| Literature DB >> 29513821 |
Pedro Henrique Ferreira Marçal1, Lúcia Alves de Oliveira Fraga2, Ana Márcia Menezes de Mattos1, Laura Menegati1, Angélica da Conceição Oliveira Coelho3, Roberta Olmo Pinheiro4, Euzenir Nunes Sarno4, Malcolm S Duthie5, Henrique Couto Teixeira1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Leprosy remains a health problem in many countries, with difficulties in diagnosis resulting in delayed treatment and more severe disabilities. Antibodies against several Mycobacterium leprae antigens have, however, shown value as diagnostic and/or prognostic markers. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study was to evaluate serum immunoglobulin (Ig) IgM and IgG subclass reactivity against three M. leprae specific antigens: NDO-HSA, a conjugate formed by natural octyl disaccharide bound to human serum albumin; LID-1, the fusion protein product of the ml0405 and ml2331 genes; and NDO-LID, a combination of LID-1 and NDO. METHODS Sera from healthy controls, paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients, and their respective household contacts, were evaluated for the presence of antigen-specific IgM, IgG, and IgG subclass antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The sensitivity and specificity of each ELISA were evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. FINDINGS Our data confirm that serum IgM antibodies against NDO-HSA and IgG antibodies against LID-1, as well as IgG/M antibodies against NDO-LID, are markedly increased in MB patients. For the first time, our data reveal a selective increase in IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies against LID-1 and NDO-LID in MB patients, demonstrating that these antibody isotypes are suitable for differentiation between MB and PB patients. ROC curve analysis indicates an improved capacity for diagnosing MB leprosy patients using the detection of IgG antibodies, particularly the IgG1 isotype, specific to LID-1 and NDO-LID over the performance levels attained with NDO-HSA. CONCLUSIONS Our findings indicate that serological tests based on the detection of antigen-specific IgG1 antibodies are a useful tool to differentiate MB from PB patients, and indicate the enhanced performance of the LID-1 and NDO-LID antigens in the serodiagnosis of leprosy.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29513821 PMCID: PMC5851060 DOI: 10.1590/0074-02760170467
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz ISSN: 0074-0276 Impact factor: 2.743
Characteristics of the study participants
| Groups | n | Gender (M/F) | Age/years (mean) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Paucibacillary patients (PB) | 20 | 7/13 | 23-80 (55,7) |
| Multibacillary patients (MB) | 18 | 11/7 | 13-74 (45,5) |
| Paucibacillary household contacts (HHC - PB) | 20 | 9/11 | 19-68 (38,4) |
| Multibacillary household contacts (HHC - MB) | 28 | 10/18 | 15-62 (37,1) |
| Endemic controls (EC) | 20 | 3/17 | 20-49 (26,4) |
|
| |||
| Total | 106 | 40/66 | 13-80 (40,6) |
Fig. 1: levels of IgM and IgG against NDO-HSA, LID-1 and NDO-LID in paucibacilary (PB) and multibacilary (MB) leprosy patients and their household contacts (HHC-PB and HHC-MB). Each point represents the result obtained from an individual serum sample, with the bars representing the median. EI = Elisa index.
Fig. 2: receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for IgM and IgG responses to LID-1 versus NDO-LID (A, D), LID-1 versus NDO-HSA (B, E) and NDO-LID versus NDO-HSA (C, F).
Sensitivity and specificity of the evaluated antigens in the serodiagnosis of multibacillary leprosy
| Antigens | Isotypes | Cutoff | Sensitivity | Specificity | +LR | -LR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NDO-HSA | IgM | 16.93 | 70 | 98 | 35.0 | 0.31 |
| IgG | 5.25 | 85 | 78 | 3.86 | 0.19 | |
| IgG1 | 1.31 | 75 | 88 | 6.25 | 0.28 | |
| IgG2 | 1.56 | 65 | 78 | 2.95 | 0.45 | |
| IgG3 | 1.82 | 70 | 84 | 4.37 | 0.36 | |
| LID-1 | IgM | 6.06 | 80 | 82 | 4.44 | 0.24 |
| IgG | 40.26 | 90 | 100 | 48.0 | 0.10 | |
| IgG1 | 18.10 | 90 | 100 | 11.0 | 0.10 | |
| IgG2 | 2.49 | 80 | 88 | 6.67 | 0.23 | |
| IgG3 | 6.13 | 85 | 74 | 3.27 | 0.20 | |
| NDO-LID | IgM | 18.02 | 85 | 86 | 6.07 | 0.17 |
| IgG | 39.28 | 95 | 98 | 47.5 | 0.05 | |
| IgG1 | 5.15 | 90 | 90 | 9.00 | 0.11 | |
| IgG2 | 2.36 | 85 | 82 | 4.72 | 0.18 | |
| IgG3 | 5.14 | 90 | 88 | 7.50 | 0.11 |
a: cutoff, sensitivity and specificity data were determined based on the analysis of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves; b: the values of sensitivity and specificity were determined according to the point of the ROC curve nearest to the point of sensitivity and specificity equal to 100%; c: +LR and -LR = positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR).
Fig. 3: levels of IgG1, IgG2, IgG3 and IgG4 against NDO-HSA, LID-1 and NDO-LID in paucibacillary (PB) and multibacillary (MB) leprosy patients and their household contacts of PB (HHC-PB) and MB (HHC-MB). Each point represents the result obtained from an individual serum sample, with the bars representing the median. EI = Elisa index.