Literature DB >> 29517835

Consistency of Multiple Renal Functional MRI Measurements Over 18 Months.

Lu-Ping Li1,2, Jon Thacker3, Wei Li1,2, Huan Tan1, Chi Wang4, Orly Kohn5, Stuart Sprague2,6, Pottumarthi Prasad1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identification of patients with progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD) and those likely to respond to candidate therapeutics is urgently needed. Functional MRI measurements have shown promise. However, knowledge about the consistency of the measurements is essential to conduct longitudinal studies. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the consistency of repeated functional MRI measurements in healthy subjects. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, longitudinal study.
SUBJECTS: Seventeen healthy subjects were examined on two different occasions, 18 months apart. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Multiple gradient-recalled-echo, 2D navigator-gated flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery True-FISP and spin-echo planar diffusion-weighted sequences were used on a 3T scanner. Images were acquired on two different scanner configurations. ASSESSMENT: Blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) R2*, arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion-derived blood flow (BF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were analyzed using a custom image processing toolbox. Regions of interest (ROIs) were placed on renal cortex, medulla, and whole kidney. Multiple researchers were involved in defining the ROIs. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intra- and intersubject coefficients of variation (CV) and Bland-Altman plots were used to measure consistency and evaluate bias in the measurements. A nonparametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare differences between two timepoints.
RESULTS: The intrasubject CV for R2* and ADC were 6.8% and 5.3% with small (-3.8 and 5.3%) bias, respectively, comparing baseline and 18-month data. Intrasubject CV for renal cortex BF was higher (18.7%) compared to R2* and ADC, but comparable to prior literature values over shorter durations. It also exhibited a larger bias (-15.4%) between two timepoints and significantly lower values (P = 0.022) at 18-month data. DATA
CONCLUSION: All three MRI parameters over 18 months, even with a scanner upgrade and involving multiple observers, showed good consistency. These results are useful for the interpretation of longitudinal data and support the use of these methods to monitor progression in patients with CKD. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. MAGN. RESON. IMAGING 2018;48:514-521.
© 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  apparent diffusion coefficient; arterial spin labeling; blood oxygenation level dependent; chronic kidney disease; kidney

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29517835      PMCID: PMC6105537          DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  29 in total

1.  Quantitation of renal perfusion using arterial spin labeling with FAIR-UFLARE.

Authors:  N Karger; J Biederer; S Lüsse; J Grimm; J Steffens; M Heller; C Glüer
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  FAIR true-FISP perfusion imaging of the kidneys.

Authors:  Petros Martirosian; Uwe Klose; Irina Mader; Fritz Schick
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Diagnosis and assessment of renal fibrosis: the state of the art.

Authors:  Lena Berchtold; Iris Friedli; Jean-Paul Vallée; Solange Moll; Pierre-Yves Martin; Sophie de Seigneux
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2017-05-11       Impact factor: 2.193

4.  Measurement of arterial transit time and renal blood flow using pseudocontinuous ASL MRI with multiple post-labeling delays: Feasibility, reproducibility, and variation.

Authors:  Dong Won Kim; Woo Hyun Shim; Seong Kuk Yoon; Jong Yeong Oh; Jeong Kon Kim; Hoesu Jung; Tsuyoshi Matsuda; Dongeun Kim
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-01-16       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Sensitivity of arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI to pharmacologically induced perfusion changes in rat kidneys.

Authors:  Huan Tan; Jon Thacker; Tammy Franklin; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Renal Arterial Spin Labeling Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Anton S Becker; Cristina Rossi
Journal:  Nephron       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 2.847

7.  Arterial spin labeling MRI is able to detect early hemodynamic changes in diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  José María Mora-Gutiérrez; Nuria Garcia-Fernandez; M Fernanda Slon Roblero; Jose A Páramo; F Javier Escalada; Danny Jj Wang; Alberto Benito; María A Fernández-Seara
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Reproducibility of renal perfusion MR imaging in native and transplanted kidneys using non-contrast arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Nathan S Artz; Elizabeth A Sadowski; Andrew L Wentland; Arjang Djamali; Thomas M Grist; Songwon Seo; Sean B Fain
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Renal Blood Oxygenation Level-Dependent Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Sensitive and Objective Analysis.

Authors:  Jon M Thacker; Lu-Ping Li; Wei Li; Ying Zhou; Stuart M Sprague; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 6.016

10.  Renal perfusion imaging with two-dimensional navigator gated arterial spin labeling.

Authors:  Huan Tan; Ioannis Koktzoglou; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  2 in total

1.  Medullary Blood Oxygen Level-Dependent MRI Index (R2*) is Associated with Annual Loss of Kidney Function in Moderate CKD.

Authors:  Lu-Ping Li; Jon M Thacker; Wei Li; Bradley Hack; Chi Wang; Orly Kohn; Stuart M Sprague; Pottumarthi V Prasad
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2021-01-28       Impact factor: 3.754

2.  Multicenter Study Evaluating Intrarenal Oxygenation and Fibrosis Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Individuals With Advanced CKD.

Authors:  Pottumarthi V Prasad; Wei Li; Dominic S Raj; James Carr; Maria Carr; Jon Thacker; Lu-Ping Li; Chi Wang; Stuart M Sprague; Joachim H Ix; Michel Chonchol; Geoffrey Block; Alfred K Cheung; Kalani Raphael; Jennifer Gassman; Myles Wolf; Linda F Fried; Tamara Isakova
Journal:  Kidney Int Rep       Date:  2018-07-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.