| Literature DB >> 29516063 |
Aakanksha Rathor1,2, Abhinandan Bhattacharjee2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether there is a clinical-radiological correlation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS), to compare operative findings with those of computed tomography (CT) imaging, and to determine the importance of a CT score and staging in management of CRS.Entities:
Keywords: Anatomical variation; Chronicrhinosinusitis; Computed tomography; Nasal endoscopy; Sinus
Year: 2017 PMID: 29516063 PMCID: PMC5829301 DOI: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2017.02.008
Source DB: PubMed Journal: World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg ISSN: 2095-8811
Fig. 1The various symptoms at presentation.
Radiological assessment of sinonasal disease.
| CT-scan finding | Laterality | Number of patients | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unilateral | Bilateral | |||
| Sinonasal polyposis | 15 (44.1%) | 5 (14.7%) | 20 | 58.8 |
| Ostiomeatal complex pattern | 6 (17.6%) | 2 (5.9%) | 8 | 23.5 |
| Sphenoethmoidal pattern | 3 (8.8%) | 2 (5.9%) | 5 | 14.7 |
| Infundibular pattern | 1 (2.9%) | 0 | 1 | 2.9 |
Distribution of sinonasal disease as per the Lund–Mackay CT score.
| Disease | Percentage of patients (%) | Number of patients (Laterality) |
|---|---|---|
| Maxillary | 19.1 | 13 |
| Ant ethmoids | 13.2 | 9 |
| Post ethmoids | 4.4 | 3 |
| Sphenoid | 4.4 | 3 |
| Frontal | 2.9 | 2 |
| Ostiomeatal complex | 8.8 | 6 |
The statistical correlation between the Lund–Mackay symptom score and Lund–Mackay CT score.
| LM symptom score | LM CT score | Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean score | 25.2 ± 7.9 | 3.7 ± 2.2 | 0.1521 | 0.1963–0.4663 | 0.3906 |
Comparison of Lund–Mackay symptom score across different Kennedy computed tomography stages.
| Stage 1 | Stage 2 | Stage 3 | Stage 4 | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean LM symptom score | 23.4 ± 7.9 | 18.9 ± 3.2 | 30.6 ± 8.5 | 30.4 ± 3.9 | 0.0259 | |
| Stage 1 vs. Stage 2 | −4.9 to 14.7 | |||||
| Stage 1 vs. Stage 3 | −15.9 to 2.3 | |||||
| Stage 1 vs. Stage 4 | −16.4 to 3.2 | |||||
| Stage 2 vs. Stage 3 | −23.4 to 0.07 | |||||
| Stage 2 vs. Stage 4 | −23.8 to 0.78 | |||||
| Stage 3 vs. Stage 4 | −11.5 to 11.9 |
Data were compared using the Tukey–Kramer multiple comparisons test.
Percentage of cases showing similarity between Kennedy computed tomography staging and intraoperative findings.
| Kennedy CT staging | Number of cases | Intraoperative finding | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Similar to CT scan finding | Not similar to CT scan finding | ||
| Ⅰ | 18 | 12 (66.7%) | 6 (33.3%) |
| Ⅱ | 5 | 3 (60.0%) | 2 (40.0%) |
| Ⅲ | 6 | 5 (83.3%) | 1 (16.7%) |
| Ⅳ | 5 | 4 (80.0%) | 1 (20.0%) |
Fig. 2Incidence of the anatomical variations in paranasal sinuses.
Anatomical variations in symptomatic patients from various studies.
| Anatomical variations | Jones | Basić et al | Arslan | Danese | Lloy | Kayalioglu | Tonai and Baba | Calhoun | Bolger | Present study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of patients | 100 | 212 | 200 | 112 | 100 | 90 | 57 | 82 | 166 | 34 |
| Concha bullosa | 18 | 30 | 31 | 24 | 29 | – | 29 | 53.6 | 10 | |
| Paradoxical middle turbinate | 7 | – | – | – | 15 | – | 30 | 12 | 27.1 | 2 |
| Bulla ethmoidalis with medial bony contact | 10 | – | – | – | – | – | 28.1 | – | – | 4 |
| Paradoxical uncinate | 6 | – | 3 | 31 | 21 | 12.2 | – | – | – | 2 |
| Pneumatizeduncinate | 0 | – | 2 | – | – | – | – | 3 | 0 | |
| Septal deviation | 24 | – | 36 | 33 | – | 22 | – | 40 | – | 19 |
| Hallers cell | 6 | 21.2 | 6 | 34 | – | 5 | 33 | – | 45.9 | 2 |
| Onodi cell | 7 | 10.4 | 12 | – | – | – | – | – | – | 1 |
| Aggernasi cell | 95 | – | – | 3 | – | – | – | – | – | 0 |