Defects along wellbore interfaces constitute potential pathways for CO2 to leak from geological storage systems. In previous experimental work, we demonstrated that CO2-induced reaction over length-scales of several meters can lead to self-sealing of such defects. In the present work, we develop a reactive transport model that, on the one hand, enables μm-mm scale exploration of reactions along debonding defects and, on the other hand, allows simulation of the large, 6 m-long samples used in our experiments. At these lengths, we find that interplay between flow velocity and reaction rate strongly affects opening/sealing of interfacial defects, and depth of chemical alteration. Carbonate precipitation in initially open defects decreases flow rate, leading to a transition from advection-dominated to diffusion-dominated reactive transport, with acidic conditions becoming progressively more confined upstream. We investigate how reaction kinetics, portlandite content, and the nature of the carbonate products impact the extent of cement alteration and permeability reduction. Notably, we observe that nonuniformity of the initial defect geometry has a profound effect on the self-sealing behavior and permeability evolution as observed on the meter scale. We infer that future wellbore models need to consider the effects of such aperture variations to obtain reliable upscaling relations.
Defects along wellbore interfaces constitute potential pathways for CO2 to leak from geological storage systems. In previous experimental work, we demonstrated that CO2-induced reaction over length-scales of several meters can lead to self-sealing of such defects. In the present work, we develop a reactive transport model that, on the one hand, enables μm-mm scale exploration of reactions along debonding defects and, on the other hand, allows simulation of the large, 6 m-long samples used in our experiments. At these lengths, we find that interplay between flow velocity and reaction rate strongly affects opening/sealing of interfacial defects, and depth of chemical alteration. Carbonate precipitation in initially open defects decreases flow rate, leading to a transition from advection-dominated to diffusion-dominated reactive transport, with acidic conditions becoming progressively more confined upstream. We investigate how reaction kinetics, portlandite content, and the nature of the carbonate products impact the extent of cement alteration and permeability reduction. Notably, we observe that nonuniformity of the initial defect geometry has a profound effect on the self-sealing behavior and permeability evolution as observed on the meter scale. We infer that future wellbore models need to consider the effects of such aperture variations to obtain reliable upscaling relations.
Geological
storage can help reduce CO2 emissions.[1−3] However, for
successful sequestration, the injected CO2 should remain
confined to the intended storage volume.[4] Wellbores may provide unintended pathways for
CO2 to migrate into overlying aquifers or to the surface.[5−11] Conventional wellbore designs employ steel tubulars and cement seals
to prevent such leakage.[12] Unfortunately,
these artificial barriers often suffer from structural defects,[13] created by inadequate construction or abandonment[14−16] or sustained from the changes in temperature and stress-state endured
by the wellbore during operations.[17−20] Possible leakage pathways include
annular spaces along casing-cement and cement-rock interfaces and
fractures or damage zones in cement seals.[9] Understanding how the transport properties of such defects evolve
with the ingress of CO2-rich fluids is essential for a
confident assessment of wellbore and hence storage system integrity.[21]There exists a large body of experimental
work addressing the reactive
transport of CO2-rich aqueous fluids in simulated wellbore
defects.[22−38] The results obtained vary with experimental conditions, and examples
of self-limitation and self-enhancement of reactive flow have both
been documented.[39] In recent years, many
studies used reactive transport models to explain the different experimental
findings and explore unifying concepts.[26,40,41] It was shown that self-sealing efficiency depends
on factors such as residence time and the initial hydraulic aperture
of the debonding defect. While this provided key insight into understanding
laboratory scale behavior, most reactive-transport models, like most
experimental efforts, considered domains of only tens of centimeters.
Given the dimensions of real wellbores, involving tens to hundreds
of meters of cement, and considering the impact of long-range geochemical
gradients on self-limitation in reactive flow systems,[42,43] both the experimental and modeling work should be extended to much
longer length-scales.To help address this issue, we recently
reported lab experiments
exploring reactive transport of CO2-rich fluids along debonded
cement-casing interfaces over lengths of several meters.[44] Four flow-through experiments were performed,
at 60–80 °C and 10–15 MPa fluid pressure, on long
cement-filled steel tubes measuring 1–6 m in length and 6–8
mm in diameter, with hydraulically imposed debonding defects at their
steel-cement interfaces. Figure shows the key results from one of these experiments,
T60-1, with an initial apparent permeability (κapp) of ∼3.4 × 10–13 m2 (Figure a). Assuming a uniform,
circumferential defect, this value corresponds to an initial hydraulic
aperture (w0) of ∼18.3 μm.
After introduction of CO2-rich fluid at a constant pressure
difference of 0.6 MPa, the permeability decreased by 2 orders in the
first 60 h, during which ∼65 mL of CO2-rich was
injected (Figure b).
Subsequently, the pressure difference was increased to 1.8 MPa and
later to 4.8 MPa. Permeability gradually decreased further, reaching
∼2.9 × 10–17 m2 shortly prior
to experiment termination after 877 h. Length-resolved thermogravimetric
analysis (TGA) of the cement showed a decrease in portlandite content,
roughly mirrored by an increase in carbonate content, most pronounced
close to the inlet and observable up to ∼73 cm downstream (Figure c). Microscopy on
sample cross sections showed a CO2-induced reaction zonation
in the cement (Z1-Z5, Figure d; see SI, Section 1.1) and revealed
that the defect geometry was rather nonuniform, with the aperture
averaging ∼60 μm, but locally reaching up to ∼700
μm wide. The other three laboratory experiments showed similar
behavior, with decreases in permeability of 2–4 orders, associated
with carbonate precipitation in the defect apertures.[44]
Figure 1
Key results obtained in experiment T60-1 of Wolterbeek et al.,[44] showing apparent permeability (κapp) of the cement-filled steel tube sample versus a) time and b) injected
fluid volume, where ΔP denotes the pressure
difference applied across the sample. c) Profiles showing Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 composition of the sample. Compositional
change is defined here as the difference between measured composition
and that of unreacted reference cement. d) Typical cross-section through
the reacted sample, showing the defect aperture at the cement-steel
interface, and reaction zones (Z1-Z5) in the adjacent cement (SI, Section 1.1).
Key results obtained in experiment T60-1 of Wolterbeek et al.,[44] showing apparent permeability (κapp) of the cement-filled steel tube sample versus a) time and b) injected
fluid volume, where ΔP denotes the pressure
difference applied across the sample. c) Profiles showing Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 composition of the sample. Compositional
change is defined here as the difference between measured composition
and that of unreacted reference cement. d) Typical cross-section through
the reacted sample, showing the defect aperture at the cement-steel
interface, and reaction zones (Z1-Z5) in the adjacent cement (SI, Section 1.1).The main objective of the present study is to allow modeling
of
meter-scale sections of wellbore casing-cement interfaces, while still
including the relevant effects of local (μm-mm) scale reactive
transport processes. This is done by formulating the flow, transport,
and reaction processes in a 1D, cross-sectionally averaged, model
that uses effective rate terms. Using this model, we investigate how
6 m-long, complex-geometry wellbore defects evolve with the ingress
of CO2-rich fluid. Starting with a base model characterized
by a uniform debonding aperture, we first systematically vary a) the
reaction kinetics, b) initial portlandite content, and c) the porosity
and permeability of defect-filling precipitates, to explore the effect
of these imprecisely determined parameters. Subsequently, we investigate
the impact of defect geometry by including more complex, nonuniform
defects, marked by initial apertures that vary in the flow direction.
This geometrical aspect, which has not been explored in detail before,
is found to have a strong effect on self-sealing efficiency. Finally,
the modeling work is compared with our lab experiments,[44] illustrating how defect geometry may have had
a key contribution to the permeability evolution observed.
Modeling Approach
Processes Included
Various experimentally
observed
phenomena, such as carbonate precipitation,[22,25,34,38] chemical-mechanical
weakening of aperture-propping asperities,[28,45−47] creation and migration of fines,[33,48] and CO2-induced swelling-effects in the leached cement
matrix[22,23] may contribute to the self-sealing of defects.
Our model includes a multicomponent, mixed equilibrium/kinetic reaction
scheme to represent the geochemistry, allowing us to simulate the
dissolution–precipitation of cement phases and carbonates.
The simulations do not include chemical-mechanical effects, such as
the other three aforementioned sealing mechanisms, nor effects due
to changes in fluid pressure distribution.
Model Configuration
The cement-filled tube sample of
Wolterbeek et al.[44] that we will simulate
is 6 m long and has a diameter of 6 mm. For systems with such large
aspect ratios, the governing equations may be written using effective
parameters in the cross-sectional directions,[43] providing one-dimensional equations through the length of the sample.
In the numerical scheme, the sample is discretized into a series of
cylindrical segments (Figure a). Each segment, of length [m],
is initially characterized by two
radii, namely the inner radius of the steel tube (Rsteel [m]) and the radius of the cement core residing
inside (Rcement [m]). For this geometry,
the initial hydraulic aperture of the debonding defect at the steel-cement
interface, w[m], is given by w0 = Rsteel – Rcement (Figure a, 2b). The region r ≤ Rcement is occupied by cement,
consisting of both reactive and (relatively) inert phases. Unreacted
cement is assumed to be impermeable compared to the defect, i.e. κcement ≪ κapp, where κapp is the apparent permeability of the whole sample. The parameter fP0 [-] indicates the initial volume fraction of portlandite in the
cement. Accordingly, the initial volume of portlandite present in
each segment is VP0 = fP0πRcement2.
Figure 2
a) Schematic
illustration of the numerical scheme, discretizing
the sample into cylindrical segments. Domain consists of N = 1000 segments. Parts b-e) show radial chemical zonation and formation
of porous zones within the cement and inside the defect aperture.
Here, orange roughly corresponds to Z1, dark green corresponds to
Z2+Z3, and light green corresponds to carbonates formed outside of
the original cement matrix. b) Initial condition, before chemical
reaction; c) as portlandite dissolves, a porous zone forms in the
cement; d) porous zone partially filled with calcium carbonates; e)
situation where more calcium carbonate precipitated than portlandite
dissolved, leading to the formation of a porous precipitate outside
of the cement, partially filling the defect, thus reducing its aperture.
Parts f) and g) illustrate examples of the constant and variable aperture
model domains considered in the study.
a) Schematic
illustration of the numerical scheme, discretizing
the sample into cylindrical segments. Domain consists of N = 1000 segments. Parts b-e) show radial chemical zonation and formation
of porous zones within the cement and inside the defect aperture.
Here, orange roughly corresponds to Z1, dark green corresponds to
Z2+Z3, and light green corresponds to carbonates formed outside of
the original cement matrix. b) Initial condition, before chemical
reaction; c) as portlandite dissolves, a porous zone forms in the
cement; d) porous zone partially filled with calcium carbonates; e)
situation where more calcium carbonate precipitated than portlandite
dissolved, leading to the formation of a porous precipitate outside
of the cement, partially filling the defect, thus reducing its aperture.
Parts f) and g) illustrate examples of the constant and variable aperture
model domains considered in the study.
Solution Phase: Initial and Boundary Conditions
At
the inlet boundary, the concentrations of components in solution are
maintained in equilibrium with a fixed molar CO2 concentration,
while the boundary r = Rsteel is assigned zero flux. This corresponds with the situation where
CO2-rich aqueous fluid permeates a “wellbore system”
consisting of a cement-plugged steel tubular suffering a radially
symmetric debonding defect. Aqueous species within the domain are
considered to initially be in equilibrium with portlandite, producing
a highly alkaline solution phase.
Solid Phase: Including
Effects of Chemical Zonation
As reaction with CO2 proceeds, cement phases can dissolve
and carbonates can precipitate and redissolve. In experiments, chemical
reaction produces a sequence of alteration fronts in the cement, typically
including the following: (Z1) a depleted, amorphous silicate-dominated
zone at the exposed surface, followed by (Z2) a calcium carbonate-rich
zone, (Z3) a narrow, densely carbonated front, (Z4) a zone of reduced
portlandite content, and finally (Z5) apparently unaltered cement
(Z1–Z5, Figure d; SI, Section 1.1), some of which are
permeable to flow[38,49] In the model, this chemical zonation
was simplified and implemented as follows. The depleted zone (Z1)
and carbonated zones (Z2+Z3) are included (roughly corresponding to
the orange and green colors in Figure d, respectively), while the reduced portlandite zone
(Z4) is not explicitly included but treated as a sharp boundary (SI, Section 2.1) and lumped with the unaltered
cement (Z5). This simplification is reasonable, considering previous
studies[41,50] have shown that the largest changes in matrix
permeability occur in Z1 (increase) and Z2+Z3 (decrease), and moreover
considering that these matrix permeability changes have a small impact
on overall permeability compared to defect clogging.In this
simplified zonation model, portlandite dissolving out of the cement
matrix leaves behind porous alteration zones (Z1). At the same time,
calcium carbonate encrustations may produce porous structures growing
on the cement surface, thereby partially or completely filling the
initial debonding defect. Accordingly, porous, permeable zones may
develop both inside (due to cement alteration, κ) and outside (as carbonate encrustation, κcarb) the original cement volume defined by Rcement. Assuming fixed values for κ andκcarb, creation of such porous
regions (Z1 + defect infill) is incorporated in the numerical scheme
by introducing three additional radii. The first, RPCC(t) [m], is the radius of a cement
core that, at a given time, is not yet affected by reaction and contains
portlandite (PCC = “Portlandite Containing Cement”; Figure c). The other two
radii are Rinner(t) and Router(t) [m], defining the
inner and outer radii of the porous zones. The developed porous materials
are considered permeable with permeability κporous [m2]. Accordingly, for this partially reacted state,
fluid flow may occur both through the debonding defect, which now
has a hydraulic aperture of w = Rsteel – Router [m],
and through the newly formed porous phase, bounded by Rinner and Router (Figures d, 2e).Initially, RPCC, Rinner, and Router are all
equal to Rcement. As dissolution and precipitation
proceed, the radii are calculated and updated each time step. For
each segment, RPCC(t)
is calculated by assuming that the portlandite-depleted cement is
separated from the unreacted cement core by a sharp reaction front[46,51] (Figure c). This
gives , where ξP [-] is the extent
of portlandite dissolution in the segment volume.During precipitation,
we assume that carbonates first fill the
pore space created by portlandite dissolution in the cement matrix
and that any excess precipitates on top of the cement (i.e., inside
the debonding defect) as a porous layer. Accordingly, the values of Rinner and Router in each segment depend on the volume of carbonate precipitated relative
to that of portlandite dissolved. Details of these calculations are
provided in SI, Section 2.1. We assume
that carbonated zones in the cement (Z2+Z3) can be considered impermeable
to flow compared to the defect, i.e. κ ≪ κapp.
Fluid
Flow Simulation
Applying a constant pressure
difference across the domain, ΔP [Pa], we assume
the flux through each cylindrical segment, Q [m3 s–1], can be described bywhere κsegment [m2] is the effective permeability of the segment, Asegment = πRsteel2 [m2] is the cross-sectional
area, μ [Pa s] is the dynamic viscosity,
and ΔPsegment [Pa] is the pressure
difference acting across each individual segment, with ΔP = ∑ΔPsegment.Cross sections perpendicular to the flow direction essentially
consist of three subregions: a) impermeable, unreacted, or carbonate-enriched
cement (0 ≤ r ≤ Rinner), b) a zone consisting of porous and permeable solids
(Rinner ≤ r ≤ Router), and c) the open debonding defect (Router ≤ r ≤ Rsteel). To obtain flow rate, we evaluate the
contribution of each subregion to the total fluid flux. As detailed
in SI, Section 2.2, this givesCombining eqs and 2, we
have an expression for the total volumetric
flow (Qtotal) through each segment. Assuming
incompressible flow and ignoring small changes in fluid volume related
to chemical reaction,[52] the continuity
equation requires the inflow to be equal to the outflow for any individual
segment. This condition can be applied to each segment resulting in
a linear system of equations with a sparse, symmetric, and positive-definitive
coefficient matrix, which is solved to obtain the pressure and flow
velocity distribution throughout the domain.[53]To facilitate comparison with lab experiments, the integrated,
apparent permeability of the whole model domain (κapp) was calculated as[54]where Qtotal [m3 s–1] is the total flux,
and L [m] is the length of the domain (i.e., steel
tube).
Solute Transport along the Well System
To simulate
transport of solutes along the sample, segment-averaged concentrations
of dissolved species are obtained for the solution phase in the defect.
Chemical components are transported by advection and molecular diffusion.
Calculations were carried out by considering each segment as a control
volume. We used a backward Euler scheme for the temporal discretization
and first-order upwind and central schemes for spatial discretization
of the advection and diffusion terms, respectively.[55]The mass balance equation for componentain segment i may be written asHere, c and c are the concentrations
of aqueous species a in segment i and the upstream segment i–1, respectively, D0 is the diffusion coefficient, A denotes the cross-sectional area open
to flow, and l and l are the distances between the center of segment i and the centers of the segments upstream and downstream
of segment i, respectively. The terms R represent concentration
changes due to chemical reactions (SI,
Section 2). Eq is solved
using a sequential, noniterative approach. For each time step, the
transport part (i.e., without considering the reaction source/sink
term) is solved using a fully implicit method,[55] and then the reaction terms are solved.[56,57] As precipitation and dissolution change the velocity as well as
the void volume in the segments, the time step was adjusted dynamically
based on solute residence times.
Chemical Reactions
Following Raoof et al.,[50] we limit the
cement phases included to portlandite,
while implementing carbonates as calcite. Such a simplification is
permissible considering that the relative solid volume changes associated
with portlandite carbonation and conversion of C–S–H
into amorphous silica and carbonate are similar and thus may be expected
to have a similar impact on porosity generation or widening of defects
and hence on permeability evolution.[50] Moreover,
C–S–H reacts slowly compared to portlandite, causing
the latter to dominate reaction on time scales of days.[40] The reaction scheme used in the model thus consists
of 8 reactions (Table S1). Those involving
only aqueous species are treated as equilibrium reactions, while dissolution–precipitation
of portlandite and calcite are incorporated as kinetic processes.
Dissolution–Precipitation of Portlandite and Calcium
Carbonates
Initially, portlandite is present in the cement
at the cement-defect interface and hence directly exposed to the defect
fluid. For such short transport distances, the rate of dissolution
(rP) [mol s–1] will
be controlled by surface reaction kinetics[50,58,59]where AP [m2] denotes the reactive surface area of
portlandite, kP [mol m–2 s–1] is a reaction rate constant, and [-] denote the activities of the
subscripted
species, and KPeq [-] is the solubility product for portlandite
(Table S1). In using eq , the reactive surface area is assumed proportional
to the volume fraction of portlandite and the cylindrical surface
area of the solid (A) viawhere αP [-]
is a constant accounting for surface roughness, and ξP [-] denotes the extent of dissolution of portlandite in the segment.As portlandite becomes depleted near the defect surface, the reaction
front migrates into the cement matrix.[60] Consequently, the rate at which Ca2+ and OH– are released will gradually become limited by transport through
the matrix. Under these conditions, the effective rate of reaction
between the cement and the fluid in the debonding defect depends on
the mass transfer rate at the cement-defect interface (r = Rcement). This rate is assessed using
the analytical solution for a hollow cylinder of inner radius RPCC and outer radius Rcement, which are kept at concentrations CPeq and CPgap, respectively. Based on this diffusion model, we have formulated
an effective reaction rate (rP)[61] (SI, Section 2.3)where Deff [m2 s–1] is an effective diffusion
coefficient for the cement matrix, and CPeq [mol m–3] denotes the equilibrium portlandite concentration. From the above,
we have two expressions for the rate of portlandite dissolution. Eq defines the surface reaction-controlled
dissolution kinetics, while eq employs an effective reaction rate constant[61] to simulate the transport-controlled kinetics that come
into play as the reaction front proceeds into the cement matrix. At
any given time, the slowest of these processes will be rate-controlling.
Similarly, the reaction rate of calcium carbonate precipitation-dissolution
(rC) is implemented as[50,62]where AC [m2] is the reactive surface area of calcite, k1, k2, and k3 [mol m–2 s–1] are rate constants, , , and [-] denote activities
of the subscripted
species, and KCeq [-] is the solubility product for calcite
(SI, Section 2.4). The reactive surface
area is approximated AC = αCAsolid for both precipitation
and dissolution, where αC [-] accounts for surface
roughness. Temperature-corrected reaction rate constants (kP, k1, k2, and k3) are calculated
assuming an Arrhenius-type relation, using data from Table S1.
Reference Case Parameter Values
In establishing the
reference case model, parameters and boundary conditions were chosen
to correspond with experiment T60-1 of Wolterbeek et al.[44] A 6-m-long domain was discretized into 1000
segments, with Rsteel = 3 mm and = 6 mm. Temperature
(T) and pressure difference (ΔP) were set to
60 °C and 0.6 MPa, consistent with the experimental conditions.
We used μ = 4.84 × 10–4 Pa s, corresponding
to the dynamic viscosity of a 0.3 M NaCl solution at 60 °C and
10 MPa,[63] used to mimic the ionic strength
of cement pore fluids.[64,65] For the reference case model,
we used a uniform defect with an initial hydraulic aperture (w0) of 18.3 μm. This aperture was chosen
to ensure that the initial apparent permeability of the model domain
equals that of sample T60-1 (Figure a). This way, the initial flux (Qtotal0) in the simulations
will correspond with the experiment. We set κporous = 10–15 m2 for the permeability of
porous solids, and took φCP = 0.3 for the porosity
of the carbonate material formed outside of the original cement volume,
to calculate the volume of defect-filling calcium carbonate precipitates
(SI, Section 2.1). Based on calculations
assuming a radial interaction depth of ∼3 μm and a portlandite
specific surface area of 16.5 m2 g–1,[66] we took αP = 100. For αC the same value was used. The initial portlandite content
(fP0) was set to 20 vol %, based on typical values for cement.[67] The “reference case” value for Deff is based on (temperature-corrected) diffusion
coefficient measurements for sodium chloride in pristine cements.[67] Considering the effect of CO2-induced
reaction on matrix structure and tortuosity, we used Deff = 10–9 m2 s–1 at 60 °C and later varied this value between 10–10 and 10–8 m2 s–1,
to explore its impact. The upper and lower limits of the range thus
investigated were obtained by increasing and decreasing this reference
value one order, respectively.
Simulation
Results and Analysis
Reference Case (Case RF) Simulation
Figures a–3d show concentration profiles for selected dissolved
species
at various times. Similarly, Figures e–3h show portlandite
and calcium carbonate content for the first 4 m of the model domain,
as well as Router and RPCC data.
Figure 3
Results of the reference case simulation. a) pH, b) HCO3–, c) CO32–, and d)
Ca2+ concentrations along the defect pathway at different
times; e) and g) show profiles of calcium carbonate and portlandite
content along the defect pathway at different times, while f) and
g) show corresponding profiles for Router and RPCC.
Results of the reference case simulation. a) pH, b) HCO3–, c) CO32–, and d)
Ca2+ concentrations along the defect pathway at different
times; e) and g) show profiles of calcium carbonate and portlandite
content along the defect pathway at different times, while f) and
g) show corresponding profiles for Router and RPCC.The ingress of CO2-rich solution (pH = 3.4) leads
to
rapid acidification of the fluid in the defect, particularly near
the inlet boundary (Figure a; e.g. 1h curve). This prompts the dissolution of portlandite
in the cement exposed to the defect (Figure g), buffering the fluid pH to more alkaline
values while producing Ca2+ (Figure d) and (bi)carbonate (Figures b, 3c), which together
precipitate as calcium carbonate (Figure e).As portlandite becomes depleted
near the cement-defect interface
and the reaction front migrates into the cement matrix (Figure h), the effectiveness by which
the defect fluid can be buffered diminishes, allowing the acidic fluid
front to migrate progressively larger distances downstream (Figure a, compare 1, 2,
and 4 h curves). However, concurrent with diminishment of the portlandite
buffering-capacity, gradual accumulation of calcium carbonate precipitates
(Figure e) produces
a constriction in the defect aperture (Figure f), reducing defect conductivity and hence
the flow of CO2-rich fluid. While the transport regime
is initially highly advective, due to the presence of the open debonding
defect, we observe a gradual shift to diffusion-controlled conditions
due to this precipitation effect. The interplay between diminishing
flow in the defect and slowing diffusional reaction in the cement
matrix produces a turning point, where the advancing acidic front
reaches a maximum downstream extent of nearly 3 m (Figure ). From thereon, effects of
decreasing flow rate start to outstrip those of portlandite depletion,
and we observe a subsequent retreat of the pH front, back toward the
inlet, between 4 and 24 h (Figure a). Precipitation of carbonate thus becomes concentrated
close to the inlet (Figure e), entirely filling the defect aperture after ∼18
h (Figure f). At the
end of the simulation, the radial extent of cement alteration ranges
from ∼1.5 mm along the first ∼20 cm of the domain and
then quickly reduces to ∼0.6 mm, to gradually disappear at
about 3 m downstream (Figure h).Figure shows the
evolution of apparent permeability of the domain with time and injected
volume. Most reduction in permeability occurs during the first ∼18
h, as it decreases from 3.4 × 10–13 to 1.4
× 10–15 m2. At later times, permeability
reduction is more gradual, due to a lower influx of CO2 and hence slower carbonate precipitation. In total, about 30 mL
of CO2-rich fluid has been injected in the reference case
simulation. While taking a uniform debonding defect is a simplification,
the model appears capable of producing the main trends and features
of the reactive flow-through experiments. However, note that compared
to lab experiment T60-1 (Figure ), the reference case simulation shows a) more rapid
permeability reduction and b) a greater downstream extent of alteration
(∼3 m vs ∼73 cm).
Figure 4
Apparent sample permeability versus a)
time and b) injected fluid
volume for the reference case.
Apparent sample permeability versus a)
time and b) injected fluid
volume for the reference case.
Effects of Model Parameters for Reaction and Transport
In
an attempt to improve the match between our model results and
lab experiments, we performed a series of simulations where the values
of Deff, αP, αC, fP0, κporous, and φCP were varied systematically (SI, Section 3). As observed by Brunet et al.,[40] we found that the reactive transport dynamics are predominantly
determined by diffusion-controlled portlandite dissolution. Increasing
the diffusion rate and reaction rates of portlandite and calcite dissolution–precipitation
resulted in faster permeability reduction and tended to concentrate
chemical alteration closer to the inlet (Figure
S2). Increasing the initial portlandite content led to minor
reduction in downstream extent of alteration, while promoting self-sealing
(Figure S3). Changing the matrix permeability
of porous zones (κporous) had little effect on early
stage behavior, as free flow through the defect dominated the flux,
but impacted late-stage permeability as the defect became largely
clogged (Figure S4). Reduction of the porosity
of calcium carbonate precipitates (φCP) was found
to increase the downstream extent of alteration, while slowing permeability
reduction (Figure S5).Overall, the
sensitivity analysis results demonstrated that the agreement between
our model and lab experiments cannot be improved significantly by
only the optimization of Deff, αP, αC, fP0, κporous, and
φCP. If these parameters are modified to obtain better
correspondence with the temporal data (produce more gradual permeability
reduction), for example, then the match with spatial data will invariably
diminish (chemical alteration extends farther downstream) and vice
versa.
Effect of Defect Aperture Variations in the Model Domain
Debonding defects and fractures in real wellbores will likely have
complex geometries, displaying variations in aperture similar to those
seen in our lab experiments.[44] Having found
that uniform aperture models cannot capture the temporal (permeability
evolution) and spatial (chemical zonation) data from our lab experiments
simultaneously, the effects of nonuniform defects need to be explored.
In designing variable aperture model domains, we ensured that the
initial apparent permeability (κapp0) of these domains equals 3.4 ×
10–13 m2, i.e. equals both κapp0 of experiment
T60-1 of Wolterbeek et al.[44] and κapp0 of the uniform
aperture models. Details on the variable defect geometries tested
are provided in SI, Section 4.In
simulations Cases 10–13, we investigate the effect of periodic,
sinusoidal variations in defect aperture (here ranging 10.3–60.0
μm, Figure g)
for different wavelengths corresponding to 2, 4, 8, and 16 periods
per 6 m, in simulations Cases 10–13, respectively (see Figures and S6). The most proximal minimum in aperture accordingly
occurs at 150 cm downstream in Case 10 and progressively closer to
the inlet in Cases 11, 12, and 13 (75, 37.5, and 18.75 cm downstream,
respectively). While the initial fluid flux equals 7.15 mL h–1 in all simulations, the fluid velocity fluctuates along the sample
with variation in defect aperture, hence the cross-sectional area
is open to flow. Comparing reaction zonation developed in the sinusoidal
model simulations (Figure a), we observe an increase in maximum downstream extent of
cement alteration with increasing distance of the first crest of the
sinusoid. Note that the extent of alteration in Cases 12 and 13 is
less than in our reference simulation using a uniform defect, while
reaction progressed further downstream in Cases 10 and 11 (Figure a). Considering permeability
evolution, however, all variable aperture model simulations self-seal
slower compared to the uniform aperture model (Figure b). This can be explained by the periodic
slowdown of the fluid in wider parts of the variable defect, where
it has more time to be buffered by portlandite and hence where the
bulk of calcium carbonate precipitation occurs. Only after portlandite
has been dissolved away near the inlet, slowing down the reaction
kinetics, inhibiting full buffering of the fluid before it reaches
the first constriction, does precipitation of calcium carbonates commence
where it matters, namely inside the narrowest parts of the defect.
This produces a delay in effective permeability reduction.
Figure 5
Effect of sinusoidal
aperture variations (see Figure S6, Table S2); a) and b)
show calcium carbonate and portlandite content profiles after 48 h;
c) and d) show apparent sample permeability evolution with time and
injected fluid volume. Shaded sinusoids show aperture geometry up
to first crest (cf. Figure g).
Effect of sinusoidal
aperture variations (see Figure S6, Table S2); a) and b)
show calcium carbonate and portlandite content profiles after 48 h;
c) and d) show apparent sample permeability evolution with time and
injected fluid volume. Shaded sinusoids show aperture geometry up
to first crest (cf. Figure g).In addition, we tested
variable defect models employing a single
step in aperture, occurring halfway the model domain (Figure S7). These simulations show that if the defect is narrow
along the upstream half, permeability decreases rapidly (∼3
orders in 10 h). Conversely, if the defect is large over the upstream
half, precipitation cannot seal the aperture effectively, and permeability
hardly changes. Only after the reaction front migrates downstream
and reaches the narrow portion of the defect, permeability starts
to decrease markedly (Figure S7).
Simulating
the Effects of Defect Geometry in Sample T60-1
The debonding
defects created in sample T60-1 of our lab experiments
were much wider close to the inlet, compared to further downstream.[44] To investigate the effect of this enlarged defect
entrance, we used model domains characterized by a constant defect
aperture of 18.3 μm, except for the upstream-most 1.8 to 7.2
cm, where the aperture was set to 500 μm. Compared to the uniform
aperture model results, imposing such an enlargement led to a) the
reaction being concentrated closer to the inlet and b) more gradual
permeability reduction (Figure S8). This
can again be interpreted in terms of two competing effects. On the
one hand, wider apertures increase residence time, thus limiting the
distance CO2-rich fluid travels before it is buffered by
portlandite. On the other hand, precipitation in the wide parts of
the defect will have little effect on the domain-scale permeability.
In simulations that include an enlarged defect entrance, efficient
precipitation causes the fluid composition to reduce in supersaturation
with respect to carbonates (while Ca-ions are sourced locally, availability
of (bi)carbonate ions depends on supply by the inlet fluid). The fluid
that enters the narrow part of the defect has thus been preconditioned
by reaction with portlandite during the time spent traversing the
wide part of the defect. Consequently, the potential for reaction
and calcium carbonate precipitation will be lower, leading to less
efficient precipitation and slower permeability reduction.Figure shows the modeling
results from selected simulations superimposed on the laboratory data
for experiment T60-1 of Wolterbeek et al.[44] When including aperture variations, we found that wide regions produce
locally slower fluid velocities, allowing more efficient buffering
by dissolving portlandite. At the same time, precipitation of calcium
carbonates within these locally wide zones has little effect on sample-scale
permeability. Clearly, including nonuniform defect geometry effects
allowed us to obtain closer agreement between the simulations and
laboratory experiment T60-1. The improved match between the experimental
data and modeling results obtained using variable aperture domains
demonstrates that the initial defect geometry has a key role in determining
how reactive transport manifests in long-range debonded wellbore interfaces.
Figure 6
Comparison
of experimental data from T60-1 (Figure ) with selected simulation results (see Table S2); a) and b) show calcium carbonate and
portlandite content profiles after 48 h; c) and d) show apparent sample
permeability evolution with time and injected fluid volume.
Comparison
of experimental data from T60-1 (Figure ) with selected simulation results (see Table S2); a) and b) show calcium carbonate and
portlandite content profiles after 48 h; c) and d) show apparent sample
permeability evolution with time and injected fluid volume.
Environmental
Implications
Confident assessment of leakage risks requires
application of integrated
models that comprise and capture the behavior of the entire wellbore
system. In this study, we have developed a long-range reactive transport
model that allows us to consider effects of variable defect geometries
on the permeability evolution of CO2-exposed debonding
defects and used it to simulate the meter-scale lab experiments of
Wolterbeek et al.[44]As shown in this
study, inflow of CO2-rich fluid leads
to progressive acidification of the fluid phase in the wellbore defect.
This initiates dissolution of portlandite in the cement, buffering
fluid pH to higher values and releasing Ca2+ into solution.
In turn, this leads to the formation of porous calcium carbonate precipitates
inside the defect apertures. As defect conductivity goes down, due
to this precipitation, we observe a shift in reactive transport regime,
causing acidic conditions in the defect fluid to gradually retreat
toward the inlet for CO2-rich water. Consequently, dissolution
and precipitation become progressively more concentrated at the upstream
end of the sample, eventually sealing the defect aperture close to
the inlet. Our meter-scale model could capture the main aspects of
reactive transport, simulating the permeability evolution as seen
in the flow-through experiments.[44] Increasing
the diffusion and reaction rates decreases the extent of cement alteration
and accelerates permeability reduction.We found that incorporating
more realistic defect geometries, characterized
by a nonuniform initial aperture, strongly affects reactive transport
and the spatial distribution of carbonate precipitation. Moreover,
including such nonuniform defects was required to simultaneously capture
both the spatial alteration pattern and the temporal evolution of
sample permeability as observed in previously reported lab experiments.
We thus infer that reliable prediction and upscaling of lab data requires
wellbore models to include realistic defect geometries. Future studies
should probably include and study the effect of lateral variations
in defect aperture, in addition to the longitudinal variations tested
here.
Authors: Michael L Szulczewski; Christopher W MacMinn; Howard J Herzog; Ruben Juanes Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2012-03-19 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Harris E Mason; Wyatt L Du Frane; Stuart D C Walsh; Zurong Dai; Supakit Charnvanichborikarn; Susan A Carroll Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2013-01-11 Impact factor: 9.028