| Literature DB >> 29515582 |
Chien-Chia Chen1,2, Alice Koenig1, Carole Saison1,3, Suzan Dahdal1,3, Guillaume Rigault1, Thomas Barba1, Morgan Taillardet1, Dimitri Chartoire1, Michel Ovize2,4, Emmanuel Morelon1,2,3,4, Thierry Defrance1, Olivier Thaunat1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Antibody-mediated rejection is currently the leading cause of transplant failure. Prevailing dogma predicts that B cells differentiate into anti-donor-specific antibody (DSA)-producing plasma cells only with the help of CD4+ T cells. Yet, previous studies have shown that dependence on helper T cells decreases when high amounts of protein antigen are recruited to the spleen, two conditions potentially met by organ transplantation. This could explain why a significant proportion of transplant recipients develop DSA despite therapeutic immunosuppression. Using murine models, we confirmed that heart transplantation, but not skin grafting, is associated with accumulation of a high quantity of alloantigens in recipients' spleen. Nevertheless, neither naive nor memory DSA responses could be observed after transplantation of an allogeneic heart into recipients genetically deficient for CD4+ T cells. These findings suggest that DSA generation rather result from insufficient blockade of the helper function of CD4+ T cells by therapeutic immunosuppression. To test this second theory, different subsets of circulating T cells: CD8+, CD4+, and T follicular helper [CD4+CXCDR5+, T follicular helper cells (Tfh)], were analyzed in 9 healthy controls and 22 renal recipients. In line with our hypothesis, we observed that triple maintenance immunosuppression (CNI + MMF + steroids) efficiently blocked activation-induced upregulation of CD25 on CD8+, but not on CD4+ T cells. Although the level of expression of CD40L and ICOS was lower on activated Tfh of immunosuppressed patients, the percentage of CD40L-expressing Tfh was the same than control patients, as was Tfh production of IL21. Induction therapy with antithymocyte globulin (ATG) resulted in prolonged depletion of Tfh and reduction of CD4+ T cells number with depleting monoclonal antibody in murine model resulted in exponential decrease in DSA titers. Furthermore, induction with ATG also had long-term beneficial influence on Tfh function after immune reconstitution. We conclude that CD4+ T cell help is mandatory for naive and memory DSA responses, making Tfh cells attractive targets for improving the prevention of DSA generation and to prolong allograft survival. Waiting for innovative treatments to be translated into the clinical field ATG induction seems to currently offer the best clinical prospect to achieve this goal.Entities:
Keywords: alloimmune response; antibody-mediated rejection; donor-specific antibody; immunosuppression; transplant immunology; transplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29515582 PMCID: PMC5825980 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.00275
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Presentation of experimental model. (A) Representative flow cytometry profiles of CD3+ T cells in PBMC and secondary lymphoid organs is shown for wild-type C57BL/6 (upper row) and AβKO (lower row) mice. Mean and SD from analysis of 10 animals of each strain are indicated for the % of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. (B) Evolution over time of anti-NP IgG titer (mean ± SD) after immunization with the thymo-dependent model antigen NP-KLH is shown for wild-type C57BL/6 (n = 3, dashed line) and AβKO (n = 3, black line). (C) Anti-NP antibody titer was measured by ELISA in the circulation of AβKO mice (n = 3) before and every 7 days postimmunization with the thymo-independent model antigen NP-dextran (mean ± SD). (D) Splenocytes from C57BL/6 (negative controls) and HLA A2 transgenic mice were incubated with fluorescent-conjugated mice anti-human HLA I monoclonal antibody (mAb) (W6/32). Representative flow cytometry histograms are shown. (E) To quantify donor specific antibody (DSA), diluted sera were incubated with K562 or single antigen expressing cell line (SAL)-A2 for 30 min at 4°C. Cells were washed and incubated with a phycoerythrin (PE)-conjugated anti-light chain mAb before measurement of PE mean fluorescence intensity by flow cytometry. Anti-A2 antibody titer was normalized as explained in Section “Materials and Methods.” The normalized DSA titer reflects the fold increases of specific signal over the baseline. (F) Representative examples of cytometry profiles obtained after incubation of K562 and SAL-A2 with an anti-A2 immune serum are shown.
Figure 2Site of allosensitization and CD4+ T cell help for naive donor-specific antibody response. (A) Skin from C57BL/6 or HLA-A2 transgenic (A2) donor was grafted to C57BL/6 or AβKO recipient. Survivals of skin graft were compared between the three groups using Log rank test. (B) A2 skin was grafted to C57BL/6 or AβKO recipients. Evolution of normalized donor specific antibody (DSA) titer (mean ± SD) in the circulation of recipients is shown. Log-rank test; **p < 0.01. Skin graft or heart transplant from GFP+ transgenic donor was grafted/transplanted to C57BL/6 recipient. (C) The location of draining and non-draining lymph node according to the sensitization procedure is shown on the scheme. Two days post-procedure the percentage (D) and absolute number (E) of GFP+ cells was enumerated by flow cytometry in the secondary lymphoid organs of recipients (each symbol represents a mice, mean is indicated). (F) A2 heart was transplanted to C57BL/6 or AβKO recipients. Evolution of normalized DSA titer (mean ± SD) in the circulation of recipients is shown.
Figure 3CD4+ T cell help is mandatory for memory donor-specific antibody (DSA) response. (A) Allogeneic heart from HLA A2 transgenic (A2) or BALB/c donor was transplanted to C57BL/6 recipient. Fifty days posttransplantation HLA A2-specific memory B cells were enumerated in the spleen of recipients by ELISpot. Representative wells are shown and the number of A2-specific memory B cells (mean ± SD) is plotted for the two groups (n = 4). (B) Graphical representation of the experimental setting used to evaluate the importance of CD4+ T cell help in memory DSA response. (C) Flow cytometry was used to quantify the proportion (mean ± SD) of B cells (B220+CD19+) and helper T cells (CD3+CD4+) in controls (C57BL/6; left column) and RAG2 KO recipients before memory B cell transfer (day 0, second column from the left), just prior heart transplantation (day 7, third column from the left), and 42 days after A2 heart transplantation (right column). (D) The purity of B cell suspension, obtained from the spleen of C57BL/6 mice sensitized with a A2 or a BALB/c heart transplantation, was evaluated by flow cytometry: before magnetic isolation (left panel), after magnetic isolation (middle panel) and after flow sorting (just prior transfer to RAG2KO mice, left panel). (E) HLA A2-specific memory B cells were enumerated by ELISpot in B cell suspensions before transfer (left histogram) and in the spleen of RAG2 KO animals transplanted with an A2 heart 100 days after transfer (right histogram). (F) Evolution of normalized donor-specific antibody titer (mean ± SD) was monitored in the circulation of 3 groups of recipients transplanted with an A2 heart: wild-type C57BL/6 (positive controls, dotted line), RAG2 KO transferred with anti-BALB/c memory B cells (negative controls, dashed line), and RAG2 KO transferred with anti-A2 memory B cells (experimental group, black line).
Figure 4Impact of maintenance immunosuppression on CD4+ T cell activation in the clinic. (A) T cells were prospectively monitored in the circulation of 9 healthy controls and 22 patients after renal transplantation (3 months, 3M; and 12 months, 12M). Peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) and plasma (containing or not immunosuppressive drugs) were separated by Ficoll. (B) Tacrolimus trough levels (T0) and areas under the curve (AUC) of mycophenolate mofetil measured in the plasma of renal transplanted patients at 3 and 12M are plotted (each symbol is a patient). (C) Left panel: representative FACS profile of controls (Ctrl; left column) and renal recipients (3 M, middle column; 12 M, left column) The expression of the activation marker CD25 was measured by flow cytometry on the surface of CD4+ (top) and CD8+ (bottom) T cells. The analysis was performed after 24H culture in patient’s own plasma without (gray area) or with (black line) stimulation with CD3/CD28 microbeads. The percentage of CD25-expressing T cells after stimulation is indicated (mean ± SD). Right panel: the ratio of the percentage of CD4+ T cells expressing CD25 over the percentage of CD8+ T cells expressing CD25 after stimulation is plotted for the 9 controls (Ctrl, black symbols) and the 22 renal recipients at 3 and 12M (red symbols). Ratios were compared between Ctrl and renal recipients at M3 and M12: Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. **p < 0.01. (D,E) Flow cytometry was used to analyze the expression of helper molecules CD40L (D) or ICOS (E) on T follicular helper cells (Tfh) surface after 24H culture in control’s patient’s own plasma without (gray area) or with (black line) stimulation with CD3/CD28 microbeads. Left panel: representative FACS profile. Middle panel: percentage of Tfh that express the helper molecule. Right panel: level of expression of the helper molecule [mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)]. Each control (Ctrl, black) and renal recipient at 3 and 12M (red) is a symbol. (F) Flow cytometry was used to analyze the production of IL21 by Tfh in controls (Ctrl, black symbols) and renal recipients at 3 and 12M posttransplantation (red symbols) for whom frozen PBMCs were available. Left panel: representative FACS profile. Middle: percentage of IL21-expressing Tfh. Right: level of expression of IL21 (MFI). Percentage of positive Tfh and MFI were compared between Ctrl and renal recipients at M3 and M12: Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.
Characteristics of study population.
| Recipients | All pts | ATG | BasiliX | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 22 (100) | 11 (50) | 11 (50) | ||
| Age at transplantation (years) | 47 ± 13 | 47 ± 16 | 47 ± 9 | 0.99 |
| Men | 14 (64) | 6 (55) | 8 (73) | 0.66 |
| Cause of ESRD | 0.09 | |||
| Glomerulonephritis | 7 (31) | 3 (27) | 4 (36) | |
| Diabetes mellitus | 8 (36) | 6 (55) | 2 (18) | |
| ADPKD | 3 (14) | 2 (18) | 1 (9) | |
| Other | 4 (18) | 0 (0) | 4 (36) | |
| Duration of dialysis before Tx (months) | 22 ± 14 | 23 ± 12 | 21 ± 16 | 0.38 |
| Donor age (years) | 47 (13) | 43 ± 14 | 47 ± 9 | 0.43 |
| Men | 13 (50) | 6 (55) | 4 (36) | 0.67 |
| Deceased donor | 21 (81) | 10 (91) | 8 (73) | 0.47 |
| Expanded criteria donor | 11 (42) | 5 (45) | 4 (36) | 1 |
| Number of HLA MisMX (A, B, DR) | 3.7 ± 1.6 | 4.3 ± 1.5 | 3.2 ± 1.6 | 0.10 |
| Cold ischemia time (hours) | 11 ± 6 | 12 ± 4 | 11 ± 6 | 0.47 |
| Induction therapy | Not tested | |||
| Antithymocyte globulin (rabbit) | 11 (50) | 11 (100) | 0 (0) | |
| Basiliximab | 11 (50) | 0 (0) | 11 (100) | |
| Maintenance immunosuppression | 0.54 | |||
| Tacrolimus | 16 (73) | 9 (82) | 7 (66) | |
| Cyclosporin | 6 (27) | 2 (18) | 4 (36) | |
| Everolimus | 2 (9) | 0 (0) | 2 (18) | |
| Mycophenolate Mofetil | 20 (91) | 11 (100) | 9 (82) | |
| Corticosteroids | 22 (100) | 11 (100) | 11 (100) | |
ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; ATG, antithymocyte globulin; BasiliX, basiliximab; ESRD, end-stage renal disease; MisMX, mismatches.
*Comparison between patients induced with ATG and basiliximab: chi-square test for comparison of proportions and Mann–Whitney test for comparison of continuous variables.
Figure 5Reduction of CD4+ T cells number dampens donor specific antibody (DSA) responses. (A) The number of circulating T follicular helper cells was evaluated in the cohort of 22 renal transplanted patients by flow cytometry and compared according to the nature of immunosuppressive drug used for induction: rabbit anti-thymoglobulin (anti-thymocyte globulin, red line; n = 11) or basiliximab (blue line; n = 11). Gray areas indicate 95 confidence intervals. Friedman paired test with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. **p < 0.01; ****p < 0.0001. (B) Various doses of anti-CD4 mAb GK1.5 were sequentially administered IP to wild-type C57BL/6 mice to obtain various level of CD4+ T cell depletion (n = 3 mice per group). Black arrows indicate the timing of mAb administrations. Evolution of the % of CD3+ cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC) (mean ± SD) over time is shown in the control (PBS) and the three experimental groups. (C) Graphical representation of the experimental setting used to evaluate the impact of the reduction of circulating CD4+ T cells number on naive and memory DSA responses. C57BL/6 mice were depleted with various dose of anti-CD4 mAb GK1.5 and sensitized at day 0 (naive response) and day 60 (memory response) by IV injection of 10 × 106 PBMC from A2 transgenic donors. (D) Evolution of normalized DSA titer (mean ± SD) in the circulation of the control (PBS) and the three experimental groups with various level of CD4 + T cell depletion is shown. (E) The relation between the number of circulating CD4 + T cells and DSA titer is shown for naive (left panel) and memory (right panel) responses (mean ± SD). Exponential regression models are plotted (dashed line).
Figure 6Antithymocyte globulin (ATG) induction has long-term impact on T follicular helper cells (Tfh) functionality. (A) Tacrolimus trough levels (T0; left panel) and areas under the curve (AUC) of mycophenolate mofetil (right panel) measured 3 months (3 M) and 12 months (12 M) after transplantation were compared for renal recipients that received induction by ATG (red symbols) or basiliximab (blue symbols). (B,C) Flow cytometry was used to analyze the expression of helper molecules CD40L (B) or ICOS (C) on Tfh surface after 24 h culture in patient’s own plasma and stimulation with CD3/CD28 microbeads. Left panel: percentage of activated Tfh that express the helper molecule. Right panel: level of expression of the helper molecule (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI). Analyses were performed just before transplantation [end stage renal disease (ESRD)/no immunosuppressive drugs, 0 M] and 3 months (3 M) and 12 months (12 M) after renal transplantation (no ESRD/on immunosuppression). Renal recipients that received induction by ATG (red symbols) were compared to patients that received induction by basiliximab (blue symbols). Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn’s multiple comparisons. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01.