Literature DB >> 29518262

The evolution of ontogenetic allometric trajectories in mammalian domestication.

Laura A B Wilson1.   

Abstract

Morphological divergence of domesticated as compared to wild forms must result from changes in the ontogenetic process. Species-specific tests for heterochrony have rejected a single explanation of domestic forms representing juveniles of their wild relatives. Ontogenetic allometric trajectories for 12 pairs of wild and domestic mammals were examined using skull growth data for 1070 specimens, including representatives from all lineages in which domestication has occurred. A suite of tests were performed to quantify allometric disparity in wild and domestic forms and assess the extent and patterning of modification to allometric trajectories. Domestication has modified postnatal ontogenetic allometric trajectories in mammals, and has generated disparity, achieved through lengthening of trajectory slopes and alteration to slope angles. Allometric disparity was similar for domestic forms compared to their wild relatives, whereas the magnitude of dispersion along allometric vectors differed between precocial mammals and altricial mammals, underscoring the importance of life history and shared evolutionary history in patterns of ontogenetic variation. The results verify the importance of scaling in the morphological changes associated with domestication. The response to domestication for all measured trajectory parameters was variable across species, suggesting multiple pathways of change.
© 2018 The Author(s). Evolution © 2018 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Allometric evolution; constraints; disparity; life history; ontogeny; postnatal growth

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29518262     DOI: 10.1111/evo.13464

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  9 in total

Review 1.  Detecting (non)parallel evolution in multidimensional spaces: angles, correlations and eigenanalysis.

Authors:  Junya Watanabe
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 3.703

2.  Climate and symbioses with ants modulate leaf/stem scaling in epiphytes.

Authors:  Guillaume Chomicki; Susanne S Renner
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Changes in ontogenetic patterns facilitate diversification in skull shape of Australian agamid lizards.

Authors:  Jaimi A Gray; Emma Sherratt; Mark N Hutchinson; Marc E H Jones
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Postcranial heterochrony, modularity, integration and disparity in the prenatal ossification in bats (Chiroptera).

Authors:  Camilo López-Aguirre; Suzanne J Hand; Daisuke Koyabu; Nguyen Truong Son; Laura A B Wilson
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 3.260

5.  Why the long face? Comparative shape analysis of miniature, pony, and other horse skulls reveals changes in ontogenetic growth.

Authors:  Laura Heck; Marcelo R Sanchez-Villagra; Madlen Stange
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 2.984

6.  The neural crest cell hypothesis: no unified explanation for domestication.

Authors:  Martin Johnsson; Rie Henriksen; Dominic Wright
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Shifts in growth, but not differentiation, foreshadow the formation of exaggerated forms under chicken domestication.

Authors:  Daniel Núñez-León; Gerardo A Cordero; Xenia Schlindwein; Per Jensen; Esther Stoeckli; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra; Ingmar Werneburg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 5.530

8.  Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?

Authors:  Madlen Stange; Daniel Núñez-León; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra; Per Jensen; Laura A B Wilson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

9.  The Australian dingo: untamed or feral?

Authors:  J William O Ballard; Laura A B Wilson
Journal:  Front Zool       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.172

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.