Literature DB >> 21102574

Comparison of lower extremity motor score parameters for patients with motor incomplete spinal cord injury using gait parameters.

J C Shin1, J H Yoo, T-H Jung, H R Goo.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective investigation using gait analysis and medical records.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between ambulatory function improvement and an increase in lower-limb motor scores in persons with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI) and to compare the efficiency of lower extremity motor score (LEMS) and ambulatory motor index (AMI) in representation of ambulatory function improvement using gait analysis.
SETTING: SCI Unit, Yonsei Rehabilitation Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
METHODS: The gait analysis from 43 patients with SCI (paraplegic, n=22, tetraplegic n=21) were reviewed. The gait analysis data were obtained with Vicon 370 system. The LEMS and AMI were assessed before the gait analysis and the influence of an increase in lower-limb motor scores were investigated with linear parameters of gait analysis.
RESULTS: For group including both tetraplegic and paraplegic patients, both AMI and LEMS were statistically correlated with gait speed, step length and negative correlation with double-limb support. However, only LEMS was correlated with cadence. For the paraplegic group, with AMI and LEMS, there were correlation with gait speed, step length and right single-limb support and negative correlation with right double-limb support. However, only LEMS was correlated with left cadence and negative correlation with double-limb support. For the tetraplegic group, only left cadence was statistically correlated with AMI.
CONCLUSION: Both AMI and LEMS were useful in terms of providing information for capability of ambulatory function for the paraplegic group. However, for the tetraplegic group, both AMI and LEMS do not provide sufficient information for ambulatory function of the incomplete SCI patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21102574     DOI: 10.1038/sc.2010.158

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spinal Cord        ISSN: 1362-4393            Impact factor:   2.772


  5 in total

1.  Video Movement Analysis Using Smartphones (ViMAS): A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Monica J Finkbiner; Kira M Gaina; Marie C McRandall; Megan M Wolf; Vicky M Pardo; Kristina Reid; Brian Adams; Sujay S Galen
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Correlation between time to diagnosis and rehabilitation outcomes in patients with spinal dural arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  Yona Ofran; Ivelin Yovchev; Nurith Hiller; Jose Cohen; Stuart A Rubin; Isabella Schwartz; Zeev Meiner
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.985

3.  Impact of orthotic therapy for improving activities of daily living in individuals with spinal cord injury: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Takuya Hada; Ryo Momosaki; Masahiro Abo
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.772

4.  Improved Gait Speed After Robot-Assisted Gait Training in Patients With Motor Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study.

Authors:  Seungwon Hwang; Hye-Ri Kim; Zee-A Han; Bum-Suk Lee; Soojeong Kim; Hyunsoo Shin; Jae-Gun Moon; Sung-Phil Yang; Mun-Hee Lim; Duk-Youn Cho; Hayeon Kim; Hye-Jin Lee
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-02-28

5.  Physiotherapy using a free-standing robotic exoskeleton for patients with spinal cord injury: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Nicola Postol; Neil J Spratt; Andrew Bivard; Jodie Marquez
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-12-25       Impact factor: 4.262

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.