Takuya Hada1, Ryo Momosaki2, Masahiro Abo1. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 2. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine University Hospital, Mizonokuchi, Kanagawa, Japan. momosakiryo@gmail.com.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of leg orthotic therapy for improving activities of daily living after spinal cord injury. SETTING: Participating acute care and rehabilitation hospitals across Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively identified individuals with spinal cord injury admitted to eight participating hospitals in 2015-2016 from the Japan Rehabilitation Database. Data for 293 individuals were analyzed. Propensity score analysis by inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for potential bias and create two comparable groups. Outcomes were compared between the leg orthotic group and the non-leg orthotic group, using IPW. The primary outcome was motor Functional Independence Measure® (FIM) effectiveness score and the secondary outcome was motor FIM score at discharge. FIM was measured on hospital admission and discharge. RESULTS: Leg orthoses were prescribed for 26% of the 293 individuals. Those prescribed leg orthoses had significantly higher motor FIM effectiveness scores than those who were not, before and after IPW (motor FIM effectiveness: 0.54 vs. 0.35, p < 0.01 and 0.45 vs. 0.36, p = 0.02). Discharge motor FIM was significantly higher in individuals who were prescribed leg orthoses than in those who were not, before and after IPW (discharge motor FIM: 64.5 vs. 52.2, p < 0.01 and 58.9 vs. 53.5, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Leg orthoses may improve activities of daily living in individuals with spinal cord injury after the acute phase.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of leg orthotic therapy for improving activities of daily living after spinal cord injury. SETTING: Participating acute care and rehabilitation hospitals across Japan. METHODS: We retrospectively identified individuals with spinal cord injury admitted to eight participating hospitals in 2015-2016 from the Japan Rehabilitation Database. Data for 293 individuals were analyzed. Propensity score analysis by inverse probability weighting (IPW) was applied to adjust for potential bias and create two comparable groups. Outcomes were compared between the leg orthotic group and the non-leg orthotic group, using IPW. The primary outcome was motor Functional Independence Measure® (FIM) effectiveness score and the secondary outcome was motor FIM score at discharge. FIM was measured on hospital admission and discharge. RESULTS:Leg orthoses were prescribed for 26% of the 293 individuals. Those prescribed leg orthoses had significantly higher motor FIM effectiveness scores than those who were not, before and after IPW (motor FIM effectiveness: 0.54 vs. 0.35, p < 0.01 and 0.45 vs. 0.36, p = 0.02). Discharge motor FIM was significantly higher in individuals who were prescribed leg orthoses than in those who were not, before and after IPW (discharge motor FIM: 64.5 vs. 52.2, p < 0.01 and 58.9 vs. 53.5, p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS:Leg orthoses may improve activities of daily living in individuals with spinal cord injury after the acute phase.
Authors: Steven C Kirshblum; Michael M Priebe; Chester H Ho; William M Scelza; Anthony E Chiodo; Lisa-Ann Wuermser Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2007-03 Impact factor: 3.966