| Literature DB >> 29516031 |
Adedeji O Afolabi1, Rapheal A Ojelabi1, Patience F Tunji-Olayeni1, Olabosipo I Fagbenle1, Timothy O Mosaku1.
Abstract
The unique qualities of women can make them bearers of solutions towards achieving sustainability and dealing with the dangers attributed to climate change. The attitudinal study utilized a questionnaire instrument to obtain perception of female construction professionals. By using a well-structured questionnaire, data was obtained on women participating in green jobs in the construction Industry. Descriptive statistics is performed on the collected data and presented in tables and mean scores (MS). In addition, inferential statistics of categorical regression was performed on the data to determine the level of influence (beta factor) the identified barriers had on the level of participation in green jobs. Barriers and the socio-economic benefits which can guide policies and actions on attracting, retaining and exploring the capabilities of women in green jobs can be obtained from the survey data when analyzed.Entities:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29516031 PMCID: PMC5834649 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2018.02.009
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1: Summarized overview of the background information of the women construction professionals.
Summary of the Total score of the background information of the sample.
| Mean | 2.26 | 3.39 | 2.98 | 3.07 | 1.20 |
| Std. Error of Mean | .065 | .151 | .107 | .045 | .045 |
| Median | 2.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 3.00 | 1.00 |
| Mode | 2 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 |
| Std. Deviation | .716 | 1.657 | 1.177 | .498 | .495 |
| Variance | .513 | 2.744 | 1.386 | .248 | .245 |
| Skewness | .132 | .030 | -.579 | .144 | 2.497 |
| Std. Error of Skewness | .221 | .221 | .221 | .221 | .221 |
| Kurtosis | -.177 | -1.227 | -1.267 | 1.054 | 5.493 |
| Std. Error of Kurtosis | .438 | .438 | .438 | .438 | .438 |
| Range | 3 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Minimum | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| Maximum | 4 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
Barriers to women participation in green jobs in the construction industry.
| Male dominance of green jobs | 4 | 5 | 4.83 | .374 |
| Discrimination | 4 | 5 | 4.75 | .435 |
| Low level of green job training | 4 | 5 | 4.67 | .473 |
| Lack of experience | 4 | 5 | 4.58 | .495 |
| Lack of role models in these fields | 4 | 5 | 4.42 | .495 |
| Biased recruitment | 4 | 5 | 4.27 | .444 |
| Inadequate skills sets required | 4 | 5 | 4.19 | .395 |
| Cultural and traditional factors | 3 | 5 | 4.02 | .518 |
| Position at work | 3 | 5 | 3.95 | .672 |
| Reluctance to accept women skills | 3 | 5 | 3.77 | .618 |
| Limited green job opportunities | 3 | 5 | 3.67 | .653 |
| Harsh working conditions/ environment | 3 | 5 | 3.60 | .666 |
| Stressful nature of work | 3 | 5 | 3.53 | .660 |
| Low interest from women | 3 | 5 | 3.43 | .576 |
| Low career growth/ progression | 2 | 5 | 3.35 | .694 |
| Low investment in green works | 2 | 5 | 3.27 | .786 |
| Low pay in green jobs | 2 | 5 | 3.27 | .670 |
| Sexual harassment | 2 | 5 | 3.18 | .635 |
Socio-economic benefits of women participation in green jobs in the construction industry.
| Increased awareness on sustainable solutions | 4 | 5 | 4.88 | .332 |
| Increased education attainment among females | 4 | 5 | 4.79 | .408 |
| Increased roles for women | 4 | 5 | 4.71 | .456 |
| Sustainable growth and development | 4 | 5 | 4.63 | .486 |
| Economic growth for nations | 4 | 5 | 4.53 | .501 |
| Improved ecosystem | 4 | 5 | 4.39 | .490 |
| Better household energy consumption | 4 | 5 | 4.28 | .453 |
| Creation of more green jobs | 4 | 5 | 4.13 | .341 |
| Improved family health | 4 | 5 | 4.08 | .278 |
| Harnessing women strength and skills | 3 | 5 | 4.01 | .399 |
| Increased participation of women in other sectors | 3 | 5 | 3.92 | .495 |
| Increased energy efficiency and security | 3 | 5 | 3.83 | .560 |
| Cost effective solutions | 3 | 4 | 3.66 | .476 |
| Increased green energy market | 3 | 4 | 3.58 | .496 |
| Cheaper renewable energy solutions | 3 | 4 | 3.53 | .501 |
| Improved human welfare | 2 | 4 | 3.45 | .646 |
| Increase organizations and countries’ commitment to cut GHG emissions | 2 | 4 | 3.35 | .630 |
| Increased investment in green economy | 2 | 4 | 3.27 | .730 |
| Reduction of environmental pollution | 2 | 4 | 3.18 | .698 |
| Reduction in production and use of pollutants | 2 | 4 | 3.06 | .802 |
| Reduction of sick building syndrome | 2 | 4 | 2.89 | .696 |
| Better waste generation and management | 2 | 4 | 2.77 | .590 |
| Better air quality | 2 | 4 | 2.68 | .505 |
Categorical Regression of Barriers influencing the level of participation in green construction.
| df | F | Sig. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male dominance of green jobs | .003 | .114 | 1 | .001 | .979 |
| Stressful nature of work | .179 | .295 | 2 | .371 | .691 |
| Biased recruitment | .007 | .126 | 1 | .003 | .955 |
| Discrimination | .060 | .119 | 1 | .250 | .618 |
| Low level of green job training | -.076 | .118 | 1 | .413 | .522 |
| Inadequate skills sets required | -.044 | .136 | 1 | .103 | .749 |
| Sexual harassment | .345 | .272 | 3 | 1.607 | .193 |
| Low interest from women | -.176 | .302 | 2 | .341 | .712 |
| Position at work | -.016 | .160 | 1 | .011 | .919 |
| Harsh working conditions/ environment | -.402 | .294 | 2 | 1.873 | .160 |
| Low career growth/ progression | .429 | .200 | 3 | 4.625 | .005** |
| Lack of experience | -.038 | .137 | 1 | .078 | .781 |
| Low investment in green works | -.214 | .223 | 3 | .925 | .432 |
| Low pay in green jobs | -.332 | .287 | 2 | 1.342 | .267 |
| Cultural and traditional factors | -.051 | .154 | 1 | .112 | .739 |
| Reluctance to accept women skills | -.204 | .234 | 2 | .761 | .470 |
| Limited green job opportunities | .512 | .210 | 2 | 5.963 | .004** |
| Lack of role models in these fields | -.177 | .120 | 1 | 2.183 | .143 |
| Dependent Variable: Professional Background | |||||
Fig. 2Level of participation of women in green jobs in the construction industry.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source location | |
| Data accessibility |