Literature DB >> 22431639

Lifetime of carbon capture and storage as a climate-change mitigation technology.

Michael L Szulczewski1, Christopher W MacMinn, Howard J Herzog, Ruben Juanes.   

Abstract

In carbon capture and storage (CCS), CO(2) is captured at power plants and then injected underground into reservoirs like deep saline aquifers for long-term storage. While CCS may be critical for the continued use of fossil fuels in a carbon-constrained world, the deployment of CCS has been hindered by uncertainty in geologic storage capacities and sustainable injection rates, which has contributed to the absence of concerted government policy. Here, we clarify the potential of CCS to mitigate emissions in the United States by developing a storage-capacity supply curve that, unlike current large-scale capacity estimates, is derived from the fluid mechanics of CO(2) injection and trapping and incorporates injection-rate constraints. We show that storage supply is a dynamic quantity that grows with the duration of CCS, and we interpret the lifetime of CCS as the time for which the storage supply curve exceeds the storage demand curve from CO(2) production. We show that in the United States, if CO(2) production from power generation continues to rise at recent rates, then CCS can store enough CO(2) to stabilize emissions at current levels for at least 100 y. This result suggests that the large-scale implementation of CCS is a geologically viable climate-change mitigation option in the United States over the next century.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22431639      PMCID: PMC3325663          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1115347109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  6 in total

Review 1.  The global carbon cycle: a test of our knowledge of earth as a system.

Authors:  P Falkowski; R J Scholes; E Boyle; J Canadell; D Canfield; J Elser; N Gruber; K Hibbard; P Högberg; S Linder; F T Mackenzie; B Moore; T Pedersen; Y Rosenthal; S Seitzinger; V Smetacek; W Steffen
Journal:  Science       Date:  2000-10-13       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Advanced technology paths to global climate stability: energy for a greenhouse planet.

Authors:  Martin I Hoffert; Ken Caldeira; Gregory Benford; David R Criswell; Christopher Green; Howard Herzog; Atul K Jain; Haroon S Kheshgi; Klaus S Lackner; John S Lewis; H Douglas Lightfoot; Wallace Manheimer; John C Mankins; Michael E Mauel; L John Perkins; Michael E Schlesinger; Tyler Volk; Tom M L Wigley
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-11-01       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Climate change. A guide to CO2 sequestration.

Authors:  Klaus S Lackner
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-06-13       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies.

Authors:  S Pacala; R Socolow
Journal:  Science       Date:  2004-08-13       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Onshore geologic storage of CO2.

Authors:  Franklin M Orr
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Model for CO2 leakage including multiple geological layers and multiple leaky wells.

Authors:  Jan M Nordbotten; Dmitri Kavetski; Michael A Celia; Stefan Bachu
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-02-01       Impact factor: 9.028

  6 in total
  17 in total

1.  Geologic carbon storage is unlikely to trigger large earthquakes and reactivate faults through which CO2 could leak.

Authors:  Victor Vilarrasa; Jesus Carrera
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Restoring universality to the pinch-off of a bubble.

Authors:  Amir A Pahlavan; Howard A Stone; Gareth H McKinley; Ruben Juanes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  No geologic evidence that seismicity causes fault leakage that would render large-scale carbon capture and storage unsuccessful.

Authors:  Ruben Juanes; Bradford H Hager; Howard J Herzog
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Constraints on the magnitude and rate of CO2 dissolution at Bravo Dome natural gas field.

Authors:  Kiran J Sathaye; Marc A Hesse; Martin Cassidy; Daniel F Stockli
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Wettability control on multiphase flow in patterned microfluidics.

Authors:  Benzhong Zhao; Christopher W MacMinn; Ruben Juanes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Stretching and folding sustain microscale chemical gradients in porous media.

Authors:  Joris Heyman; Daniel R Lester; Régis Turuban; Yves Méheust; Tanguy Le Borgne
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Carbon dioxide reduction to methane and coupling with acetylene to form propylene catalyzed by remodeled nitrogenase.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Yang; Vivian R Moure; Dennis R Dean; Lance C Seefeldt
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Experiment and Optimization for Simultaneous Carbonation of Ca(2+) and Mg(2+) in A Two-phase System of Insoluble Diisobutylamine and Aqueous Solution.

Authors:  Wenlong Wang; Man Wang; Xin Liu; Peng Wang; Zhenqian Xi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Microbial stimulation and succession following a test well injection simulating CO2 leakage into a shallow Newark basin aquifer.

Authors:  Gregory O'Mullan; M Elias Dueker; Kale Clauson; Qiang Yang; Kelsey Umemoto; Natalia Zakharova; Juerg Matter; Martin Stute; Taro Takahashi; David Goldberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multi-generational responses of a marine polychaete to a rapid change in seawater pCO2.

Authors:  Araceli Rodríguez-Romero; Michael D Jarrold; Gloria Massamba-N'Siala; John I Spicer; Piero Calosi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-12-18       Impact factor: 5.183

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.