to accomplish a systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials and pro-/retrospective cohort studies that compared PDC alone or PDC combined with biliary drainage stenting (PDC+BD) with TTD after LCBDE. A subgroup analysis was established to compare PDC+BD with TTD. RevMan 5.3 was used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: A total of 2552 patients from 26 studies were included. The pooled odds ratio supported PDC, which yielded lower postoperative overall morbidity and incidence of bile leak and bile peritonitis and shorter surgical time and postoperative hospital stay when compared with TTD. In the subgroup analysis, PDC+BD showed significantly better results in terms of postoperative overall morbidity, incidence of bile leak and bile peritonitis, surgical time, and postoperative hospital stay than did TTD. PDC and PDC+BD showed no difference in the incidence of recurrent stones and biliary stricture during the long-term follow-up period compared with TTD. CONCLUSION: PDC alone or PDC+BD is superior to TTD as a duct-closure method after LCBDE.
Entities:
Keywords:
Biliary drainage; Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; Primary duct closure; T-tube drainage
Authors: D I Kim; M H Kim; S K Lee; D W Seo; W B Choi; S S Lee; H J Park; Y H Joo; K S Yoo; H J Kim; Y I Min; W B Chol Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2001-07 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: G Decker; F Borie; B Millat; J C Berthou; A Deleuze; F Drouard; F Guillon; J G Rodier; A Fingerhut Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2002-10-08 Impact factor: 4.584