| Literature DB >> 29514964 |
Rahia Mashoodh1,2, Ireneusz B Habrylo3, Kathryn M Gudsnuk3, Geralyn Pelle4, Frances A Champagne3,5.
Abstract
The paternal transmission of environmentally induced phenotypes across generations has been reported to occur following a number of qualitatively different exposures and appear to be driven, at least in part, by epigenetic factors that are inherited via the sperm. However, previous studies of paternal germline transmission have not addressed the role of mothers in the propagation of paternal effects to offspring. We hypothesized that paternal exposure to nutritional restriction would impact male mate quality and subsequent maternal reproductive investment with consequences for the transmission of paternal germline effects. In the current report, using embryo transfer in mice, we demonstrate that sperm factors in adult food restricted males can influence growth rate, hypothalamic gene expression and behaviour in female offspring. However, under natural mating conditions females mated with food restricted males show increased pre- and postnatal care, and phenotypic outcomes observed during embryo transfer conditions are absent or reversed. We demonstrate that these compensatory changes in maternal investment are associated with a reduced mate preference for food restricted males and elevated gene expression within the maternal hypothalamus. Therefore, paternal experience can influence offspring development via germline inheritance, but mothers can serve as a modulating factor in determining the impact of paternal influences on offspring development.Entities:
Keywords: behaviour; embryo transfer; maternal care; paternal germline transmission
Mesh:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29514964 PMCID: PMC5879637 DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2018.0118
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Biol Sci ISSN: 0962-8452 Impact factor: 5.349
Figure 2.Maternal investment as a function of embryo transfer and paternal FR. (a) In the embryo transfer (ET) condition, surrogate females were mated with vasectomized control fed (CF) males and then implanted with embryos from food restricted (FR) or CF males (generated through matings with superovulated females) to generate ET-CF and ET-FR groups. NM-CF and NM-FR groups were generated through natural matings of females with either CF or FR males, respectively (N = 15 per group). (b) Gestational weight gain increases in response to paternal FR under NM conditions but not in embryo-transferred mothers. (c) Pup licking/grooming is increased on PN1 in response to paternal FR in naturally mated but not embryo-transferred females. **p < 0.01, #p < 0.05.
Figure 1.Female response to male food restriction. (a) Females mated with food-restricted males (FR-mated; N = 59) gained significantly more weight during the gestational period compared with control fed-mated females (CF-mated; N = 54). (b) FR-mated females (N = 21) displayed a higher frequency (%; see Material and methods) of pup nursing on postnatal day 1 compared with CF-mated females (N = 30). (c) FR-mated females have elevated levels of hypothalamic Mest mRNA during late gestation and (d) elevated levels of hypothalamic Peg3 and (e) Esr1 on postpartum day 1 compared with CF-mated females (N = 6 per group). (f) In a habituation–dishabituation task, females are able to distinguish between urine odours of FR and CF males (N = 20). Subsequent presentations of the same male urine odour type resulted in reduced olfactory investigation over time with a dishabituation response (increased investigation) observed following the presentation of a new odour type. (g) Preference scores during the urine preference task. More females preferred CF (preference score less than 0.45) than FR males (N = 20). #p < 0.10, *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 3.Depression-like phenotypes of offspring sired by food restricted fathers. (a) Representative activity plots of female offspring behaviour during the forced-swim test from all four rearing conditions. (b) Female offspring of FR fathers (diamonds) compared with CF (circles) had reduced active swimming time in the last 4 min of a forced-swim test only when sired through ET. No effects of FR were found in males in either mating condition. (c) Female and male offspring of FR fathers (diamonds) consumed less sucrose compared with offspring of CF (circles) regardless of mating condition. (d) Offspring of FR fathers (diamonds) had higher Bdnf mRNA levels than CF offspring (circles) only if born under NM conditions. (e) Crf mRNA levels were elevated in offspring of FR (diamonds) compared with CF fathers (circles) if sired through ET (N = 15 per group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Figure 4.Cognitive behaviour of offspring sired by food restricted fathers. (a) The novel-object recognition task involved presentation of two identical objects followed by a 30 min delay after which the objects were replaced with a familiar (same object) versus novel object to test for memory of the objects. (b) Representative heat maps indicating the proportion of time spent in the test arena for female offspring that were born to control (CF) and food-restricted (FR) fathers under embryo transfer (ET) and NM conditions, red indicating most time spent and blue indicating least. (c) Female offspring of FR fathers (diamonds), compared with offspring of CF fathers (circles), show a lower discrimination index under ET conditions but higher discrimination index under NM conditions (N = 15 per group). (d) No differences in discrimination index were found in male offspring (N = 15 per group). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01.