| Literature DB >> 27752523 |
Quan-Hoang Vuong1, Trong-Khang Nguyen2.
Abstract
The research process started in the first week of August 10, 2014 and ended early February 2015, obtaining qualified data for 330 patients from many hospitals in northern Vietnam. Its expansion was performed for an enlarged dataset through May 2015, containing 900 records. This article exemplifies the attempt to examine the likelihood of destitution among Vietnamese patients due to insufficient insurance coverage, cost of treatment and patient׳s status of residency during a curative hospital stay. The result suggests that the patients, who are poor and come from rural areas, face serious obstacles in accessing health care services. This data article presents attributes and values of the data set used in the article provided at DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-1279-x Vuong (2015) [4].Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27752523 PMCID: PMC5061292 DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2016.09.040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Data Brief ISSN: 2352-3409
Fig. 1Status of health in relation to expenditure and average daily cost. (a) Range of expenses for patients with treatment outcome categories (A, B, C or D). (b) Range of daily cost for patients falling into different treatment outcome groups (A, B, C or D).
Numerical variables of the data set.
| Coded name | Explanation | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Spent | Total money spent during his/her stay in hospital in millions of Vietnamese Dong. According to official exchange rates at the time of survey, VND 1 million was equivalent to $47.2. | Million of VND |
| Dcost | Average daily cost the patient had to pay during the entire treatment period | Million of VND |
| Income | Annual income | Million of VND |
| Days | Number of days the patient spent in the hospital | Day |
| Pins; Pinc; Pchar; Ploan | Portions of finance from sources: insurance reimbursement, income, charity funds from civil organizations or employers, or borrowings | Percent |
| Streat, Srel, Senv | Percentage of funds used for the purpose of main treatments, for covering costs of relatives coming to help the patient, or paying “extra thank-you money” or bribing doctors/staff | Percent |
Categorical variables of the data set.
| Coded name | Explanation | Values |
|---|---|---|
| Res | Whether the patient originally resides in the region where the hospital is located | Yes, no |
| Stay | A dummy variable to define the patient׳s hospitalization by length of stay | Less than 10 days (S), 10 days or longer (L) |
| Insured | Whether a patient has a valid health insurance | Yes, no |
| SES | Socio-economic status | High, medium, low |
| Based on average IncRank of working members in the family who are able and willing to support the patient if so required | ||
| Illness | Severity of illness or injury when hospitalized | Emergency, bad, ill, light |
| IncRank | Rankings of income of a patient | High (>180), middle (48–180), low (<48) |
| Excel: | ||
| =IF([cell]>180,"Hi",IF([cell]>48,"Mid","Lo")) | ||
| Burden | Patient׳s and family׳s self-evaluation of their financial position after paying health care costs | strong, no adverse affect at all (A); affected but not the worrying level (B); seriously affected or destitute/bankrupt (C) |
| End | Patient׳s health status after treatment | complete recovery (A), partial recovery, needing post-treatment follow-ups (B), stopped whilst being treated (C), or quit early (D) |
| AvgCost | Average daily cost the patient had to pay during treatment period | ≤1.5 (Low), 1.5 to 5.4 (Med), and >5.4 (Hi) |
Possible research questions arising from the data set.
| Do the residency status of patients and insurance coverage determine the probability of patients falling into debts? The specific factor of residency status is important in Vietnam because society has for long been skeptical about provincial healthcare, leading patients to travel to large hospitals in major cities such as Hanoi, Hai Phong, or HCMC. Doing so not only necessitates accompanying and caretaking of family members but also entails travel costs and informational asymmetry on drug prices, treatment schedules, the best hospital to visit and even the ‘right amount’ of “extra thank-you money” (a kind of out-of-pocket expense; or OOP). |
| As for two most important factors to Vietnamese patients/households, i.e. treatment costs and illness, is there evidence to support this view and if yes, whose influence better explains the possibility of end results of treatment, empirically? |
| Can the likelihood of paying too little or too much out-of-pocket “extra thank-you money” be determined by the severity of illness and/or income of patients? This OOP amount may be significant but if a patient appreciates the value of service, he/she would be willing to pay depending on his/her availability of finance, before or after the course of treatment. |
Fig. 2Contrasting financial welfare of patients as a function of status of residency and insurance cover/lack of cover.
Fig. 3Changing probabilities of destitution for patients as a function of short versus long hospitalization.
| Subject area | |
| More specific subject area | |
| Type of data | |
| How data was acquired | |
| Data format | |
| Experimental factors | |
| Experimental features | |
| Data source locations | |
| Data accessibility |
| >med=read.csv(“E:/…/Med2015/Data/P330.csv,header=T) |
| >attach(med) |
| >table1=xtabs(~Res+Insured+Burden) |
| >ftable(table1) |
| > burden1=read.csv(“E:/…/Med2015/Data/table1.csv,header=T) |
| > attach(burden1) |
| > contrasts(burden1$Res)=contr.treatment(levels(burden1$Res),base=2) |
| > contrasts(burden1$Insured)=contr.treatment(levels(burden1$Insured),base=2) |
| > fit.burden1=vglm(cbind(C,B,A)~Res+Insured,family=multinomial,data=burden1) |
| > summary(fit.burden1) |
| >med=read.csv(“E:/…/P330.csv,header=T) |
| >attach(med) |
| > table2=xtabs(~AvgCost+Insured+Burden) |
| > ftable(table2) |
| > burden2=read.csv(“E:/…/table2.csv,header=T) |
| > attach(burden2) |
| > contrasts(burden2$AvgCost)=contr.treatment(levels(burden2$AvgCost),base=2) |
| > contrasts(burden2$Insured)=contr.treatment(levels(burden2$Insured),base=2) |
| > fit.burden2=vglm(cbind(C,B,A)~AvgCost+Insured,family=multinomial,data=burden2) |
| > summary(fit.burden2) |