Literature DB >> 29516330

Application of Pharmacometric Analysis in the Design of Clinical Pharmacology Studies for Biosimilar Development.

Peijuan Zhu1, Sherwin K B Sy2, Andrej Skerjanec3.   

Abstract

This article provides an overview of four case studies to demonstrate the utility of pharmacometric analysis in biosimilar development to help design sensitive clinical pharmacology studies for the demonstration of biosimilarity. The two major factors that determine the sensitivity of a clinical pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) study to demonstrate biosimilarity are the size of the potential difference to be detected (signal) and the inter-subject variability (noise), both of which can be characterized and predicted using pharmacometric approaches. To maximize the chance to detect any potential difference between the proposed biosimilar and the reference drug, the dose selected for the clinical pharmacology study should fall on the steep part of the dose-response curve. Pharmacometric analysis can be used to characterize the dose-response relationship using PD- or PK/PD-linked models. The understanding of the PD endpoints in terms of dynamic range of the response and the location of the studied dose on the dose-response curve can provide strategic advantage in the trial design. To reduce the inter-subject variability (noise), pharmacometric analysis can help avoid high variability associated with low doses, and decrease variability by controlling certain covariates in the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Pharmacometric analysis also can help select or justify margins for the equivalence test of PD endpoints. Pharmacometric analysis will assume an ever-increasing role in the clinical development of biosimilar drugs, as it helps to ensure that sufficient sensitivity is built into the study design to detect potential PK and PD differences.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosimilar; clinical pharmacology study; dose-response; modeling and simulation; pharmacodynamics (PD); pharmacokinetics (PK); pharmacometric analysis; trial design

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29516330     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-018-0196-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  17 in total

1.  General pharmacokinetic model for drugs exhibiting target-mediated drug disposition.

Authors:  D E Mager; W J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.745

Review 2.  Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Nathanael L Dirks; Bernd Meibohm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 6.447

3.  Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling of pegfilgrastim in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Lorin K Roskos; Peggy Lum; Pamela Lockbaum; Gisela Schwab; Bing-Bing Yang
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.126

4.  The use of pharmacometrics to optimize biosimilar development.

Authors:  Mike Dodds; Vincent Chow; Richard Markus; Juan José Pérez-Ruixo; Danny Shen; Megan Gibbs
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 5.  Exploratory assessment of dose proportionality: review of current approaches and proposal for a practical criterion.

Authors:  Jürgen Hummel; Sue McKendrick; Charlie Brindley; Raymond French
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.894

Review 6.  Characteristics of indirect pharmacodynamic models and applications to clinical drug responses.

Authors:  A Sharma; W J Jusko
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Prognostic roles of absolute monocyte and absolute lymphocyte counts in patients with advanced-stage follicular lymphoma in the rituximab era: an analysis from the FOLL05 trial of the Fondazione Italiana Linfomi.

Authors:  Luigi Marcheselli; Alessia Bari; Antonella Anastasia; Barbara Botto; Benedetta Puccini; Alessandra Dondi; Angelo M Carella; Isabel Alvarez; Annalisa Chiarenza; Annalisa Arcari; Flavia Salvi; Massimo Federico
Journal:  Br J Haematol       Date:  2015-03-29       Impact factor: 6.998

Review 8.  Elimination mechanisms of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Mohammad A Tabrizi; Chih-Ming L Tseng; Lorin K Roskos
Journal:  Drug Discov Today       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 7.851

9.  A randomised, double-blind trial to demonstrate bioequivalence of GP2013 and reference rituximab combined with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Josef S Smolen; Stanley B Cohen; Hans-Peter Tony; Morton Scheinberg; Alan Kivitz; Andra Balanescu; Juan Gomez-Reino; Liyi Cen; Peijuan Zhu; Tamas Shisha
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2017-06-21       Impact factor: 19.103

10.  A Randomized, Phase I Pharmacokinetic Study Comparing SB2 and Infliximab Reference Product (Remicade(®)) in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Donghoon Shin; Youngdoe Kim; Yoo Seok Kim; Thomas Körnicke; Rainard Fuhr
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.807

View more
  1 in total

1.  Using Clinical PK/PD Studies to Support No Clinically Meaningful Differences Between a Proposed Biosimilar and the Reference Product.

Authors:  Peijuan Zhu; Ping Ji; Yaning Wang
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 4.009

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.